Category: Literary/Ebooks

  • What exactly does a human being do?

    Today I was brainstorming possible events or activities in a person’s life. Why? I was trying to create a reference page of normal events/situations which could be settings for dramatic things to take place. I have done this for several other parts of life as a springboard for brainstorming.

    If you think about it, life is not that complicated. There’s only so many activities that I normally engage in. To be fair, I am not a very active person and I am single (ie. unattached) and live with my mother. I would imagine that there’s no more than 100-200 activities that describe my life (most of it anyway). The activities listed below probably account for 95% of my day. That’s all it is.

    Most of the activities are common to all humans across the globe. Sure, the activities of different people might have slight variations. For example, if you were a musician, you would probably spend time rehearsing with your instrument, going to group rehearsals, performance, etc. That is an example of specialized activities on the job. A U.S. president probably has to perform certain specialized tasks that most humans rarely have to do, but chances are, this list includes 95% of the activities that even a president or a pope would do.

    The list below doesn’t capture the magic and poetry and sadness of life itself. For example, I can say that listening to music throughout the day gives me a lot of joy. Listening to music keeps me going; I do it while working on intellectual tasks or even trying to sleep. I would like to say that I love reading books and discovering new authors, but honestly in my mid-adult years, I have very little time to do the activities I love the most.

    I imagine a video game designer for the Sims has already made a map of human activities like this. It is surprisingly easy to compile this list, and I suspect that the majority of these activities can be programmed fairly easily (the movement part at least).

    It occurs to me that I do a lot of things in bed. I do a significant amount of thinking and meditation there, along with reading and of course sleep. Sometimes I do some writing (or at least note-taking).

    One has to wonder how this list would be different 50, 100 or 200 years ago. Instead of doing stuff online, maybe you’d go a library

    I also spend a lot of time doing things on my computer desk, including this blogpost. But I also drink and eat on it. Here goes my list:

    Solitary Activites

    Solitary moments

    • taking a walk through the neighborhood
    • driving in a car
    • swimming
    • riding a bicycle
    • taking a shower
    • sleeping
    • thinking/dreaming in bed
    • exercising/weights

    Meals at Home

    • eating dinner together with housemates or visitors
    • or alone
    • snacking while doing something else (working, watching TV, web surfing etc).

    Internet usage

    • research for purchase
    • read daily news
    • learn about new concept or product
    • research people
    • social media following friends and celebs
    • posting on social media/generating content

    Entertainment

    • watching TV/movie
    • reading book
    • goint to an arts event — concert, play, movie
    • Participating in a multiplayer video game

    Personal Hygiene

    • Brushing Teeth & flossing
    • Urinating/defecating
    • Taking shower, washing hair
    • Washing hands and face.
    • shaving

    Solitary Chores

    • preparing meal & washing dishes
    • paying bills, planning finances
    • cleaning room & organizing
    • checking mail
    • walking dog, feeding dog
    • getting gas
    • washing clothes, drying, folding and putting away.
    • picking up trash/taking out trash

    Outdoor Work

    • Yardwork. Mowing the lawn.
    • Taking out/bringing in the trash.
    • Picking up the mail/dropping off the mail.
    • Simple home maintenance (Decorating the door and yard. Cleaning the outside)

    Relaxing

    • listening to Music (maybe with others)
    • taking a walk (walking the dog)
    • Playing with the dog
    • playing a single player game (on the phone, etc).
    • reading
    • watching tv
    • gardening (relaxing chores)

    Hobbies

    • Join a club or group or church; attend meetings
    • Buy equipment to pursue the hobby (do research, learn skill, etc)
    • Learn the activity by self or with others
    • Do solitary activities related to the hobby

    Learning

    • Follow a tutorial
    • Try by doing
    • Try, test, try
    • Asking Somebody to explain
    • buy training
    • buy and read a book
    • Read the manual
    • attend a class or seminar

    Writing

    • email to personal friend
    • blogposts/essay
    • fiction
    • write a complaint
    • post and/or share on social media

    Driving/On the Road

    • Routine car trip within town
    • Being caught in traffic
    • long trip to another city
    • stopping at rest stop (for food, restroom, drink)
    • finding a parking space.
    • Waiting for someone in the parking lot

    Human Interactions

    Occasional Social events

    • birthday parties
    • thanksgiving
    • christmas parties family
    • xmas party friends
    • xmas party work
    • Eating out with friends or family (& dates?)
    • School Reunions

    Family Activities

    • driving people to places
    • birthday parties for family members (small or big)
    • family meeting (for big announcements & decisions)
    • attending educational events of children (plays, award ceremonies, graduation, etc).
    • having dinner with people
    • holiday togetherness, parties
    • Babysitting for children
    • calllng family/friends

    Social Activities within the household

    • repairman visits home to repair something
    • package delivery
    • home health care
    • exterminator visit/air conditioner repair
    • inspection/insurance inspection

    Personal errands (usually requires going offsite)

    • go to restaurant to pick up or dine in
    • visiting dentist or doctor for routine exam
    • reporting somewhere for a medical test
    • reporting somewhere to receive a license/permit/document
    • visiting the library to check out or return items or to attend special event
    • bring car or bike to repair shop for maintenance
    • Work out at a gym
    • using mass transit; interacting with strangers
    • Helping a neighbor with routine maintenance

    Shopping Tasks

    • finding a parking space (all types)
    • Directed shopping at stores (buy a specific item). Hardware store, shoe store
    • Undirected shopping (supermarket, Bookstore, clothing store, thrift shop, shopping for clothes, buying gifts for other)
    • Box store shopping (combines directed shopping + browsing). This includes shopping for food

    Telephone or Video Call Events

    • Making plans with friends and family
    • texting with people to make plans
    • Discussing a personal or logistical problem
    • Introductory call with a new friend or date
    • Call to RSVP or cancel something
    • Catching up with old friends or family
    • multiperson video call (mainly for reunions of family/friends)
    • Calling a business to make an appointment
    • Calling a business to ask a question, complain, check on an order
    • receiving a call from a spam caller
    • receiving a call from a stranger who wants to arrange something (a sale, event, etc)

    Exercise & Sports (physical activity which often involves interactions, but also a certain number of repetitive tasks which may be done alone)

    • playing one-on-one with someone (handball, pickle ball, golf)
    • gym repetitions: lifting weights, stair master, treadmill,
    • “practice” — swimming, hitting tennis balls,
    • team sports — done more for the social aspects than the exercise aspects. Flag football, basketball, indoor board games, poker, massively multiplayer online games
    • One on one indoor. Chess, card games, adult-child games,

    Participating in Events (artistic or otherwise)

    • Signing up or auditioning
    • Rehearsing for the Event; Attending meetings, etc.
    • Notifying friend and family about the event
    • Performing at the Event

    Vacation activities (occasional)

    • traveling for several hours to a destination
    • relaxing outdoor activities: hiking, going to the beach.
    • playing games/sports outside (pickle ball, volleyball, basketball
    • nightlife activities — restaurant, club, concerts

    Full-Time Professional Activities (which for certain people and at certain times of life, one does for long stretches of time)

    Technical work/problem solving

    • programming/formatting
    • Research something on the web
    • Asking someone for help online
    • Calling someone to ask for help
    • computer maintenance

    Work-related activities. This might vary radically according to the nature of each job

    • Filling out HR paperwork for onboarding
    • meetings to prioritize tasks and assign them to people
    • Informational meetings about goals and policies
    • Training activities (usually offsite and paid for by employer and faciliated by someone else)
    • gathering information in order to start a task.
    • dealing with both internal and external “customers” and sharing knowledge and expertise
    • asking others for help
    • direct contact with customers/customers/patrons where courtesy is a priority.
    • Writing reports (as output, compliance notes). This includes presentations.
    • CYA emails. Emails to express concerns about something (and noting it officially).
    • Performance Reviews. (Not that time-consuming, but a source of anxiety).
    • Giving presentations at meetings.
    • Organizing things/cleaning things. Moving equipment or objects to the right place.

    Normal intermittent tasks

    • looking for work
    • applying for job
    • renewing license
    • making online payment of recurring bill
    • paying taxes
    • minor repairs
    • being sick/recuperating

    Legal/court events

    • Serving on jury duty
    • renewing driver’s license
    • being stopped by the police; receiving a ticket
    • Reporting a crime
    • Being arrested
      • being caught by the police and driven to jail
      • booked for the charge
      • going to jail, waiting to get bailed out
      • finding attorney; waiting for plea bargain
      • appearing in court as defendant
      • being sentenced, reporting to prison?

    Activities frequent when young

    • playing outside
    • hanging out with other people at someone’s house
    • going to and from school
    • classes with teachers
    • doing homework at night

    Going to a University

    • Traveling to campus
    • Orientation
    • going on outings with classmates
    • going to class
    • doing lab work
    • attending Parties, dances
    • Studying alone
    • studying with partner or with a group
    • Taking tests
    • Watching/participating in a protest

    Major Life Events

    Major Public Events (Two levels: first for the person directly involved and second for those witnessing the occasion)

    • birth
    • religious ceremonies: baptism, first communion, confirmation
    • marriage
    • divorce (usually not public or ceremonial)
    • baby shower/wedding shower
    • big birthday party/surprise party
    • big wedding anniversary
    • funeral
    • graduations

    Major Private Events

    • Having Sex
    • Sickness — Flu, Covid, etc
    • Injury — Going to Doctor or Emergency room or staying home.
    • Breaking Up with Somebody
    • Getting Fired from Work/Quitting a Job
    • Being robbed or beat up
    • Committing an indiscretion or even a crime
    • Learning about the death or major illness of a friend or family member
    • Losing a job
    • Getting in a car accident

  • Interview with Milan Kundera by Philip Roth (corrected)

    In college I read an amazing 1980 interview with Milan Kundera. Novelist Philip Roth did it, and Peter Kussi (W) translated it from French/Czech. and it was included at the end of the Book of Laughter and Forgetting novel. A month ago I stumbled upon the same interview and was similarly blown away by it. I looked for an online copy and found it on the New York Times website. Strangely, according to author/blogger Stephen Saperstein Frug, the New York Times had made a serious transcription error (details here). I compared it against the version in the book, and sure enough, NYT had made a mistake. I am copying the interview from the NYT verbatim and correcting the transcription error as Frug suggests. (If NYT or the estates of either author hunt me down, I’ll take this post down, but they need to publish a corrected version of the interview!) . Note: This interview also appears in its correct form in Roth’s ebook Shop Talk: A Writer and His Colleagues and their Work which is also great and frequently discounted on Amazon.

    PR: Do you think the destruction of the world is coming soon?

    MK: That depends on what you mean by the word “soon.”

    PR: Tomorrow or the day after.

    MK: The feeling that the world is rushing to ruin is an ancient one.

    PR: So then we have nothing to worry about.

    MK: On the contrary. If a fear has been present in the human mind for ages, there must be something to it.

    PR: In any event, it seems to me that this concern is the background against which all the stories in your latest book take place, even those that are of a decidedly humorous nature.

    MK: If someone had told me as a boy: One day you will see your nation vanish from the world, I would have considered it nonsense, something I couldn’t possibly imagine. A man knows he is mortal, but he takes it for granted that his nation possesses a kind of eternal life. But after the Russian invasion of 1968, every Czech was confronted with the thought that his nation could be quietly erased from Europe, just as over the past five decades 40 million Ukrainians have been quietly vanishing from the world without the world paying any heed. Or Lithuanians. Do you know that in the 17th century, Lithuania was a powerful European nation? Today the Russians keep Lithuanians on their reservation like a half-extinct tribe; they are sealed off from the visitors to prevent knowledge about their existence from reaching the outside. I don’t know what the future holds for my nation. It is certain that the Russians will do everything they can to dissolve it gradually into their own civilization. Nobody knows whether they will succeed. But the possibility is here. And the sudden realization that such a possibility exists is enough to change one’s whole sense of life. Nowadays I even see Europe as fragile, mortal.

    PR: And yet, are not the fates of Eastern Europe and Western Europe radically different matters?

    MK: As a concept of cultural history, Eastern Europe is Russia, with its quite specific history anchored in the Byzantine world. Bohemia, Poland, Hungary, just like Austria have never been part of Eastern Europe. From the very beginning they have taken part in the great adventure of Western civilization, with its Gothic, its Renaissance, its Reformation–a movement which has its cradle precisely in this region. It was here, in Central Europe, that modern culture found its greatest impulses; psychoanalysis, structuralism, dodecaphony, Bartok’s music, Kafka’s and Musil’s new esthetics of the novel. The postwar annexation of Central Europe (or at least its major part) by Russian civilization caused Western culture to lose its vital center of gravity. It is the most significant event in the history of the West in our century, and we cannot dismiss the possibility that the end of Central Europe marked the beginning of the end for Europe as a whole.

    PR: During the Prague Spring, your novel “The Joke” and your stories “Laughable Loves” were published in editions of 150,000. After the Russian invasion you were dismissed from your teaching post at the film academy and all your books were removed from the shelves of public libraries. Seven years later you and your wife tossed a few books and some clothes in the back of your car and drove off to France, where you’ve become one of the most widely read foreign authors. How do you feel as an Emigre?

    MK: For a writer, the experience of living in a number of countries is an enormous boon. You can only understand the world if you see it from several sides. My latest book, which came into being in France, unfolds in a special geographic space: Those events which take place in Prague are seen through West European eyes, while what happens in France is seen through the eyes of Prague. It is an encounter of two worlds. On one side, my native country: In the course of a mere half- century, it experienced democracy, fascism, revolution, Stalinist terror as well as the disintegration of Stalinism, German and Russian occupation, mass deportations, the death of the West in its own land. It is thus sinking under the weight of history, and looks at the world with immense skepticism. On the other side, France: For centuries it was the center of the world and nowadays it is suffering from the lack of great historic events. This is why it revels in radical ideologic postures. It is the lyrical, neurotic expectation of some great deed of its own which however is not coming, and will never come.

    PR: Are you living in France as a strange or do you feel culturally at home?

    MK: I am enormously fond of French culture and I am greatly indebted to it. Especially to the older literature. Rebelais is dearest to me of all writers. And Diderot. I love his “Jacques le fataliste” as much as I do Laurence Sterne. Those were the greatest experimenters of all time in the form of the novel. And their experiments were, so to say, amusing, full of happiness and joy, which have by now vanished from French literature and without which everything in art loses its significance. Sterne and Diderot understand the novel as a great game . They discovered the humor of the novelistic form. When I hear learned arguments that the novel has exhausted its possibilities, I have precisely the opposite feeling: In the course of its history the novel missed many of its possibilities. For example, impulses for the development of the novel hidden in Sterne and Diderot have not been picked up by any successors.

    PR: Your latest book is not called a novel, and yet in the text you declare: This book is a novel in the form of variations. So then–is it a novel or not?

    MK: As far as my own quite personal esthetic judgment goes, it really is a novel, but I have no wish to force this opinion on anyone. There is enormous freedom latent within the novelistic form. It is a mistake to regard a certain stereotyped structure as the inviolable essence of the novel.

    PR: Yet surely there is something which makes a novel a novel, and which limits this freedom.

    MK: A novel is a long piece of synthetic prose based on play with invented characters. These are the only limits. By the term synthetic I have in mind the novelist’s desire to grasp his subject from all sides and in the fullest possible completeness. Ironic essay, novelistic narrative, autobiographical fragment, historic fact, flight of fantasy: The synthetic power of the novel is capable of combining everything into a unified whole like the voices of polyphonic music. The unity of a book need not stem from the plot, but can be provided by the theme. In my latest book, there are two such themes: laughter and forgetting.

    PR: Laughter has always been close to you. Your books provoke laughter through humor or irony. When your characters come to grief it is because they bump against a world that has lost its sense of humor.

    MK: I learned the value of humor during the time of Stalinist terror. I was 20 then. I could always recognize a person who was not a Stalinist, a person whom I needn’t fear, by the way he smiled. A sense of humor was a trustworthy sign of recognition. Ever since, I have been terrified by a world that is losing its sense of humor.

    PR: In your last book, though, something else is involved. In a little parable you compare the laughter of angels with the laughter of the devil. The devil laughs because God’s world seems senseless to him; the angels laugh with joy because everything in God’s world has its meaning.

    MK: Yes, man uses the same physiologic manifestations–laughter–to express two different metaphysical attitudes. Someone’s hat drops on a coffin in a freshly dug grave, the funeral loses its meaning and laughter is born. Two lovers race through the meadow, holding hands, laughing. Their laughter has nothing to do with jokes or humor, it is the serious laughter of angels expressing their joy of being. Both kinds of laughter belong among life’s pleasures, but when it also denotes a dual apocalypse: the enthusiastic laughter of angel-fanatics, who are so convinced of their world’s significance that they are ready to hang anyone not sharing their joy. And the other laughter, sounding from the opposite side, which proclaims that everything has become meaningless, that even funerals are ridiculous and group sex a mere comical pantomime. Human life is bounded by two chasms: fanaticism on one side, absolute skepticism on the other.

    PR: What you now call the laughter of angels is a new term for the “lyrical attitude to life” of your previous novels. In one of your books you characterize the era of Stalinist terror as the reign of the hangman and the poet.

    MK: Totalitarianism is not only hell, but also the dream of paradise–the age old drama of a world where everybody would live in harmony, united by a single common will and faith, without secrets from one another. Andre Breton, too, dreamed of this paradise when he talked about the glass house in which he longed to live. If totalitarianism did not exploit these archetypes, which are deep inside us all and rooted deep in all religions, it could never attract so many people, especially during the early phases of its existence. Once the dream of paradise starts to turn into reality, however, here and there people begin to crop up who stand in its way, and so the rulers of paradise must build a little gulag on the side of Eden. In the course of time this gulag grows ever bigger and more perfect, while the adjoining paradise gets ever smaller and poorer.

    PR: In your book, the great French poet Eluard soars over paradise and gulag, singing. Is this bit of history which you mention in the book authentic?

    MK: After the war, Paul Eluard abandoned surrealism and became the greatest exponent of what I might call the “poesy of totalitarianism.” He sang for brotherhood, peace, justice, better tomorrows, he sang for comradeship and against isolation, for joy and against gloom, for innocence and against cynicism. When in 1950 the rulers of paradise sentenced Eluard’s Prague friend, the surrealist Zalvis Kalandra, to death by hanging, Eluard suppressed his personal feelings of friendship for the sake of supra-personal ideals, and publicly declared his approval of his comrade’s execution. The hangman killed while the poet sang.

    And not just the poet. The whole period of Stalinist terror was a period of collective lyrical delirium. This has by now been completely forgotten but it is the crux of the matter. People like to say: Revolution is beautiful, it is only the terror arising from it which is evil. But this is not true. The evil is already present in the beautiful, hell is already contained in the dream of paradise and if we wish to understand the essence of hell we must examine the essence of the paradise from which it originated. It is extremely easy to condemn gulags, but to reject the totalitarianism poesy which leads to the gulag, by way of paradise is as difficult as ever. Nowadays, people all over the world unequivocally reject the idea of gulags, yet they are still willing to let themselves be hypnotized by totalitarian poesy and to march to new gulags to the tune of the same lyrical song piped by Eluard when he soared over Prague like the great archangel of the lyre, while the smoke of Kalandra’s body rose to the sky from the crematory chimney.

    PR: What is so characteristic of your prose is the constant confrontation of the private and the public. But not in the sense that private stories take place against a political backdrop, nor that political events encroach on private lives. Rather, you continually show that political events are governed by the same laws as private happenings, so that your prose is a kind of psychoanalysis of politics.

    MK: The metaphysics of man is the same in the private sphere as in the public one. Take the other theme of the book, forgetting. This is the great private problem of man: death as the loss of the self. But what is this self? It is the sum of everything we remember. Thus what terrifies us about death is not the loss of the past. Forgetting is a form of death ever present within life. This is the problem of my heroine, in desperately trying to preserve the vanishing memories of her beloved dead husband. But forgetting is also the great problem of politics. When a big power wants to deprive a small country of its national consciousness it uses the method of organized forgetting . This is what is currently happening in Bohemia. Contemporary Czech literature, insofar as it has any value at all, has not been printed for 12 years; 200 Czech writers have been proscribed, including the dead Franz Kafka; 145 Czech historians have been dismissed from their posts, history has been rewritten, monuments demolished. A nation which loses awareness of its past gradually loses its self. And so the political situation has brutally illuminated the ordinary metaphysical problem of forgetting that we face all the time, every day, without paying any attention. Politics unmasks the metaphysics of private life, private life unmasks the metaphysics of politics.

    PR: In the sixth part of your book of variations the main heroine, Tamina, reaches an island where there are only children. In the end they hound her to death. Is this a dream, a fairy tale, an allegory?

    MK: Nothing is more foreign to me than allegory, a story invented by the author in order to illustrate some thesis. Events, whether realistic or imaginary, must be significant in themselves, and the reader is meant to be naively seduced by their power and poetry. I have always been haunted by this image, and during one period of my life it kept recurring in my dreams: A person finds himself in a world of children, from which he cannot escape. And suddenly childhood, which we all lyricize and adore, reveals itself as pure horror. As a trap. This story is not allegory. But my book is a polyphony in which various stories mutually explain, illumine, complement each other. The basic event of the book is the story of totalitarianism, which deprives people of memory and thus retools them into a nation of children. All totalitarianisms do this. And perhaps our entire technical age does this, with its cult of the future, its indifference to the past and mistrust of thought. In the midst of a relentlessly juvenile society, an adult equipped with memory and irony feels like Tamina on the isle of children.

    PR: Almost all your novels, in fact all the individual parts of your latest book, find their denouement in great scenes of coitus. Even that part which goes by the innocent name of “Mother” is but one long scene of three-way sex, with a prologue and epilogue. What does sex mean to you as a novelist?

    MK: These days, when sexuality is no longer taboo, mere description, mere sexual confession, has become noticeably boring. How dated Lawrence seems, or even Henry Miller, with his lyricism of obscenity! And yet certain erotic passages of George Bataille have made a lasting impression on me. Perhaps it is because they are not lyrical but philosophic. You are right that, with me everything ends in great erotic scenes. I have the feeling that a scene of physical love generates an extremely sharp light which suddenly reveals the essence of characters and sums up their life situation. Hugo makes love to Tamina while she is desperately trying to think about lost vacations with her dead husband. The erotic scene is the focus where all the themes of the story converge and where its deepest secrets are located.

    PR: The last part, the seventh, actually deals with nothing but sexuality. Why does this part close the book rather than another, such as the much more dramatic sixth party in which the heroine dies?

    MK: Tamina dies, metaphorically speaking, amid the laughter of angels. Through the last section of the book, on the other hand, resounds the contrary kind of laugh, the kind heard when things lose their meaning. There is a certain imaginary dividing line beyond which things appear senseless and ridiculous. A person asks himself: Isn’t it nonsensical for me to get up in the morning? to go to work? to strive for anything? to belong to a nation just because I was born that way? Man lives in close proximity to this boundary, and can easily find himself on the other side. That boundary exists everywhere, in all areas of human life and even in the deepest, most biological of all: sexuality. And precisely because it is the deepest region of life the question posed to sexuality is the deepest question. This is why my book of variations can end with no variation but this.

    PR: Is this, then, the furthest point you have reached in your pessimism?

    MK: I am wary of the words pessimism and optimism. A novel does not assert anything; a novel searches and poses questions. I don’t know whether my nation will perish and I don’t know which of my characters is right. I invent stories, confront one with another, and by this means I ask questions. The stupidity of people comes from having an answer for everything. When Don Quixote went out in the world, that world turned into a mystery before his eyes. That is the legacy of the first European novel to the entire subsequent history of the novel. The novelist teaches the reader to comprehend the world as a question. There is wisdom and tolerance in that attitude. In a world built on sacrosanct certainties the novel is dead. The totalitarian world, whether founded on Marx, Islam or anything else, is a world of answers rather than questions. There, the novel has no place. In any case, it seems to me that all over the world people nowadays prefer to judge rather than to understand, to answer rather than ask, so that the voice of the novel can hardly be heard over the noisy foolishness of human certainties.

    October 2025 Update: Funny, when I was doing literary research about Kundera in the 1980s, I thought I had found all the interviews with Kundera. But here’s another interview I totally missed: NYT had another interview with Olga Carlisle in 1985 (May 19, 1985, Section 6, Page 72) which is equally delightful (Gift Link). Here are two fun quotes (the first is a joke):

    A Czech man requests a visa to emigrate. The official asks him, ”Where do you want to go?” ”It doesn’t matter,” the man replies. He is given a globe. ”Please, choose.” The man looks at the globe, turns it slowly and says, ”Don’t you have another globe?”

    Life when one can’t hide from the eyes of others – that is hell. Those who have lived in totalitarian countries know it, but that system only brings out, like a magnifying glass, the tendencies of all modern society. The devastation of nature; the decline of thinking and of art; bureaucratization, depersonalization; lack of respect before personal life. Without secrecy, nothing is possible – not love, not friendship.

  • RIP Author & Literary Blogger Jake Seliger(1983-2024)

    If there ever was a Pulitzer Prize for blogging, then certainly Jake Seliger would have won it hands down for this year’s blogging….

    On August 7 Jake Seliger died of cancer at the age of 40. He had been fighting it for a while and last summer he made the shocking announcement on his blog that the cancer was terminal and acting quickly. Amazingly, Jake and his wife were able to get experimental treatments to prolong his life, but this outcome was (by his own admission) preordained. Before last summer’s announcement, Jake was a frequent blogger who blogged about literary and social topics. Amazingly, despite his ailments, he blogged harder and deeper than ever before. Some of those posts from the previous year are about his illness — and somewhat hard to read — but often he blogged about the usual topics — as though cancer were just a figment of the imagination. I’ve been busy catching up on his old blogposts — he’s been blogging for over 17 years and will be uncovering some great posts from years past. Here’s a thoughtful post from exactly a year ago — before Jake would travel down that long and harrowing roller coaster ride.

    His wife Bess Stillman has been blogging on Substack during the year as well. When Jake enters hospice, his wife (a physician and also a great writer) talks about how she made her peace with the outcome and reflecting on his death.

    One of the most amazing things about this year is that in addition to all the writing, they have regularly taken selfies of themselves during these awful times. They are a beautiful testament to their marriage and fidelity. It was a pleasant surprise to learn that Bess is pregnant with Jake’s baby. They are at the bottom of their blogposts.

    I left a long message on his final post:

    This last year has been an amazing year of blogging! You have gone to places which I never thought possible (and yet you still have thrown in some “normal posts” as well). If there was a Pulitzer Prize for blogging, then certainly you would have won it hands down for this year’s blogging….

    Back in my late thirties, I was still pretty gungho about web technologies and working in IT. Recovering from a romantic breakup, experimenting with different kinds of storytelling, impatient with the retro-conservativism of the Bush Administration (lord, if only I knew what would be coming later). That was where I was at during that stage of life. I certainly wasn’t pondering mortality or stoicism or anything philosophical. I was rewatching the Blues Brothers, playing around with Python and cameras and trying to read Petrarch. It was shortly after that time that my reading dropped off significantly, though I have picked it up again in the last 5 years or so). In comparison, I feel as though you have traveled around the world several times (metaphorically speaking) while I was still learning how to walk. Of course, nobody could have predicted or sought out your path, and frankly good health and time is a luxury that people take for granted until they can’t.

    I’m glad to hear that Bess is expecting a child. How promising. I’ve been watching the charming TV series on Apple+, Lessons in Chemistry. One of the main characters dies unexpectedly in an early episode while the girlfriend is pregnant. By the end of the series, the baby grows up into a precocious little girl who is driven to find out more about her father (and stumbles upon some amazing insights into the man without ever meeting him). You’ve certainly led a full life — and your wife certainly will preserve your memories. I’m sure that will be enough material offline and online to appease your child’s curiosity about you when she grows older.

    As I said, I know that hospice is the next logical step (and yes, the final one), but from the perspective of a reader and fellow blogger, I feel as though my contact with you and your writing is only just beginning. I can see by the comments how many people your life and words have already touched (and WILL TOUCH). Thanks for generously sharing this last year with readers like me — even when it must have been painful and harrowing and exhausting. Please enjoy the rest of your time as best as you possibly can.

    I am glad I had time to give that final message — which hopefully Jake was able to read. It’s funny. I’ve been blogging for a few years longer than Jake, but I admit I never really felt obligated to post regularly. Sometimes weeks — and even months — have gone by without my posting a thing. In fact I have sometimes questioned the value of spending too much time on the blogging thing. (Similarly, I don’t post too much on social media even though I have streaks where I simply don’t shut up online). Part of the reason is that nobody really reads bloggers anymore (perhaps they never did), and blogging is something you do to document recent intellectual discoveries. I’ve going to be saying a LOT more about this topic in a longer post — stay tuned. Ha, ha, it will be a while before I write this post, but I’m pretty sure I will title it, “The Itch that must be scratched”.

    A year ago I started digging into Jake Seliger’s blog archives, but frankly, it will take a long time to go through everything.

    In the meantime, I’ve been digging through Jake’s blog archives — there’s a lot to discover or rediscover. Eventually I’ll do several megaposts on some of Jake’s literary stuff (which were always interesting and fun to read).

  • The Awesomeness Score: A Rubric for Measuring a Story’s Power

    I’m constantly trying to assess the value of story ideas and completed stories. As an editor, I want to pick stories that are the most inviting and enjoyable. As an author, I need a way to guess the story’s power and value before I write it — and after I write it.

    I can talk about aspects or values that a great story should have. Truthfully though a great story doesn’t need to have all of these aspects. Also prose and story structure are tightly integrated. You can’t just make something better unless you change everything. Sometimes that just isn’t possible. A story can succeed spectacularly well in one aspect and still be a mediocre story. You can have a great premise or a great character or a great plot twist, but the rest of the story can be so-so. Sometimes wit and eloquence makes a bad story great — or at least worth reading. Even a story may be lacking in some of the fundamentals (great style, succinct writing, memorable character, etc.) but still be a compelling read.

    A story could have great ideas or insights into humanity and still be dull. Conversely, a story can be fun to read or entertaining, and be utterly forgettable. Novelty — do you really need it? Some stories can be amazing and yet be predictable or unoriginal. A plot could be fascinating, but the protagonist could be wooden or speak in cliches.

    In education rubrics have taken over grades, especially in a subject as wishy washy as writing. You can’t really assign a numerical value to a work of art, but it’s nice to set criteria and assign relative importance to them. I prepared a literary rubric for evaluating stories by myself and others as a nice way to rank and compare. It’s possible that self-evaluations may be inherently flawed. Writers may be too close to their own work to be properly able to assign it a value. Even if I am scoring other people’s stories, I may appreciate certain story aspects that most readers don’t care about.

    I have spent a day or two coming up with a rubric or scale which I can live with.

    Primary Qualities: 1-5 points each x 3 (5-15 points)

    I picked 5 important criteria for scoring a story. I’d like to think that these criteria are independent of one another, but that is not exactly true. Sometimes what makes a story excellent in one aspect will make another aspect excellent as well. Also, some of these criteria attempt to be about intrinsic qualities, while others are more about the response they provoke in a reader. Let me list these quickly.

    I put primary qualities on a 5 point scale (with 5 being best). Then I multiplied the total by 3 (so a 4 would really be a 12, etc. ) Another thing. It’s often possible for a great story to be totally deficient in one criterion, so there’s nothing wrong with ranking such a story low on that quality. The point of this whole exercise is to provide a scoring system that allows unusual works to be rated highly. But no story can be everything.

    • Ease of Reading. A story published in 2024 needs to be inviting for the contemporary reader. The reader can’t be expected to work hard to get immersed in a story. Contemporary readers are impatient and lazy. They could be watching a movie or playing a video game. An ornate or unusual style (say something like Faulkner) can be appreciated for what it is, and maybe a reader can warm up to it, but the first duty for a story is to be read. Frankly, if you need to be a grad student with a free weekend to get into something, that is asking a lot. This involves a simple style, unambiguous meanings, brevity, apparent structure. So what about Proust? Faulkner? Joyce? Personally I’d rank most of Faulkner a 1, Proust a 2, Joyce a 1 or 2. On the other hand, Milan Kundera would be a 5; so would Stephen King and some of Kurt Vonnegut. On the other hand, I don’t think the stories of King or Vonnegut as inherently better, just different.
    • So what? Insights into the Human Condition? Why was a story worth the writer’s time to write (and the reader to read)? Ideally it should be clear what the reader learns about the human condition or the world after finishing the story. Often what the writer thinks may not be what the reader thinks, but isn’t it the writer’s job to justify the value of the story to the reader? By the end, the reader should be able to say, “This was important for me to read because …” Maybe there are uncertainties or no clear answers. Maybe the insight is that all insights are flawed or limited. Maybe the point of a story is simply to recognize that X is more important than Y. Underlying this is the sense that the story accurately conveyed some truth about the real world even though it’s just a story. It’s not always necessary for a story to convey truths about external reality. But it helps and certainly makes the reader feel that reading it was worth doing.
    • Insights into Character? It’s always great when a character or several characters strike you as life-life and memorable. The reader has to want to meet this character and see how and why he changed over time. Sure, a character may be a witch or a demon or a rat or a dead person, but the character should arouse some feeling in the reader (positive or negative), and the story should allow the reader to see how events change that character’s perspective. Sometimes an author can vary viewpoints in a longer story or novel and thus provide insights into more than one character. But it’s hard enough to portray just one character.
    • Enjoyment/Pleasure/Thrill. Basically a good story should have something amazing or sexy — something that makes the dreary act of reading worth it. It can be a fun plot point or an achievement by one of the characters. It can be a super power or revelation or a consummation of love. It can be a lovely fantasy or a sensual thrill or the unraveling of a mystery. I guess you could call it a “climax” or “resolution” or maybe just a transcendent moment. In truth though a number of stories don’t produce good feelings; they can be dark or sad or tragic. In those cases, the “pleasure of the text” can provide nothing more than a catharsis. Stories don’t need to bring some kind of literary high, but really it helps. If a story is grim or about a depressing subject like war, it can still be worth reading; it just won’t score high on this quality. Often this quality is delivered in a specific scene or chapter; it does not have to provide constant excitement or enjoyment.
    • Surprise/Suspense. A good story should offer something unexpected or disconcerting or shocking. It’s similar to suspense — not knowing what’s going to happen, but wanting to find out. The paradox is that you have to create expectations in order to subvert them. I could write a book loaded with surprises, but if I did that, nothing would be surprising. I have to create a baseline and a narrative pattern in order to subvert it. Are surprises or suspense always necessary? No, but they help the reader keep reading.

    So each primary quality has 1-5 points (all of which are multiplied by 3). Because you have 5 primary qualities, then the score range for all of them would be 25-75 points.

    Bonus: Nice to have qualities (0-4 points each)

    Below are some nice-to-have qualities for a story. They are not as crucial to making a story enjoyable. For this reason they can add from 0-4 bonus points to the overall score.

    • Style/Eloquence/Wit/Poetry/Verbal Pyrotechnics. Sometimes you can read something mediocre and yet still be wowed by the wit and eloquence. Sometimes it manifests as wit; sometimes it manifests as verbal ebullience or poetic descriptions. It is easy to recognize the wit in Oscar Wilde, or the ebullience of James Joyce or the careful language of Henry James. These qualities can sometimes make up for shortcomings in plot or character. As much as these qualities are a delight to find, they are not really required for a story (aside from a certain compactness). This was a lesson I learned late in my writing career. Not all sentences have to shine — especially if it’s a building block for a story or dramatic moment. Sometimes in fact this eloquence can be distracting or make a story hard to read. Proust and James and Joyce can be fun to read, but also strenuous.
    • Informative/Educational. Fiction can sometimes educate a reader about certain aspects of society or innovations or cultural habits that a reader wouldn’t normally come in contact with. A novel can bear witness or offer insight into how people turned out a certain way. Doctors can educate readers about diseases or what happens in a hospital; a computer expert can reveal the process to investigate a computer hacking. An erotic novel can reveal the strange kinks of certain couples. Sometimes this consciousness-raising has political significance. Sometimes the informational value of a literary work matters less than its aesthetic qualities. On the other hand, it can be fun to learn about new places and societies (real or imagined). A story can teach you about beauty pageants or prisons or Egyptology or skateboarding.
    • Worldbuilding — Sense of the World. Some fiction — especially science fiction or adventure novels — can present a world that is convincing and easy to imagine inhabiting. The ability to build a world within a novel can be a challenge. How do you describe a world and present the story simultaneously? Most readers don’t want to read a chapter that simply describes all the buildings and forests. The author typically doesn’t have that luxury. Instead the author must reveal things gradually while the plot is taking place. A good storyteller can do it in a way that doesn’t seem forced or slow. In movies worldbuilding has a lot to do with visuals and sound and special effects. But in fiction you have to mention just the right amount of detail that suggests a reality without drowning the reader in unnecessary detail.
    • Crazy Novelty. Sometimes a literary technique or story premise is so unusual that a reader will enjoy it as such (regardless of what it means or how well it is executed). Author Alberto Balengo wrote a story about a breakfast taco that takes over the world– maximum points for originality! But that does not make the story good or worth reading. Stories need to have a fresh perspective and relatable characters, but absolute novelty is not necessary (especially if it results in reader confusion). It’s a nice bonus, but that’s all.

    Subtractions: Undesirable qualities (0-3 Points)

    Here’s a list of qualities a story might possess that render them less interesting and beautiful and readable. This can be subjective, depending on the individual. I don’t know why I assigned 0-3 points for these qualities, except to mean that the presence of these qualities is not fatal for making a good story. But I think that most readers notice these shortcomings.

    • The Story Drags. There may be many reasons that a story may drag. There might be too much exposition, too much description, too much emphasis on minutia, too much dialogue, too much introspection. There’s a mismatch between what the author thinks is needed and what the reader thinks is needed. Sometimes in fact the reader’s laziness or inattention may be to blame. Often the underlying problem is that the reader is not sufficiently invested in the story or character to care about these details. Often this may be due to reader incompetence in constructing transitions. Sometimes a good story can have great parts and parts that drag. No story can maintain a high level of interest. Sometimes a little dullness is necessary to convey a sense of waiting and to throw out a number of details to distract from other important details. For example, a mystery needs to have enough red herrings to throw the reader off track. Perhaps the reader can truly gauge how much a story drags after finishing it. Maybe during the second read what seemed to drag now seems more interesting or important.
    • Cliched Emotions. Often a reader can anticipate what the emotional tone of a story will be. If the emotional stimulants or catharsis are too predictable, the reader can grow bored. Not every event or emotion needs to be a surprise, but if the emotional journey follows a predictable path, it becomes less important. Sometimes in fact a story needs to deliver exactly what is promised. Sometimes there is only a limited number of ways to express emotions in extreme situations. But the path to getting there needs to be interesting and insightful. If not, then the emotional reactions can seem forced and cliched.
    • Stereotyped Characters. Not every character needs to be unique and interesting. Secondary characters (flat characters) may have only one or two qualities which are revealed in a story. Sometimes an author has no choice but to include several characters which the reader will never need to know. Even the major characters can be predictable and easy to figure out. Some of this involves an author’s lack of effort or laziness; some of it may simply be that the character does not really need to be individualized. Think of a head cheerleader, an Arthurian knight, a janitor, an elderly Southern lady, an astronaut. I often hear that characters in sci fi novels are not memorable or individualized. Maybe so, but they do need to be for the story to work?

    Similar to the cliched emotions listed above, for the characters to come alive and be identifiable, they have to run counter to stereotype in some way. Think of who the head cheerleader at a high school who everyone wants to date. Did you think of her with the high school quarterback or some athlete? What about the head of the chess team? Or a lesbian? Or a dorky high musician in the high school jazz band? Maybe she doesn’t want to date at all? Maybe she wants to date a brooding poet? A protagonist can have simple or identifiable goals or desires, but the more that this character conforms to social expectations, the less likely the reader will find her to be complex and interesting.

    What this All Means

    So what is the point of this exercise?

    I recently edited a story collection by a distinguished author. I had to choose which stories would go into the anthology from dozens. I wanted to showcase the author’s best, yet many of the stories were uneven or even unpleasant. They were not bad stories per se, just not fun or enlightening to read. Some of the stories were maudlin or cruel or unimportant. (To be fair, some of these stories were written during the writer’s early years when he was still getting the hang of things). The scoring system provided a way for me to rank the stories among several criteria, and that was helpful. I ended up leaving a few low-ranked stories in the collection because they were so special and remarkable despite the low score. After I did this, I applied this scoring system to other story collections I edited (and to one I even wrote myself). I wanted to check whether the final score gibed with my impressions about the values of individual stories. Did some stories end up scoring higher than I would have thought? I thought I did a good job of creating criteria that could be considered independently. But sometimes a positive quality can be less important than one might think…or maybe it could even turn out to be a negative.

    This scoring system also gave me a way to evaluate or rank my own stories and story ideas. On another level, the scoring system and the formula —

    Total Score =3 X (SUM OF PRIMARY QUALITIES) + (SUM OF BONUS QUALITIES) – (SUM OF UNDESIRABLE QUALITIES)

    revealed my personal aesthetic and values for fiction. For example, I give more importance to Pleasure and Ease of Reading and less importance to Novelty and Eloquence and Information. I suspect that sci fi readers might reverse these things. Indeed, I’m not very sympathetic to genres like mystery (which is reflected mainly in how I designated the So What? criteria as a primary quality). A good detective story might entertain and inform, but it’s doubtful that it would reveal some deep existential truth.

    I could have changed the mathematical parts of this scoring formula. These are totally arbitrary things that reflect my intuition. Curiously, after scoring a group of stories one day, on another day I scored the same stories again — to see if a new day might have caused me to score them differently. Actually the way I scored seemed pretty consistent — although I feel pretty sure that another reader might assign a totally different score. This rubric is highly personal.

    Changing Literary Standards

    Over the last decade I have become aware of how literary standards have been changing. It has reached the point where I am no longer sure whether I know what a younger reader might consider good.

    Here are some things that seem to have changed.

    There’s a lot more overlap between “literary” and “genre” fiction. This is only a vague sense, but I feel like the typical genre story is much better written than it used to be. Also I find that a higher percent of stories are associated with a specific genre that not.

    Readers have become more female (in the USA). Silly me, I used to think that being an author was a masculine sport, but with more females going to college and studying the humanities and occupying prominent positions in the publishing world, the woman’s perspective is beginning to prevail. Who knows what that means? More family sagas, less swashbuckling, more fantasy over sci fi, less explicit sex. These are generalizations; perhaps I’m way offbase. I definitely am aware of how the feminization of the book world has changed how certain stories are received. It used to be that females would end up having to read a lot of male-centered fiction (especially before the 20th century) while male readers would generally ignore female authors. In that sense females would be more ambidextrous in being able to read both kinds of books. Now it seems that the tables have been turned; females no longer need to read traditionally male kinds of stories, and it is the male reader who needs to be more flexible about what he reads.

    More transmedia storytelling. (i.e., videogames, TV shows, movies). I guess I should be grateful that more studios are trying to adapt books to other mediums. In the 20th century it was probably true that authors adopted cinematic techniques in their narratives. But now it’s more than that. Books written today are not just incorporating cinematic storytelling effects, they are being written specifically to facilitate adaptation into another medium. Sure, when you’re adapting a novel, you need to rethink and even re-imagine a lot of things. But mainstream publishers gravitate towards works that are easy to adapt into other mediums. This is not a bad thing, but I think if a work has less drama and dialogue and more internal action, they are less likely to be touched by a big publisher. Conversely, I think there is more tolerance for literary works created for a specific shared universe (Marvel comics, Star Trek, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, etc.)

    More rehash of magic and literary tropes. Let me pick two phenomena to illustrate: Zombies and Time Travel. I simply fail to understand why so many books and TV shows are made about zombies. (I even wrote a funny story about the phenomenon). And yet they do. Time Travel continues to be popular if only because it is fun and easy to write. (Here’s my rant about time travel movies). Sure, it is fun to imagine some character in the past being handed information about what will happen 10 or 20 years later. All an author really needs to do is hand-waving about the technology, then do research about the time period being described.

    Zombies continues to be popular on TV and movies because they are soulless and therefore not deserving of human compassion. (The same for Daleks, and robots and such). So you can kill them all you want and never have to grapple with ethical questions. That turns all zombie stories into videogames.

    Magic and fantasy have a place in literary works even (especially?) for adults. But somehow having a magic potion or superpower seems less disruptive than time travel themes — which disrupt the very nature of narrative. In a way, when someone edits and sequences a movie or story, they are already moving time around to decide upon the optimal sequence — in terms of flashbacks and foreshadowing. They don’t need to insert a new system for going through time. I mean, when Rip Van Winkle fell asleep and awoke again, he was essentially travelling through time — and the author didn’t need to subvert physical reality.

    Personal Preferences

    I’m a fussy reader. Sometimes I dismiss certain types of stories because of what they are or appear to be. Some of it is based upon past experience. Some of it has to do with my peculiar emotional and intellectual needs. Also, I’m kind of lazy. I don’t want to read the same kind of story more than once. When I think that a story by an unknown author is going to use a familiar recipe, I toss it aside.

    Better authors often write variants of the same story over and over. That’s probably okay. Previous experience with an author can make a reader more amenable to whatever the author writes about — regardless of genre or subject matter. If Raymond Carver were to write a piece of hard science fiction or an erotica story, I’d be happy to read it — if only for curiosity’s sake. At the same time, if I were asked to read a Western novel or a vampire story, chances are that I will read it with condescension (or even contempt). I bring a lot of biases with me as a reader1.

    These reading biases may affect the way I score stories. It could potentially color the score I give for enjoyment/pleasure/thrill. Also ease of reading and crazy/novelty can be subjective. Ultimately though, these criteria — while dependent on individual reading biases to some extent, nonetheless can be assessed — especially in comparison with other stories. I might belong to the rarefied few who find pleasure and even thrill from reading a Henry James story, but how would my score on this criteria compare to a story by Philip K Dick or Stephen King or Max Schulman? Chances are, stories by these 3 authors would receive a higher score on that criteria even from someone who loves Henry James.

    In a way though, scoring a story depends on these individual preferences. My scores may not align with those of other readers (even if they are internally consistent). Even though I have tried my best to identify discrete criteria, other readers can come up with other meaningful criteria. Here (off the top of my head) are some alternative criteria for assessing a story’s awesomeness:

    • Ability to raise relevant social questions
    • Ability to highlight overlooked aspects of society
    • Ability to emotionally involve the reader (to stir romantic feelings or sadness)
    • Ability to expose the individual to harsh realities
    • Ability to explore the repercussions of a new technology or social phenomenon
    • Ability to help make an older time period seem real or fresh
    • Ability to get into the mind of a well-known figure from the past
    • Ability to expose the reader to a variety of perspectives with different value systems
    • Ability to teach an important life lesson.
    • Ability to convey an overall sense of the world (as absurd, beautiful, horrifying, etc.)
    • Ability to illustrate a fundamental spiritual truth of the world
    • Ability to introduce a mystery and show how the secret behind this mystery is solved

    These are all valid criteria for assessing a story, but they are more thematic and maybe more about consciousness-raising.

    In contrast, the criteria I proposed originally are more about techniques and whether a story elicits an emotional response. There’s some overlap between my criteria and the thematic criteria. For example, the So What? Insights into the Human Condition criteria encompass a lot of the thematic issues about justice and morality and social consciousness. On the other hand, I can imagine stories that rank highly on my criteria not being particularly effective at engaging with the themes listed above.

    One limitation of using thematic criteria is that it seems to encourage the writing of stories which check as many boxes as possible. A single story can’t be expected to do everything for all people. In fact, some stories are only good at doing one or two things very well. That’s perfectly all right. (Indeed, it seems to argue against tabulating an overall score regardless of the criteria).

    Criteria for Longer Forms and Different Media

    A longer and more expansive form like the novel offers more possibilities than a short story. The novel can contain stories, verse, dialogue, digressions, essays. It can alternate between characters and show their interactions. A good novel can tackle lots of different themes and moods and characters and conflicts without devolving into chaos. The best novels can sequence events in a way that seem natural and effortless. Perhaps the longer sprawling novels from the 19th century might seem unwieldly to 21st century readers, but then again, the 19th century didn’t have movies and Netflix to distract them.

    The “awesomeness” score I have introduced might work for short stories, but what about novels or movies? What about serial storytelling — which keeps expanding to include more characters and places and plots?

    Consider two examples of serial (transmedia) storytelling: Star Trek and Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Both began as very successful TV series, and then they branched out into other TV shows and episodes with different characters and plots. Now they have branched out into novels and graphic novels and by now probably audio plays and video games. Conversely, some classic literature has led to countless adaptations and serializations (King Arthur and Sherlock Holmes are two that come to mind).

    A novel is more self-contained (and easier to consider individually), but later novels in a series can benefit from having readymade characters and backstory from previous volumes. It’s no longer necessary to clutter a book with exposition. If everything is structured the right way, it becomes relatively easy to extend the storyverse indefinitely.

    Some criteria pertain mainly to the reading experience and a narrative’s textual qualities. Although movies and TV shows provide ample opportunity for witty dialogue and eloquence, written prose can also bring subjectivity, stream-of-consciousness and private thoughts. Diction and the very sequence of words can introduce mystery, ambiguity, attitude.

    On the other hand, some of these criteria apply equally well to the visual medium. Plot and character matter just as much in a movie as in a story or novel. So does pacing, novelty and the element of surprise.

    Similarly, if you wanted to invent an awesomeness score for visual storytelling, you can probably list some criteria specific to the genre — color, visual composition, production design, the flow of movement, the use of sound. You could also talk about the quality of acting and the overall ability to evoke a world.

    Conclusion: So what?!

    I already mentioned that I created this rubric for a very practical reason — trying to decide which stories to include in a story collection by Jack Matthews. (BTW, that ebook is called Boxes of Time more information here). But I expanded on the idea purely as an intellectual exercise — and perhaps for my entertainment and edification.

    I used the word “rubric” from education terminology, but the analogy is not quite precise. When a teacher makes a rubric, it implies that these are the main ways to score an assignment or test — and indeed, that students need to know what the rubric is when doing the assignment.

    But you can’t really do that when writing a story. I can’t just decide, “Hey, I’m going to write a story that is easy to read and high in suspense and insight into characters.” It doesn’t really help the writer to know beforehand what criteria is important for making a good story; you need a good story first!

    The writer (and I guess the AI chatbot) will generate lots of premises or characters or conflicts; that requires a certain level of talent. But it’s also important to intuit which ideas have legs — and can quickly run on their own volition. It’s impossible to know these things with 100% certainty unless you actually do it. There have been times when I have been less than enthusiastic about a story idea, but as I try to write it out, I find a lot of interesting things underneath the premise. I have been pleasantly surprised when this happens — and discover that I have turned out to have written a wonderful story — almost by accident. Let me clear: this does not happen often. Sometimes I begin with a semi-decent idea, and it just putters away into insignificance — (and I feel the guilt and shame of not having turned it into something better).

    It can be challenging to know how much time and energy to devote to a single idea. Time is very limited. Maybe the commercially successful author has enough financial stability to flesh out many story ideas regardless of the rewards, but most writers don’t have that luxury. They can only pursue a small subset of their dreams. So they better damn be sure that these are the ideas they absolutely want to write about.

    It’s not just for creative projects. What about essays or blogposts? (It is true, several times during the writing of this essay, I asked myself, shouldn’t I be doing X or Y instead?) You would think that in the creative world it is generally better to finish everything you do. But I abandon projects all the time — but sometimes not voluntarily. It just happens. Life becomes busy, and then when things settle down, I lack the motivation to pick the old thing up and flesh it out and polish it.

    The awesomeness rubric also serves as a reality check for my ongoing ideas and help me to prioritize my time. A score is just a number. It’s something I assign arbitrarily. But it’s also a temperature check to let me know whether I still think an ongoing idea still feels awesome.


    Notes:

    1. Despite my judginess, it’s fun to cleanse the palate by reading something light-hearted and unchallenging — and yes, occasionally I stumble upon something far more brilliant than I could have imagined. ↩︎
  • Poem: At Memphis Station by Johannes V. Jensen (1983-1950)

    Here is an English translation of a poem by Danish author Johannes V. Jensen (1873-19550) who won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1944. I found this translation in a 1923 collection of translated Danish verse.This translation was by U.S. Poet S. Foster Damon. All the translations in this collection are in the public domain in the U.S.A. Enjoy!

    (Update: Apparently the blog’s style sheets make it hard to make stanza breaks. Instead, I am adding periods between each stanza. Kludgy, but it works.

    At Memphis Station

    Half-awake and half-dozing,

    in an inward seawind of danaid dreams,

    I stand and gnash my teeth

    at Memphis Station, Tennessee.

    It is raining.

    .

    The night is so barren, extinguished,

    and the rain scourges the earth

    with a dark, idiotic energy.

    Everything is soggy and impassable.

    .

    Why are we held up, hour upon hour?

    Why should my destiny be stopped here?

    Have I fled rain and soul-corrosion

    in Denmark, India, and Japan,

    to be rain-bound, to rot, in Memphis,

    Tennessee, U.S. A.?

    .

    And now it dawns. Drearily light oozes

    down over this damp jail.

    The day uncovers mercilessly

    the frigid rails and all the black mud,

    the waiting-room with the slot-machine,

    orange peels, cigar-and match-stumps.

    The day grins through with spewing roof-gutters,

    and the infinite palings of rain,

    rain, say I, from heaven and to earth.

    .

    How deaf the world is, and immovable!

    How banal the Creator!

    And why do I go on paying dues

    at this plebeian sanatorium of an existence!

    .

    Stillness. See how the engine,

    the enormous machine, stands calmly and seethes;

    shrouding itself in smoke, it is patient.

    Light your pipe on a fasting heart,

    damn God, and swallow your sorrow!

    .

    Yet go and stay in Memphis!

    Your life, after all, is nothing but

    a sickening drift of rain, and your fate

    was always to be belated in some miserable waiting-room or other—

    Stay in Memphis, Tennessee!

    .

    For within one of these bill-shouting houses,

    happiness awaits you, happiness,

    if you can only gulp down your impatience—

    and here there is sleeping a buxom young girl

    with one ear lost in her hair;

    she will come to encounter you

    some fine day on the street,

    like a wave of fragrance,

    looking as though she knew you.

    .

    Is it not spring?

    Does the rain not fall richly?

    Is there not the sound of an amorous murmur,

    a long, subdued conversation of love mouth to mouth

    between the rain and the earth?

    The day began so sadly,

    but now, see the rainfall brighten!

    Do you not allow the day its right of battle?

    So now it is light. And there is a smell of mould

    from between the rusted underpinning of the platform

    mingled with the rain-dust’s rank breath—

    a suggestion of spring—

    is that no consolation?

    .

    And now see, see how the Mississippi

    in its bed of flooded forest

    wakes against the day!

    See how the titanic river revels in its twisting!

    How royally it dashes through its bends, and swings the rafts

    of trees and torn planks in its whirls!

    See how it twirls a huge stern-wheeler

    in its deluge-arms

    like a dancer,

    master of the floor!

    See the sunken headland—oh, what immense,primeval peace

    over the landscape of drowned forests!

    Do you not see how the current’s dawn-waters

    clothe themselves mile-broad in the day’s cheap light,

    and wander healthily under the teeming clouds!

    .

    Pull yourself together, irreconcilable man!

    Will you never forget that you have been promised Eternity?

    Will you grudge the earth its due, your poor gratitude?

    What would you do, with your heart of love?

    .

    Pull yourself together, and stay in Memphis;

    announce yourself in the market as a citizen;

    go in and insure yourself among the others;

    pay your premium of vulgarity,

    so that they can know they are safe, as regards you,

    and you will not be fired out of the club.

    Court the damosel with roses and gold rings,

    and begin your saw-mill, like other people.

    Yank on your rubbers regularly …

    Look about you, smoke your sapient pipe

    in sphinx-deserted Memphis …

    .

    Ah! there comes that miserable freight-train

    which has kept us waiting six hours.

    It rolls in slowly—with smashed sides;

    it pipes weakly; the cars limp on three wheels;

    and the broken roof drips with clay and slime.

    But in the tender, among the coals,

    lie four still forms

    covered with bloody coats.

    .

    Then our huge express-locomotive snorts;

    advances a little; stops, sighing deeply;

    and stands crouched for the leap. The track is clear.

    .

    And we travel onward

    through the flooded forest

    under the rain’s gaping sluices.

  • I’d Rather Be Reading T-shirt: Cheatsheet

    Yesterday I had a strange desire to buy one or more T-shirts that proudly proclaim that “I’d rather be reading.” 

    I don’t normally wear T-shirts and especially message-oriented T-shirts. Also, some T-shirts are downright uncomfortable, and the printing is substandard. Sometimes they shrink too much and don’t fit well. But occasionally I find a T-shirt that both looks and feels good, and I don’t get rid of it for years.

    But I really like a pro-reading message, especially one that’s not too cute or clever. I’m aiming for color and style and possibly elegance. I looked through lots of designs associated with this message and picked these three winners. I actually intend to return either the first or second, depending on how it fits. Each of these costs about $20 which is probably a little overpriced, but I need to check out what’s available at what price.

    The third design in teal comes from Teepublic. The first and second come from Amazon. Apparently according to this guy on Youtube, the Teepublic shirts (made of “100% combed ringspun cotton”)   are the softest and best-fitting; the Amazon shirts are in the middle of the pack. Other factors are certainly involved: do they shrink? Does the design on the material feel noticeably distinct from the rest of the shirt? Also, do the shirt colors fade gracefully? I shall test my purchases and report back.

    In terms of messaging, you can search for T-shirts by searching for “Bookworm” and “”books”. I actually found several interesting designs and pro-book messages after purchasing these 3.  I may purchase a few more over time. But the three designs shown above are general and overly simple and direct. I hemmed and hawwed about that third design, but I don’t know. I really like that faceless little guy carrying the books (and nearly bumping into the letters).

    Maybe people don’t realize this, but a lot of T-shirts are printed on the fly. That’s what both Teepublic and Amazon does, and probably all the others. It’s worth asking whether these things generally last and whether the raw material is using slave labor in some developing country. I shall report back about that as well.

    Clothing and Fitting Issues

    Here’s a nice introduction to T-shirt purchasing from the fashion and consumer point of view. If anything it explains terminology.

    Figuring out the size can be a challenge. There are several ways to measure your size, and you never know if the size is going to fit exactly. Trial and error is probably the main strategy you can take.

    I’m a Men’s XL size, but I’ve tried several XXL shirts that seem to fit me better.

    Washing and Caring for Your Shirt

    Recently I bought several shirts at my Goodwill, and I realize that I just need to take better care of my shirts. Everything will be washed in cold and dried as a delicate. I have no idea what effect this will have on the lifespan of these shirts.

    Wearing T-shirts — The Fashion Angle

    It’s not certain how often it is appropriate to wear a T-shirt in public. Certainly in Houston it depends on the weather. In the summer it’s very hot, and these T-shirts may seem too casual for most situations. I tried to choose T-shirts that didn’t look too ratty, but who knows how they will be in real life.

    I needed to buy several more shirts, and frankly, I have a bad habit of never throwing shirts away no matter how horrible they look. (I call them “inside shirts” because I wear them only in the privacy of my own home). Now that I bought some Goodwill shirts and have some Rather Be Reading T-shirts en route, I probably can throw away 10 old shirts and not significantly deplete my wardrobe.

    Conclusions

    I am toying with the idea of commissioning an artist to make a special “I’d Rather be Reading” shirt for Personville Press. Stay tuned.

    Jan 1 2024 Update! I love all the T-shirts. I notice that the Amazon sizes feel smaller than what I’m used to. I had to order XXL instead of the usual XL. (The sizes for Teepublic were fine). It’s true that the Teepublic shirt was slightly softer and more comfortable than Amazon’s shirts, but not by much (hardly noticeable). Despite what the reviewer said, I could certainly feel that the design parts of the shirt felt different, but all of them were comfortable. I did notice that the man with the books logo came out a lot larger on the shirt than expected. The black shirt with the open book looked the best — and it didn’t have too much lettering on it. So that’s now my favorite.

    Photos

    Author Robert Nagle in his "Id Rather be Reading" T-shirt, Jan 2024
  • A blogger prepares to say goodbye — Links, Links, Links

    [Clearly I will be writing a lot more about Seliger’s blog and related topics. This was something I threw together quickly after hearing the news last year. Here’s my thoughts right after about his death. Stay tuned for my adventures about digging through the archives of Jake’s blog!]

    A week ago I learned the terrible news that Jake Seliger, who ran the great blog Story’s Story blog, was afflicted with a terrible cancer and probably has weeks to live. Jake has been blogging since 2006 (translation: forever in blogging time), and I’ve been following his blog off and on for at last a decade, probably longer. I’ve emailed him several times and we share several literary obsessions and we’ve traded various book announcements. Jake has written two books, and I’m just getting to reading The Hook, which is an academic novel (a novel that takes place at a university, a subject that Jake found fascinating).

    Jake has always been a terrific blogger — and a prolific one too (unlike me). At certain times I used to read his blog every day or so. Then for a while, I stopped using RSS readers and my bookmarks got all disorganized. I totally forgot his blog for up to a year, then suddenly remembered and I was back to following him again (Hey, life is like that sometimes). Even this year, I would forget to check his blog, and then catch up several weeks. I had actually made a mental note to give a longer response to one or two of his posts, but haven’t had time in the past few weeks to do so.

    I don’t want to get too philosophical here, but it’s easy to take the status quo for granted. In the past few years, I had two college friends (Jay and Mary) pass away unexpectedly. I wouldn’t call either one close friends (mainly because these two people were very social people with an active circle of friends, and I was an introvert), but I certainly enjoyed their company, and for a time at college we hung around one another every day. We were in the same circle of friends, so we had a lot of common experiences. I could have spend a dandy weekend with either of them, and we could have had great fun. And I sure felt devastated when they were gone.

    Jake is in his late 30s. He got his master’s and Phd in English fairly quickly and then turned away from academia (presumably because of the lack of job opportunities). But he did a lot of grant writing and even started a business doing that for the last decade. I don’t know how much he enjoyed it, but it’s the sort of niche that people with literature backgrounds fall into, particularly because they can do it so well.

    I don’t really know Jake because I never met him, but I definitely know his blog and his writing style. This page (a work in progress) is going to contain some of the more interesting blogposts from Jake’s two blogs. For now, I just want to provide a series of annotated links (but I won’t be quoting). Maybe I’ll comment on them or respond to individual pieces in a later post.

    About his Illness

    • How do we evaluate our lives, at the end? What counts, what matters? “One estimate finds that about 117 billion anatomically modern humans have ever been born; I don’t know how accurate the “117 billion” number really is, but it seems reasonable enough, and about 8 billion people live now; in other words, around 7% of the humans who have ever lived are living now. I’ve had the privilege to be one.” (RJN: This beautiful farewell essay is designed to say all the important things. It’s really hard to follow that. Let’s see if Jake has the mental space left to post anything more after that).
    • I am dying of squamous cell carcinoma and the treatments that might save me just out reach. Besides breaking the bad news, this post argues for the “right to try” unproven forms of treatment.
    • What it’s like to be married to a dying man by his wife Bess Stillman M.D. A really profound reflection on the inevitability of loss and coping with it. Bess’s medical background ensures that Jake is now receiving the best care available. Bess is quite an accomplished storyteller herself; Her piece How to Say It (Youtube) is about how doctors are trained to talk about death around their patients. (also reproduced in Moth Presents: Occasional Magic which I bought a few years ago). Her Oath story starts with “I was 28 years old the first time I killed a man” (which tells about another the pressure of dealing with patients in crisis).

    Practical Guides

    • How Universities Work, or What I wish I’d Known Freshman Year: A Guide to American University Life for the Uninitiated (2010). Probably obvious to college graduates, this brilliant guide explains a lot of basic things about how colleges work and how to use it fully. (Bonus: Loved the reference to my former prof John Barth). “The biggest difference between a university and a high school is that universities are designed to create new knowledge, while high schools are designed to disseminate existing knowledge. That means universities give you far greater autonomy and in turn expect far more from you in terms of intellectual curiosity, personal interest, and maturity.”
    • How to get coaching, mentoring and attention. This is a great thought piece about why professors ignore certain kinds of students and how to focus on doing stuff rather than simply gaining some academic reward.

    Authors and Stuff

    I’ll be adding to this over time.

    Jake’s Books

    Jake published two novels about smart young adults. After starting The Hook, I’ve been reminded of the sharp satirical style of Tom Perotta — whom apparently Jake has written about and even met!

    • The Hook is a nice novel about a young academic. The Hook explores the love life and career of high school English teacher Scott Sole. Told in a series of short chapters which change from character to character — including a girlfriend who was a former student. Scott takes his job very seriously and is passionate about teaching, yet his private life becomes a topic of interest, especially because of his free-spirited ruminations on his blog. Eventually he is vilified after being wrongly accused by a female student. Reminiscent of Tom Perotta’s Election (both in terms of narrative structure and subject matter), this novel is both realistically told and probably an accurate representation of the unrealistic demands made upon teachers. Under this hypercritical (and hypocritical) eye, it’s hard for single adults (and particularly men) to survive. The novel is a scathing indictment of public morality, but also an interesting look at single life from the man’s perspective.
    • Asking Anna is “ comedy, in the tradition of Alain de Botton’s On Love and Nick Hornby’s High Fidelity, about how the baggage you bring on a trip isn’t just the kind packed in a suitcase.

  • Magical to Me: Childhood Books and their influence

    After I finished a gargantuan email interview with author Clay Reynolds last year (who died a few weeks later), I thought of a great question I wish I could have asked him. (The full Clay Reynolds interview is here). I love this question so much that I will pose it to every writer I interview. But first, I’m also going to answer my own question.

    Here is that question — and my answer to it follows below:

    WHAT BOOK OR BOOKS ENSNARED YOU WHEN YOU WERE YOUNG? WAS THERE A CERTAIN ONE THAT YOU RE-READ SEVERAL TIMES BECAUSE YOU LIKED IT SO MUCH? DID ANY OF THESE INFLUENCE THE WAY YOU WROTE OR APPROACHED LITERATURE LATER IN LIFE?

    I’m going to give a multi-part answer, grouped by grade level.

    Elementary School

    Back in elementary school, Scholastic Books were hitting the elementary schools — every few months the schools distributed sales catalogs which we would bring home to parents. Later I’d bring my order form (and a check from my parents) to the teacher, and a month later the books would arrive. That usually for me was a day of jubilation. I was eager to buy Snoopy books, and I almost always bought anything having to do with Greek myths (eventually moving onto the Iliad and Odyssey in middle school). Quite by accident I bought a book called Golden Phoenix and other French-Canadian Fairy Tales (archive.org , LT) by Marius Barbeau and Michael Hornyansky, Arthur Price (Illustrator). It was a cheap paperback, but all the stories were fun and moral and clever. The paperback Scholastic edition was called Magic Tree and Other Tales, and the illustrations were only black and white, but it was the same book.

    I loved reading myths and fairy tales. I also enjoy modern retelling of these tales; in fact, I once retold the Cinderella story in contemporary times where Cinderella was a man. Of course some people have taken the opposite tack — using the original setting of Greece and narrating the story with a modern sensibility.

    The great thing about myths and fairy tales is that they are so many different kinds. Maybe Greek and Roman myths seem familiar — and so do Grimm fairy tales, but I know almost nothing about African or Asian myths — to say nothing of Norse or Egyptian or Gaelic. You can find all sorts of myths and fairy tales on Project Gutenberg that most readers have never heard of.

    The French-Canadian fairy tales were fun and silly, and yet there were clearly identifiable protagonists (usually the youngest son or daughter) who messed up but eventually figured out the right thing to do at the end. The stories had a lot of redemption; In one story — the Sly Thief of Valenciennes, a successful thief was so good that he could steal anything — even from the King — without getting caught. The Sly Thief falls in love with the King’s daughter and has to learn that winning her heart is not as easy as stealing the priciest jewels. (I always remember the last line — after he marries the princess and becomes the King’s son-in-law, he realizes that the King had a method to steal as much as he wanted — it was called “taxes.” )

    Below is an illustration I love from “Sly Thief of Valenciennes.” The king hosts a 24 hour banquet in order to catch the sly thief red-handed. At the start, the king declares that it is expressly forbidden for any of the party’s attendants to talk to the king’s daughter after dinner, which the sly thief promptly does. The next morning, the sly thief discovers that the princess had secretly stamped his forehead with a cross made in indelible ink. To avoid being incriminated, he steals the ink and paints the same cross on everyone’s forehead while they were still asleep.

    Illustration by Arthur Price from the story Sly Thief of Valenciennes

    Middle School: Fantasy Worlds and Science Fiction

    By 6th grade I had become comfortable with school libraries and public libraries — even though I occasionally would buy books from the bookstore at the mall. I discovered the clever fantasy book, Norton Jester‘s Phantom Tollbooth (wiki). At the time I didn’t realize that the whole book was paying homage to Alice in Wonderland, but that’s okay; every chapter depicted some far-fetched absurd world. I loved every paragraph and every character of that book.

    Book cover - Phantom Tollbooth

    Phantom Tollbooth always has been my favorite childhood book. I liked the simple sequence of events and the fact that each successive chapter had a new “gimmick” which the narrator would learn about (A kingdom where people had to eat their words for dinner, a land where sounds were forbidden, a land where numbers would be mined from the ground, etc.) Each chapter introduced the reader to a new compartmentalized fantasy and then everything got mixed together in the finale.

    At about the same time I discovered the 5 book Prydain series by Lloyd Alexander. Like the Phantom Tollbooth, I learned about Alexander’s books by reading an excerpt in my middle school reading textbook and discovering with delight that the Houston Public Library carried all these books.

    book cover -- Lloyd Alexander's Book of Three. Fair use from Wikipedia

    To be honest, I avoid book series, and Lloyd Alexander’s Prydain series is one of the few series I have actually finished. Looking back, I never realized how common and archetypal some of the books’ elements are — the humble beginnings, the soulless creatures, the final battle. Reading through the Wikipedia page about the series and author, I see that the author borrowed a lot of elements from Welsh mythology even though the author grew up in Pennsylvania (spending some time in UK and Europe during World War 2).

    I read all 5 Prydain books several times. They were funny, magical, dark, sad and yes, scary. The main character is a young “assistant pig keeper” who somehow gets caught up in a campaign to protect the world against the Horned King and Arawn. By the time I got around to the Prydain books, I had already read some King Arthur tales and was vaguely aware of Lord of the Rings. I loved the parts with magic and strange creatures. There were lots of action and adventure and magic, but it remained highly readable. Also, the books didn’t feel especially hard or long. Each was about 150 pages!

    The series was well put together and mercifully short. (I could read any volume over a lazy weekend). When I reread the first two books recently, I was struck by how light the dialogue was and how rarely the narrator got inside the heads of each character. Some chapters were slow, but I knew that no chapter went on for more than 10-15 pages and that the action would certainly pick up by the next chapter. The reading level was fairly elementary, but as a young reader I never felt that the prose was too simple or basic; indeed, the Welsh names and unfamiliar words contributed to the magical otherworldly feel of it.

    Looking back on the series as an adult, I see a lot of world-building going on; perhaps the author started with a basic struggle, populated it with characters and then imagined the land they had to travel through. Then he provided a backstory for everything, some magical touches and finally a map. (Books about magical realms always seemed to have a map!)

    Map of Prydain land for Lloyd Alexander's fantasy series

    In 6th or 7th grade I hit my Robert Heinlein phase, starting with Tunnel in the Sky. I read a good amount of sci fi in middle school, and Heinlein had a lot of good sci fi books for that age group. This particular book was about a group of high school students studying to be astronauts. They were sent on some space travel portal to visit an unknown planet as a “survival test” to see if they could adapt to the environs. The test was only supposed to last 2 days, and then they would be returned to Earth. Alas, because of some technical malfunction or astronomical event, they didn’t get rescued for two years, and all sorts of things happened while they were stranded (there’s a little borrowing from Robinson Crusoe, a little Lord of the Rings, etc.) Great funny adventure. I have fond memories of reading it although it never was a masterpiece. On a lark, I made an interlibrary loan request for it a few years ago. It was still as entertaining as I remembered it. There was enough activity and plot to keep me reading, plus the dialogue was always funny and readable.

    I haven’t read anything like Tunnel in the Sky, but I recognized that essentially it was just a high school rite of passage novel. Sure there was science fiction and exploration added to it, but essentially it was just a bunch of high schoolers hanging out and having adventures. Formulaic yes, but the characters and the dialogue made it a fun read. From a writing point of view, the real challenge was letting characters do their things without slowing down the plot. At the beginning, in good Robinson Crusoe style, you were following one character, but as the chapters proceeded, more characters were added until at some point you were dealing with an entire civilization.

    In 7th grade I also read and loved Ray Bradbury‘s Martian Chronicles — which I was convinced was the best book ever written. By high school I had to revise that initial impression, but I have returned to that book many times — even as an adult.

    Ray Bradbury’s Martian Chronicles did influence my writing a lot. Bradbury was basically a short story writer who found a unifying theme to group stories around. Martian Chronicles was more of an anthology than anything coherent. It mixed humor with pathos and metaphysical speculation. One story (“There will Come Soft Rains”) didn’t have any characters at all; it was merely about an abandoned house which automated robots continued to maintain despite the disappearance of the human inhabitants. I really loved that story; it blew my mind! Other stories were about two people who saw reality completely differently and couldn’t reconcile their disagreements. Martian Chronicles was a great example about how to write a short story collection that people actually wanted to read.

    8th Grade Books that Freaked me Out!

    I sometimes read books which were too old for me, and 8th grade is that time when you want to read the adult stuff and find out all that you’ve been missing.

    My mother belonged to lots of book clubs, and sometimes I would read those titles, but honestly I don’t remember very much about them. They were mostly stories about ghosts and serial killers and that sort of thing: Amityville Horror, V.C. Andrews, Stephen King, etc. Also, I remember reading two very long books by Arthur Hailey: Airport and Hotel. I don’t remember much about these titles, except that they felt like the things that adults should read. These books were moderately interesting and informative, but they didn’t exactly sweep me off my feet.

    I guess I read some books about love and romance, but I don’t remember any (aside from occasional sci fi stories in Omni magazine or humor mags like National Lampoon or Mad). Some of the books did have sex in them — that was unavoidable — but it felt like the sort of PG stuff you’d see on TV. Typically the sex scenes lasted about 2 or 3 paragraphs, and then the novel would return to the regular story.

    But I distinctly remember three books from 8th grade that totally freaked me out — and still freak me out today.

    Childhood’s End by Arthur Clarke was a story about an alien race that travels to earth and seems to be friendly and altruistic. But it was never quite clear what ulterior motives these aliens may have had in visiting humans. Action and plot proceed slowly, but then the end of the novel was so unexpected that I literally had to reread it to make sure I had read it properly. I recently watched a limited TV series of the book. It was excellent and did a great job of portraying that strange ending.

    1984 by George Orwell. By that time I got around to reading it, I already knew that 1984 was a famous book and that it would contain lots of ideas and strange things. I knew that it was written by a staunch anti-communist and it was about doublespeak and dystopias, but aside from that, I went into it with no preconceived notions.

    The censorship and oppression didn’t freak me out so much as the revelation that the subversive book by Goldstein (which was essentially a book-within-a-book) turned out to be a fake book written by the Big Brother people to trap dissenters. Honestly, it never occurred to me that an oppressive government could be so dastardly.

    I also remembered the rats in Room 101 (who could forget that?) I had already read a few dystopian books intended for young readers, but it was genuinely frightening that Winston Smith actually saw five fingers on the man’s hand instead of four.

    Mysterious Stranger and Other Tales by Mark Twain. (Archive) I can’t remember where or when I bought this book, but I had heard that Mark Twain was a humor writer and I’d already read the Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County — which was mildly funny. I didn’t read the story collection from cover to cover, but I read a story a week.

    Two stories caught me by surprise: “Extract from Captain Stormfield’s Visit to Heaven” and “Mysterious Stranger.” “Extract from Captain Stormfield’s Visit to Heaven” was a comic misadventure of a captain who had died and had somehow figured out how to navigate to different galaxies in the afterlife. (Published in 1907, this Bangsian fantasy was one of the last things Twain had published even though he had written earlier drafts in 1873).

    On one level, it was a fun fantasy adventure. But it criticized religion’s notion of a heaven — or even an afterlife. Surely the way it is described by preachers and the Bible can’t come close to what it really might be (assuming that you believe in God, etc.) Twain’s heaven is a crowded vacation resort where most residents are bored or delusional or at the mercy of heavenly bureaucrats. The story tries hard to convey the smallness and quaintness of humans in this grand universe. At the beginning Captain Stormfield had arrived at the wrong galaxy and is met by overworked bureaucrats who don’t know what to do with him. Even when he is directed to the right solar system, he discovers that the population of Earth’s heaven is beyond his comprehension and that prophets and patriarchs are treated like celebrities who occasionally grace the world with their presence. Stormfield realizes that he is just an unimportant man to whom nobody pays attention, and the VIPs in heaven are people who were ignored during their lives.

    The second Twain work, “Mysterious Stranger” is actually an unfinished novel published after Twain’s death. The protagonist makes the acquaintance of a stranger who performs all sorts of magic tricks, but then admits to the protagonist that he is actually Satan. But Satan does not do evil per se. He sees human actions as venal and destructive; he is almost indignant about the terrible things humans do but at the same time views these events as inevitable. Occasionally Satan intervenes to help a good man escape harm, but it is clear that Satan merely decides to act by whim; he cannot and does not intervene every time some injustice occurs on earth. This god’s eye perspective of Satan views prejudice and hatred and exploitation as unavoidable realities. Satan decries the “moral sense” of humanity, claiming that it actually oppresses the world more than liberates it.

    It is a cynical and shocking tale. But the ending (which I will not reveal) exploded my sense of reality.

    Reading the story again as an adult, I see that Twain is pondering the nature of authorial omnipotence. The story teller can manipulate a universe just as easily as the Satan character could do in “Mysterious Stranger.” Indeed, a storyteller can even create Satan as a character in a story. Twain almost seems aware of the destructive potential of a world which can be manipulated to fit any ethical viewpoint. It’s hard though to pass judgment on Satan because culpability rests on context and foreknowledge; sometimes it’s just impossible to figure out which outcome is best from a utilitarian point of view. Introducing someone as Satan puts the reader on guard, but if Satan is creating illusions, then the Author must be Satan. Life is but a dream, but the dreamer might very well be the author … or even the reader!

    Flannery O’Connor once wrote: “Anybody who has survived his childhood has enough information about life to last him the rest of his days.” This is probably true. I’ll add that what I read before high school exposed me to lots of passion, obsession, philosophy, satire, duty, adventure and spirituality. Some of the books I mention here were unavoidable to kids growing up at the same time, but other books magically appeared at precisely the right time — exerting their influences over the decades. All are great books, but no one can read everything. If I were growing up today, I doubt that I would have even come across one of these titles. What you read is a function of where and when you are. The books mentioned here are not that magical to most people, but they are magical to me.

    Postscript: Movie Novelizations and Actual Scripts

    During middle school I am ashamed to have read a LOT of movie novelizations. During elementary school I read lots of novels which were originally Disney movies but were made into easy-to-read chapter books (they often include movie photo stills!) One Disney novelization I remember was The Strongest Man in the World starring Ken Russell. I ended up reading the book before watching the movie, but as it turns out the book was just a rehash of the movie and nothing more. In middle school I read the novelization of Star Wars and Alien. Actually I’m semi-glad I read the book version of Alien before I saw the movie so I knew what horrors the movie would hold when I eventually saw it. Also, I don’t regret reading the novelization of 2001: A Space Odyssey (written by the same Arthur Clarke who wrote the screenplay). The book even explained the ending better than the movie ever did — which may be good or bad depending on your literary tastes.

    In 8th grade I discovered an unclassifiable book: Monty Python and the Holy Grail (Book): Monty Python’s Second Film: A First Draft (1977). I had already discovered the Holy Grail movie in 1976 or 1977 and became obsessed with it (like most of the other nerdy middle schoolers in 7th and 8th grade at the time).

    But this book contained more just the Holy Grail script. They had reproduced the precursor to the script — warts and all. I thought the final movie screenplay (which was the second part of this book) was brilliant, but the early rough drafts were practically garbage — full of amazing ideas and jokes and sketches which bore absolutely no resemblance to the final product. For example, it included a lot of department store sketches which were axed and later found their way into various Flying Circus episodes. But the script also had tons of unfunny jokes, scenes which went on too long and pieces which were ultimately unfilmable.

    Even in the final script, I saw how much was cut or deleted or rewritten; you got to see the crossed out lines and handwritten revisions. It was fascinating to see what dialogue made it into the movie and what got cut.

    This book taught me two things: First, I realized that although the Monty Python people were brilliant and entertaining, their scripts were certainly not Shakespeare. They were almost embarrassing to read. At the time, I remember thinking that I could have easily written this kind of script even as a 14 year old. I lacked Oxford-inspired eloquence or the ability to compress the language, but there was essentially no difference between the funny sketches I was writing for friends and what the Monty Python guys were writing.

    Second, I realized how much effort went into trying to cut the ideas down to the bone. Some of their early ideas had potential, but I saw why they were ultimately axed. If the early script had been produced as is, it might have still been entertaining, but nowhere near as exciting as the finished product.

    I haven’t written many scripts (and honestly, I’d like to write more), but I have picked up a lot of experience editing my own prose and figuring out the most efficient way to convey a scene. The Holy Grail script was complex and needed to be edited with impeccable timing; seeing the early source material for the movie made me appreciate how much effort was made to turn rough ideas into a perfectly-oiled machine onscreen.

    I used to carry this book with me everywhere — even when I went to high school; I showed it off to all my friends and lent it several times. Sadly, it disappeared for some reason. I think one of the people I lent it to had lost it. I was crushed, but in fact, I had already read and reread this book a dozen times; this book had served its purpose admirably.

    Further Notes

    If you are an author and want to answer the question in your own way, please do! Either drop your thoughts or a URL in the comment section — along with a one sentence summary of things you’ve written. First time comments typically go into the moderation queue, but if it hasn’t been approved after a week, please send me an email ( idiotprogrammer AT fastmailbox.net) so I can make sure it is approved.

    Here’s a great list of best children’s books by School Library Journal. BBC compiled a list of the Top 100 Children’s Books.

    Choose your Own Adventure (CYOA) book series. This book series (targeted mainly to middle school readers) had a profound influence on my approach to storytelling and fiction. There’s only one catch — I didn’t stumble upon these crazy books until my late twenties, long after graduate school. Indeed, in the late 2010s I went on another reading binge where I read every CYOA volume from Houston Public Library and Harris County Library. (Gavin Jamieson revisits these CYOA novels and the crazy themes and narrative tricks they used).

    Other readings from elementary years. In 4th grade I read every single kind of sports biography — I had even bought a Scholastic kid’s biography of O.J. Simpson! Besides a few series (Danny Dunn, Mrs. Piggle Wiggle, Encyclopedia Brown, Peanuts, etc.) I thought Mrs. Coverlet’s Magicians by Mary Nash and Jason and the Money Tree by Sonia Levitin were great. I also read E.B. White’s Stuart Little, Wizard of Oz, Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle, Beverly Cleary, Judy Blume. Also From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler by E.L. Konigsburg, Little House on the Prairie by Laura Ingalls Wilder, (I unabashedly loved all the books in that series) Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH by Robert C. O’Brien, Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing by Judy Blume. Curiously, I never read Alice in Wonderland until my late thirties, which I would argue is the best time to appreciate that brilliant book. By 5th or 6th grade I had read both volumes of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory — my 4th or 5th grade teacher had read the book aloud to us every afternoon before the movie had even come out. I also enjoyed reading math puzzle books. I did not read a lot of comics — they struck me as stupid — but I read Peanuts comics religiously and Mad magazine semi-regularly. Oops, I totally forgot about the wonderful Great Brain series by John Dennis Fitzgerald which told the story of various immigrant families in Utah at the turn of the 20th century. Even though the stories were light-hearted and mischievous, they also provided historical perspective and a glimpse of religious differences (like Mormons vs. Catholics).

    More on Phantom Tollbooth. I really haven’t gushed enough about this wonderful novel. First, there’s an outstanding annotated edition of this book edited by Leonard Marcus. It gives so much backstory and interpretation. This book introduced me at an early age to the Terrible Trivium (a polite but terrifying creature who assigned people to do pointless tasks purely to waste time).

    Ogden Nash Poetry. Although I was exposed to some poetry at early ages (mostly Shel Silverstein, Dr. Seuss and maybe some Beatles song lyrics), I never really encountered poetry except as a quick lesson in English class. That was a mistake. Looking back, I probably could have warmed up more to poetry if only the right kind of poetry book had come my way. Actually I did run into a book or two by Ogden Nash, which were delightful and madcap. Sometime during middle school I kept a notebook where I copied down all my favorite poems by Ogden Nash (that was the 1970s when photocopy machines weren’t widely around). I used to love reciting these poems for fun. This was my favorite:

    ‘Procrastination is All of the Time’

    Torpor and sloth, torpor and sloth,
    These are the cooks that unseason the broth.
    Sloth and torp, slothor and torp
    The directest of bee-line ambitions can warp.
    He who is slothic, he who is troporal,
    Will not be promoted to sergeant or corporal.
    No torporer drowsy, no comatose slother
    Will make a good banker, not even an author.
    Torpor I deprecate, sloth I deplore,
    Torpor is tedious, sloth a bore.
    Sloth is a bore, torpor is tedious,
    Fifty parts comatose, fifty tragedious.
    How drear, on a planet redundant with woes,
    That sloth is not slumber, nor torpor repose.
    That the innocent joy of not getting things done
    Simmers sulkily down to plain not having fun.
    You smile in the morn like a bride in her bridalness
    At the thought of a day of nothing but idleness.
    By midday you’re slipping, by evening a lunatic,
    A perusing-the-newspapers-all-afternoonatic,
    Worn to a wraith from the half-hourly jount
    After glasses of water you didn’t want,
    And at last when onto your pallet you creep,
    You discover yourself too tired to sleep.

    O torpor and sloth, torpor and sloth,
    These are the cooks that unseason the broth,
    Torpor is harrowing, sloth it is irksome-
    Everyone ready? Let’s go out and worksome.

    What’s Missing in Tunnel in the Sky. Surely the plot must have included some G rated romance and possibly even marriage, but there was no sex on that planet apparently. Looking back, it seems risible that a bunch of high schoolers — male and female — would be stuck on a planet with nothing to occupy their time and it would not occur to any one of them to engage in hanky-panky. I never noticed this omission at the time, but reading it as an adult, it seemed very strange.

    Seeking Adult Fiction. Yes, I frequently would check out books from the library — in elementary, middle and high school. I pretty much read anything in the fiction department on the book shelves in elementary school. In middle school I checked out a lot of fiction titles from the school library, but by then my tastes had evolved to a point where I avoided anything that smacked of literature for children. Also, I am proud to say that I subscribed to Omni magazine in middle school. I didn’t make it a point to read the fiction published there, but often I did. I did discover Douglas Adams’ Hitchhikers’ Guide to the Galaxy in 7th grade and the sequels. For a while everyone was reading it, but nobody took it seriously as literature.

    There will come Soft Rains. (There are several excellent audio versions of Ray Bradbury’s story. I prefer the 1962 BBC version (dramatized by Nesta Pain). The 1977 version by Malcolm Clarke of the BBC Radiophonic Workshop(which sounds more high-tech) is also great but strange. Alas, the audio of this version is no longer online.

    William Blatty’s Exorcist. One book I read in high school which definitely did NOT freak me out was William Blatty’s The Exorcist, but not for the reasons you might think. I had already watched the (edited) version of the Exorcist on TV with my parents. They were both VERY Catholic, and indeed my dad went to Brooklyn Prep (a Jesuit high school) at about the same time Blatty did. So basically I knew what to expect. The book itself had a lot of scatology and historical information about exorcisms. It probably grossed me out more than anything, but it certainly didn’t shock me.

    Childhood Books Discovered as an Adult. I mentioned before that I only read Alice in Wonderland in adulthood and Exupery’s the Little Prince after college. I discovered the stories by Hans Christian Andersen in my late 20s and was struck by the similarities between his tales and Kafka’s. There’s a ton of public domain works for children which I haven’t really read. But I can report that Booth Tarkington’s Penrod (1914) is perhaps the funniest thing I have ever read. I can’t wait to read the two sequels (also in the public domain). Comic-wise, I discovered Big Nate series by Lincoln Pierce and (strangely) Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson. These two series are as good as if not better than Charles Schulz’s Peanuts.

    MYSTERIOUS STRANGER: That Ending. From the Wikipedia article, I learned about this fascinating book, Mark Twain and little Satan: the writing of The mysterious stranger (1963) by John Sutton Tuckey which tries to understand the controversy about which version of the unfinished text was closest to the author’s intention. Tuckey maintains that the “life is but a dream” ending was tacked on after Twain’s death, and that Twain himself hardly accepted this solipsistic perspective (p. 81) :

    Yet such an interpretation — that Twain’s art lost contact with Reality — must not be pushed too far. It has been noted that he could speak of a solipsistic view of life as someone’s “foible.” And he was probably more at home in the real world than his own words would sometimes suggest. Certainly he recognized the existence of other persons in the world. And it is greatly to his credit that he desired for them the same freedom that he claimed for himself. Dorothy Quick, who as a little girl enjoyed Mark Twain’s friendship, has related that once in 1908 when he took her to a circus, Mark Twain became somewhat melancholy after seeing an elephant perform upon cues from its trainer. He remarked that he always felt “sad to see anything brought down from its high estate — or something meant to be great that doesn’t know its own power.” (272) The elephant, he said, could probably have stampeded all the people who were present; however, it did not know its possibilities and so did tricks at the crack of a whip. And he was further saddened to think how many men were, like the elephant, unaware of their great powers. They toiled at low tasks, as they were ordered, although they had within them, all along, “the driving power of the universe.” (273) But he told Dorothy that she needn’t worry; that he knew his powers— and he would see to it that she knew hers. He was thus proposing to play, in actual life, the role of the mysterious stranger, revealing to a young person the limitless power of the creative mind. One of the things he told her was “No matter what happens, you must write,” (274) an injunction that eventually led to the writing of her book about Mark Twain.

    Mark Twain was the mysterious stranger. And he played his role wonderfully to the last.

    Flatland. I was also going to mention Edward Abbott’s Flatland as a book that influenced me as as well. But I wasn’t sure if I had read it before high school. Also when I originally read it I didn’t grasp its social and political messages. I reread it later in life and was struck by how profound and tragic it was. While the book is incredible on so many levels, I need to recommend the extraordinary 2007 movie adaptation directed by Ladd Ehlinger, Jr. (it’s free on YouTube).

    Robert Silverberg’s Lists. I came across two wonderful essays about childhood reading by sci fi author Robert Silverberg (which are included in his must-read Reflections and Refractions essay collection). A summary can’t do justice to these essays. But he mentioned several titles from PG: The Children of Odin: The Book of Northern Myths by Padraic Colum, Silvio and Bruno by Lewis Caroll (“It was Lewis Carroll’s rigorous, orderly, and logical exploration of the utterly incomprehensible, I think, that helped me to understand what science fiction (as opposed to fantasy) is all about”). The Three Mulla-mulgars by Walter De la Mare (W). I should mention in passing another beloved but obscure De La Mare title for children, Memoir of a Midget. (W)

    2025 Update. Here is a nostalgic essay I wrote about children’s fiction which appeared in the year I was born. Reading books intended for children when you are 60 can be eye-opening.

  • Reader’s Guide to the Fiction of Clay Reynolds (1949-2022): A Literary Appreciation

    Texas author Clay Reynolds was a literary giant who understood deeply what it meant to be a Texan. He was a great scholar of history and literature and also a dedicated teacher. His novels tackled all kinds of social issues of today and yesterday; they were populated with characters who could be lovely, offbeat or even detestable. But he could also find sympathetic and even heroic qualities in the most ordinary of people (such as with the Gil Hooley character in his novel Tentmaker). Reynolds pursued his art both brilliantly and relentlessly — and with humor and compassion. Reynold’s Texas stories reveal the complexity of character and the worlds they inhabited; these stories will be treasured for generations.

    By Robert Nagle, Blogger and Editor of Personville Press

    (Read my 10-part interview with Clay Reynolds, Wikipage article about Clay Reynolds, the author’s official home page and the obituary)

    At the end of this page is a list of the best Clay Reynolds books & essays to start off with. Several of Mr. Reynolds books were published as ebooks by Baen Books and are available on all major ebook stores. The official author page for Clay Reynolds contains lots of links to published essays and online articles. Several books (like Sandhill County Lines) are only available in print and can be bought on Amazon and other places. Sandhill County Lines is also an audiobook available on Audible and other places.

    Tony Daniel did an 80 minute interview with Reynolds for the Baen Free Radio Hour podcast.

    (Here is a 2017 reading Clay Reynolds gave where he tells a beautiful story about his father’s work as a railway man in a small Texas town).

    I came to know author Clay Reynolds during his last year of life. No, I never met the man or even talked to him on the phone, but we corresponded often over the last year about literary matters. We shared a few common friends on Facebook, and several years ago, after I noticed that there was no Wikipedia page about him, I offered to set one up for him (as I had done before for several Texas authors). It took more than a year for Mr. Reynolds to respond — at first, he was a bit suspicious, but he opened up a bit after learning that my Personville Press was named after a small town outside Dallas. Reynolds loved to write about small towns in Texas like Quanah, Texas where he grew up.

    As it turns out, Mr. Reynolds and I had many connections. Both of us passed through Trinity University (I had gotten my B.A. in 1988 and Reynolds had studied there as an undergraduate and received his master’s in 1974). By some miraculous coincidence, both of us took creative writing classes with playwright Eugene McKinney and were both ardent fans of the fiction of Robert Flynn (who taught fiction writing at Trinity and also used Texas as a backdrop for his fiction). As luck would have it, during the years I was at Trinity, Clay Reynolds had visited several times to give lectures about fiction — although strangely, I never knew about it at the time).

    Actually though, my first contact with Clay Reynolds came through book reviews he regularly wrote for the Houston Chronicle. Unbeknownst to me at the time, after my mom saw one of Reynolds’ book reviews in 1996, she bought the book and mailed it to me during me Peace Corps service in Albania. (That book happened to be Made in America: An Informal History of the English Language in the United States by Bill Bryson and was delightful).

    After Mr. Reynolds responded and I realized all the common connections, I suggested that in addition to writing the Wikipedia page article that I would like to interview him separately by email. Reynolds already had a long distinguished career in academia and publishing, and it was semi-scandalous that no Wikipedia page existed about him.

    Lone Star Literary Life had already done an in-depth interview with Mr. Reynolds in 2016, but it was clear that many more topics remained to be covered — and besides, Reynolds was the perfect interview subject because he would eagerly answer any question thrown at him. Indeed, purely as a pastime, Reynolds had answered over 1300 questions on the Quora.com website about history, culture, Texas, you name it. My email interview with Reynolds started in mid-January 2021 and ended in January 2022. The interview itself is about 45,000 words and will be released online on one of my websites by Summer, 2022.

    6 Interesting/Peculiar Things about Clay Reynolds

    He was loquacious about his own literary creations and the creative process itself. Many authors are reluctant to engage so openly in this kind of introspection. Not Reynolds. When Baen republished his titles as ebooks, he wrote 2 new prefaces — (one for Vox Populi, and one for Tentmaker — you can read them by clicking the Sample button on the book page to read it in a browser). Reynolds wrote a similar kind of preface essay for his Sandhill County Lines short story collection. He delivered an address about creativity and biography called “A Cow Can Moo” (PDF) . You get the point.

    Reynolds had an encyclopedic knowledge of literature and history. (He actually received his undergraduate degree in history and wrote his doctorate on literary history (American Social Drama in the 1930s). Just for the hell of it, during his retirement he liked to answer random questions about history on Quora.com He answered 1300 questions (with his last answer about the price of horses in the USA just before the advent of the car). He rarely asked questions on quora.com except one –what was the asking price for the street price of raw opium in 1916? (now that he asked it, I am kind of curious about the answer!)

    Reynolds had a knack for writing about people with rough edges. Critic John Pitchfork remarked that one of the best features of Reynolds fiction is “the recurrent pattern of tongue-tied and not very bright good old Texas boys courting the mystery of beauty they cannot understand nor resist.” Sandhill County Lines has tough rednecks (“A better class of people”), vulgar frat boys (Mexico), domineering parents (“The Prodigal”). (Don’t worry, it also has lots of kind-hearted people as well). One of my fave stories is “Nickelby” about an adjunct English professor who moves next door to a mean-tempered man who mistreats his dog and how her desire to protect the dog forces a confrontation. Tentmaker is populated with outlaws, prostitutes and all sorts of misfits.

    Reynolds was a stickler about historical accuracy in his old Western novels. He spent about 2 years researching the 1992 novel Franklin’s Crossing and did all kinds of field research to learn about dress, weapons, transportation. He visited the archives of a Tennessee hotel to learn what kinds of dinner they served. In the BAEN interview, he said he assumed that everybody ate steak in the 1870s only to find out that almost nobody could eat beef because it couldn’t be preserved (in contrast to fish, pork, fowl, which could be). He had no idea how big wagons were during that time (and how much they could hold) or how to use a saddle with a 19th century tack. This research also shows in his later novel, Tentmaker. (2002)

    6 Clay Reynolds works to start off with

    Clay Reynolds has written a ton of stuff. I have read only a fraction of them, but I sorta know what most of them are about. There’s enough to keep a bookworm busy for years (if not decades). Here’s some tips about how to get started. You can buy DRM-free ebooks of these titles directly at the baen.com website and print copies and also buy them at the same price on Amazon, Google, Apple, etc. Don’t be fooled by the lack of customer reviews of these books on Amazon. All are interesting and dramatic and beautiful.

    1. Of Snakes & sex & Playing in the Rain: Random Thoughts on Harmful Things (Baen 2013) This is a great and funny and poetic collection of personal essays about all sorts of topics ranging from “macho” topics (like trout fishing, golf, baseball, etc) to pop culture (Elvis, first dates, coffee, warning labels) to personal reflections about the legacy of long lost relatives. This is the perfect gift book for the I-Know-How-To-Read-But-I’d-never-be-caught-dead-reading-Proust-or-Faulkner-or-Morrison type of reader.

    2. The Vigil (1986) was his widely acclaimed first novel. It’s about a mother who loses her daughter in a Texas town. It received very positive reviews in the national press.

    3. Tentmaker (2012) is a historic novel about Gil Hooley, an ordinary fellow who travels to Texas in the late 19th century after his wife leaves him. He is (you guessed it) a tentmaker. After his wagon breaks down in the middle of nowhere, he decides to live in his tent. The novel is about the society which forms around him — including a brothel! — and how this emerging group tries to fend off various outlaws and calamities. The first chapter begins with a shocking and gruesome crime, and the rest of the novel alternates between the perspective of the outlaws and the various people trying to make a living around Hooley’s tent city. This novel was meticulously researched, has a lot of bawdy humor and does a great job of conjuring up what early settlements were like before they turned into actual towns. I love this book; as I said, the first few chapters are pretty gruesome, but it heads off into many unexpected directions.

    4. Sandhill County Lines (Stories) 2007 (No Ebook) If you can, try to listen to this audio book instead of reading it. Hearing captures the variety of dialects and speech patterns of various characters. My only “complaint” is that the stories are longer than the typical short story (ranging in the 15,000-25,000 word range). They feel almost like novellas. I love “Dogstar” which is about two state highway patrolmen investigating the death of a homeless man. The story “Bush League” is a great story about the love life of a talent scout for a professional baseball team. The opening story, “A Better Class of People” kind of appalled me when I first read it; it’s about rednecks who beat up some college students who happened to visit a bar one day. But when I heard it aloud on the audiobook, I really appreciated the subtle characterizations and gradual rise in dramatic tension. Also, the spoken dialogue is really masterful — simple, guttural, good at conveying anger and dread. (There’s no ebook edition of this collection, but the book is still in print and relatively cheap.)

    5. Ars Poetica: A Postmodern Parable (2003, Baen ebook, print book by Texas Review Press). No, I haven’t read it yet — so what do I know — but it’s an academic satire set in academic times about an aging poet in academia. Serious readers may groan at such books (hasn’t this subject been written to death? ) but I actually like the genre, and frankly Reynolds is precisely the type of author who is erudite and witty enough to pull it off. (Novelist George Garrett liked it a lot, and the novel eventually won a 2002 Texas Review literary prize.) I know 95% of readers may roll their eyes at the idea of reading another campus novel, but for fans of postmodern fiction and John Barth, this is our catnip.

    6. Vox Populi: Novel of the Common Man (2013) is basically a novel in stories in a much lighter and gentler vein. It shows how ordinary Texans interact with one another in various places: the flea market, the car wash, the lunch cafe; perhaps it lacks the melodrama or violence of the Sandhill stories, but it’s also a quirky, entertaining read. Texas Book Lover Michelle Newby Lancaster wrote a nice review of it (archived version), saying

    Clay Reynolds is uncannily skilled at rendering vignettes of strangers forced to occupy the same physical space. He is an astute observer of our smallest gestures and expressions and his dialogue is spot-on, complete with malapropisms that had me laughing aloud. His physical descriptions are detailed to an impressive degree. I could picture these people standing in front of me, to the last vivid detail. At the beginning of Vox, the nameless but not-quite-anonymous narrator seems to be a rather dull blank slate with no personality of his own and at the mercy of the seemingly stronger personalities surrounding him. As the sketches progress, though, our narrator begins to slowly but surely engage more substantively, confidently and empathetically – which is to say, successfully. It is a subtle performance. 

    Others? I confess that I have not read a lot of the other novels except maybe the blurbs. If you feel strongly about a novel, feel free to make a case for it in the comment section!

    Essays to Read Online

    Clay Reynolds has been diligent about publishing his essays, book reviews and academic articles online. (Really his website is full of great stuff). A lot of stuff from the 1980s and 1990s have not been digitized, but there are PDFs of some of his more interesting essays available.

    TV Pandemic Log II (2020-2022). (PDF) During COVID, Reynolds watched a lot of movies and TV shows (as did all of us). He kept an idiosyncratic journal of everything he watched, assigning it a score and giving it a capsule review. He watched stuff from almost all the streaming services (and noted which service they’re on– helpful! ) He watched an awful lot of mysteries and historical dramas — and was very critical about series that didn’t quite get the history right.

    Reaching the Summit: A Confession and a Valediction (PDF) (published in 2016) is one of Clay Reynolds’ most philosophical (and yes somber) essays. It’s about retirement and confronting the fact that the attainment of his intellectual and literary goals still leaves him unsatisfied.

    Bookish Topics: Literary Worth and Popular Tastes (2000) describes how the struggle between popular fiction and literary fiction has always been with us.

    Various Articles about College Life: Sexual Harassment and the Academy (1995). Long exploration of the legal and practical difficulties in trying to protect the rights of the victims and accused. The Real Crisis of Higher Education (2006) how the increasing cost plus lower standards are undermining the overall value of a college education. Trigger Warnings (2015) about the recent trend toward warning college students in advance about potentially disturbing texts. U No What I Meen: Technology and Illiteracy (2001) how Internet and technology is changing the way students learn. Campus
    Carry offers no benefit while increasing risks (2021)
    Reynolds signs up for a gun safety class and concludes that the Texas law to allow students to bring guns on campus will make no difference.

    Homage to “Mad Magazine” (2019) and how it affected a boy living in a small Texas town.

    History of a campaign that failed: The story of Sarah Palin, former Governator of a Really Big state, told by Clay Reynolds. (Satire) (PDF) October 2009. Sarah Palin was an easy target of satire; Reynolds took it to an entirely different plane by writing a monologue diatribe using Sarah Palin’s peculiar form of speaking. It perhaps is longer than it needs to be, but Reynolds had a great ear for speech patterns.

    From Castro to Cancun (2014). (PDF) Reynolds offered an eyewitness account of visiting Cuba at about the time that the Obama Administration loosened rules on travelling to that country. He said he enjoyed seeing the vintage cars on the road and thought the place was relatively free — though he felt certain that Cuba’s unique culture would soon be Americanized.

    Happy Reading!


  • Reading & romance: why book titles on your Facebook profile don’t matter

    (I posted this originally on Facebook on June 4, 2008. Here’s an archived copy on my own blog).

    Rachel Donadio on literary tastes:

    We’ve all been there. Or some of us have. Anyone who cares about books has at some point confronted the Pushkin problem: when a missed — or misguided — literary reference makes it chillingly clear that a romance is going nowhere fast. At least since Dante’s Paolo and Francesca fell in love over tales of Lancelot, literary taste has been a good shorthand for gauging compatibility. These days, thanks to social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace, listing your favorite books and authors is a crucial, if risky, part of self-branding. When it comes to online dating, even casual references can turn into deal breakers. Sussing out a date’s taste in books is “actually a pretty good way — as a sort of first pass — of getting a sense of someone,” said Anna Fels, a Manhattan psychiatrist and the author of “Necessary Dreams: Ambition in Women’s Changing Lives.” “It’s a bit of a Rorschach test.” To Fels (who happens to be married to the literary publisher and writer James Atlas), reading habits can be a rough indicator of other qualities. “It tells something about … their level of intellectual curiosity, what their style is,” Fels said. “It speaks to class, educational level.”

    James Collins, whose new novel, “Beginner’s Greek,” is about a man who falls for a woman he sees reading “The Magic Mountain” on a plane, recalled that after college, he was “infatuated” with a woman who had a copy of “The Unbearable Lightness of Being” on her bedside table. “I basically knew nothing about Kundera, but I remember thinking, ‘Uh-oh; trendy, bogus metaphysics, sex involving a bowler hat,’ and I never did think about the person the same way (and nothing ever happened),” he wrote in an e-mail message. “I know there were occasions when I just wrote people off completely because of what they were reading long before it ever got near the point of falling in or out of love: Baudrillard (way too pretentious), John Irving (way too middlebrow), Virginia Woolf (way too Virginia Woolf).” Come to think of it, Collins added, “I do know people who almost broke up” over “The Corrections” by Jonathan Franzen: “‘Overrated!’ ‘Brilliant!’ ‘Overrated!’ ‘Brilliant!’”

    (See also David Rothman’s March 30 post E-books, Pushkin and the dating bar and my note on Kundera below).

    Novels are no longer reliable cultural reference points in the dating sphere, except to indicate education level, free time availability and participation in book clubs.

    I have done online dating for several years on match.com and used to pay attention to book titles mentioned on ads. I made sure to namedrop a few highbrow titles on my own dating profile, but I don’t think it impressed anyone except myself. Most book titles listed on dating profiles indicated quasi-religious nonfiction (Your Best Life Now) or bland best sellers (Da Vinci Code) or cult classics (Ayn Rand, Tom Robbins) or titles read in college (Great Gatsby) or political diatribe (Ann Coulter) or light reading (Dave Barry) or middlebrow nonfiction (Malcolm Gladwell’s Blink). Oprah titles appear on woman’s dating profiles, which is neither surprising nor bad — just uninteresting. For bookish people, titles matter, but for nonbookish people, they simply refer to the latest cultural craze which the person has fallen victim to. I almost would prefer non-bookish people to leave this question blank rather than say something fake. If asked to name my favorite football team, I probably could come up with a recognizable team name (didn’t Green Bay win the Super Bowl recently?), but why fake an interest? I’m almost prefer dating profiles that give a glib nonanswer or a ridiculous book title ( 101 Eggplant Recipes or Pilates for Dummies). Books matter for some people, not for others. I accept that.

    I am still single, but even if Ms. Right shows up on the scene, I doubt she would know my favorite authors of the moment (Dino Buzzati, Felipe Alfau, Arnold Bennett) nor would I know hers. Wouldn’t it be enough just to meet someone who reads SOMETHING — anything– on a regular basis … if only because it implies tolerance for a book-saturated apartment. James Joyce once wrote that there is nothing sexier than a woman with a book in her hand. But who carries books around anymore? (I live in Houston, a place without decent mass transit, so the only place to carry around books is in the car). A female friend of mine used to hang around bookstores … partly for the coffee, but also for the chance to meet interesting men. But for the most part she rarely reads… except business books and fashion magazines. Nonetheless, she likes giving the impression of being a reader. I recall Bernard Malamud’s wonderful short story, a Summer’s Reading, where a teenage boy resolves to read 100 books over the summer and notices that people treat him more respectfully after he announces this goal .. regardless of whether he actually reads anything. At the end, when the boy has read nothing and his charade is nearly exposed by a neighborhood fellow, he heads off to the library and counts off 100 books at random. Malamud’s story ends with a question mark; will the boy actually read any of these books? Will he enjoy it? The reader of the short story wishes something wonderful will happen. Wouldn’t it be nice if the boy discovers a nice book about automobiles or a sci fi novel or a pornographic novel or a socialist diatribe or a history of the Civil War –something to shake this boy’s world up? In fact, the boy is unemployed, bored and restless. He could use an escape … and doesn’t realize such escape is even possible.

    100 Random Books

    I like to believe that 100 random  books would open up a new world for this boy, but the cynic in me predicts disappointment.  You can’t  pick up 100 books at random and suddenly expect your world to change. First, you have to be ready to occupy another person’s point of view. Even nonreaders have some ability to lose themselves in TV shows or movies; (my  bookstore-visiting friend who never read anything certainly  watches Netflix films). But  current dramatic genres take you back only so far.  Jane Austen? Forget about it … unless Emma Thompson stars in it. Cervantes, Ovid, Boccaccio.  How do you depict Zeus and Europa in a Hollywood  production without  awful  Cat-in-the-Hat live action or Disney-blandification? “Sorry, Zeus, your antics aren’t testing  too well in the heartland. The studio has decided to pass.”  (Maybe he could be a guest star  in a future South Park episode with John Lithgow doing  voiceover?)

    Many book stories are inherently unfilmable. Or maybe they can be adapted, but they don’t capture the internal thought processes or perspective of the protagonist. Or maybe the predominance of televised  genres  today emphasize or de-emphasize certain modes of living.  A society comfortable with watching  Time-Warner’s lavishly-decorated  Sex in the City is also comfortable watching CNN’s lavish presentation  of the Iraqi War as a high-ratings media extravaganza (there are even fancy cartoons military graphics to accompany the shock-and-awe pageantry).  An individual who reads will  see the world differently…he can imagine stories and dramatic situations without needing celebrity eye candy or lovely NY apartments to prettify  the vision.   When reading, you tend to compare your own thoughts with that of the character in the fictional world.  How are Proust’s thought processes different from your own? How are Ben Franklin’s practical thoughts about living any different from your own?  But with dramatic forms, the sympathy is external.  When you watch a movie or TV show, you are  prone to admire Carrie Bradshaw’s taste in shoes or  Pixar’s rendering of  the Paris sewers in the rat movie.  You observe, you pity, but you do not truly immerse yourself  (or compete with)  the character’s state of mind.

    As a writer and literary nut, I am  embarrassed to  meet educated-but-nonbookish  people who  read more than I do.  A flutist friend reads tons of classics for her bookclub; a  stay-at-home mom  reads feminist sci-fi; an old boss keeps  a stack of mysteries or thrillers on his desk.  I often do not recognize the titles or even the  genres they  rave about. Last weekend at a social function I talked to a pediatrician who was a Jane Austen fan.  Lots of Jane Austen fanatics are out there (not a surprise), but the pediatrician was overflowing with biographical details and critical insights from sustained reading.     As thrilled as I was  to meet a Bona Fide Reader,  it also made me feel small; after all,  I hardly spent free hours perusing  books about the measles.

    The Point of Reading

    The doctor and the flutist are readers; they are used to putting themselves into other people’s lives and turning their backs on commercial forms of entertainment.   Maybe mutual tastes in books do  lead  to romance in college;  Reading is  mandatory  for the college experience; if college students were required to learn Urdu or  python programming, these subjects could become the basis for flirtation as well. (See Note #2).  Over time, reading becomes  less useful for establishing personal connections   than helping the individual  to explore his own thoughts and values.   I just finished Remarque’s remarkable novel of postwar romance called Three Comrades. I doubt I will  meet anyone in meatspace who has enjoyed the novel–much less has heard of it. That is not important. You are totally missing the point.

    As I read Remarque’s book, I start reflecting. Did I share the narrator’s cynicism about love and ambition?  Were  the narrator’s mundane enjoyments (drinking with buddies, joy riding, etc)  the only honest  pleasures in life? (The protagonist remarks, “The smell of coffee made me more cheerful. I knew that from the war; it was never the big things that consoled one — it was always the unimportant, little things.”)  Was  the narrator’s giddiness about finding a girl justified (or was it  setting himself up for disappointment)? Do personal traumas (like fighting in a war)  brutalize the individual’s soul..or  make him better able to handle future  travails?  It is a deeply cynical novel….no wait, it is an honest portrayal of love’s decline. Does the protagonist find reason for  hope at the end? This book is not a glitzy tragedy; there are no Shakespearian conflicts or heroes  (except the ordinary heroism  of a person willing to suffer for the sake of his beloved). There are two scenes where the protagonist makes long journeys by car to bring his girlfriend to the sanitarium. It all seems so futile.  (Would I –or anyone else–have done the same thing?)  Did the story pass judgment on its characters?  Was it overly sentimental or not sentimental enough? Did I believe any person could go through life as jaded as the protagonist..and still manage to be happy?  I cannot say whether I loved this novel or found any great insights from it. I just don’t know.   I have finished the last page, but the journey is not over.   I am still wondering, going over various scenes in my head, trying to decide if the novel rings of truth or falsehood.  Remarque’s narrator says:

    It was the melancholy secret that reality can arouse desires but never satisfy them; that love begins with a human being but does not end in him; and that everything can be there; a human being, love, happiness, life — yet in some terrible way it is always insufficient, even as it grows.

    ********

    Note #1: I will now blithely dismiss any author who blithely dismisses Kundera’s ULOB. I wrote my undergraduate thesis on Kundera, so for a few years  I behaved like the world’s expert on the subject.  While taking  writing workshops at JHU, I  quoted  Kundera’s Art of the Novel so often that it became almost  a classroom jokes; later, after being fired by Rice University for sending a satirical letter to its library, I found parallels with the protagonist in Kundera’s The Joke–who is sentenced to several years of hard labor after sending a joke postcard to his girlfriend).    Kundera already understood what modern practitioners of the novel did not: you could use the novel to present complex metaphysical ideas to ordinary readers by segmenting themes into dozens of miniature stories.  Kundera’s novels  ( especially  his  latest novel, Ignorance) are full of paradoxes.  He used  the  social upheavals of communism as a counterpoint to  personal themes… but what happens when communism disappears? He used erotic themes to  engage a broad swathe of readers… but what happens when the author is  70 years old and past his sexual prime?  He used his own exile from Czechoslovakia as a metaphor for the boundaries that exist between people   (Kundera, like  Kadare and  Gao Xingjian were  exiles living in Paris, probably drinking at  the same cafes). But what happens when travel restrictions are lifted… and you can  go home  any time you want? Interesting and profound themes,  Mr. Collins. Hardly  “bogus metaphysics.”

    See also Lois Oppenheim’s interview with KunderaKundera’s essay on Feelings and Values or Jørn Boisen’s ruminations on Kundera and swimming pools ).

    Note #2: Classical scholar John Finley once said, “the only purpose of a college education is to reduce the time spent thinking about the opposite sex from 80% to 60%.”

  • Interview with Harvey Havel (Novelist)

    I first stumbled upon the novels of Harvey Havel during a recent ebook sale. Since that time, I’ve reviewed one of his novels and talked to him over the phone a few times. Personville Press is in the process of re-publishing ebook versions of two Havel novels which were previously released in print (apparently the original publishing company disappeared and left Havel hanging). Although born to Pakistani parents, Harvey doesn’t write about a lot of ethnic or immigrant themes (though he wrote a trilogy starting in Bangladash and ending in the USA). His novels are realistic and sometimes harrowing. He has dabbled in a lot of things — a memoir about the relationship with his mother and a series of philosophical/political essays about virtue and the fissures in US society. He has written about football players, poets and drug addicts. He has a great ear for how people really talk — especially those who are outcasts or down on their luck. Havel’s writing is hard to classify. His books describe the ordinary struggles of working class people — and perhaps his fiction comes off sounding strident. I’ve always been struck by Havel’s candor in describing life disappointments. Even in this interview, Havel is open about his personal demons and publishing woes. His literary output seems prodigious for someone who hasn’t turned 50. His prose has always struck me as more workmanlike than lyrical, but he’s great at telling an engaging story. In the interview Havel acknowledges a literary debt to Norman Mailer, but I see hints of Bellow’s chattiness, Steinbeck’s plain language and the William Kennedy’s stories about outcasts (in fact Havel lives in Albany and has crossed paths with Kennedy on more than one occasion). Born in Lahore in 1971, Harvey grew up in NYC and Western Connecticut, attended Trinity College and Emerson College creative writing program. He has done various kinds of jobs (mostly teaching). Harvey remains dedicated to writing novels even as he waits for the reading public to catch up. This interview was conducted by email over several months in 2020)

    Growing Up & Literary Influences

     WHAT WERE YOU DOING IN YOUR TWENTIES?

    Photo of Author Harvey Havel, 2020

    I had just finished college up in Hartford, Connecticut, and  on my 21st birthday, I decided to become a fiction writer.  I  was under the delusion  that, one day, I could become a  great American writer like  Hemingway and Mailer and Kerouac and my other literary heroes.  It was a recession that year, during the Presidency of George H.W. Bush, I remember.  I wanted nothing more than to avoid the shitty job market and go to writing school to avoid having to work.  I finished writing school in Boston in 1997, and after that, I went to New York City and frequented  places where artists and poets hung out, like the Bowery Poetry Club and the Nuyorican Poets Café.  I went to tons of open mikes in Manhattan and Brooklyn.  I carried a guitar around for a blind musician named “Norris” who was the lead singer for a band called the Ebony Hillbillies   (God, how I miss him)!  I worked very hard on my writing, but no one wanted to publish me at all, to my great disappointment.  I was crushed, because I thought I would be able to make a living at it. How wrong I was!   No one was interested in my work  except for Norris perhaps.  Thirty years later, I still can’t make a living from it.  The New York City artist’s scene didn’t treat me well at all.  I worked at CBS News on and off, and while doing so, other artists in New York City and even the high cost of living in nearby Bergen County, New Jersey basically chewed me up and spit me back out.  I also developed a terrible drinking problem that I still have to deal with.  I never want to experience those years again.  They were horrific.

    YOU RECEIVED A MASTER’S DEGREE IN CREATIVE WRITING FROM EMERSON. DID IT HELP YOU MUCH OR INFLUENCE YOUR APPROACH TO WRITING?  

    I actually learned a lot from writing school, but these types of MFA programs are very expensive, and there is plenty about these programs to which I now strongly object.  But when I arrived at Emerson, I thought I already knew how to write fiction better than everyone else there, like the typical smug, arrogant first-year writing student.  Actually, I really had no idea about how to write anything.  I used weak passive verbs, for instance, and I told more than I showed, for example.  Also, my style was hardly comprehensible, and one of my writing instructors had to do a complete line editing of my prose to show how none of my stuff made sense to anyone who understood the English language.  Very importantly, an experienced writer/student in one of my workshops said that my writing was rushed.  (Interestingly, another  local writer said essentially the same thing after reading my books a few weeks ago).  I should have listened to that guy in workshop way back when.

    But what I really got out of writing school had to be the direct advice from my writing instructors.  These were Christopher Keane, an accomplished screenwriter, Andre Dubus III, whose books they make into Hollywood movies now, and especially DeWitt Henry, whom I consider to be the most well-read and intelligent person I have ever met.   When I gave him my full-length manuscript for my first book, he told me the next day what was wrong with it, and his explanation took all but five minutes.   Five minutes!  The guy is amazing, and he was also the Executive Editor of Ploughshares back then too.   I’m serious, the guy has read every book ever published, or so it seems.  I’ve sent him every one of my books over the years.  I can only hope that he approves of them.

    Other than that, MFA programs are really what you make of them.   You can get by without lifting a finger, but then they become a real waste of time and money.  You gain the most just by learning one-on-one with professional writers.  

    HOW HAS “BOOK CULTURE” CHANGED SINCE YOU WERE IN COLLEGE? 

    As far as literary fiction is concerned, not a thing.  The same multicultural-themed books  that stress identity politics and political correctness have continued to be popular over the last 30 years.    Don’t get me wrong. Plenty of good writing is still studied at MFA programs.  Unfortunately, certain  themes, styles and subjects are stressed, while other great books are  ignored, buried, or forgotten.

    The real hope, though, is in commercial fiction.  More experimental fiction, science fiction, concept writing, and fantasy have taken off in recent years.  While I do see hope in these, the commercial fiction market is mostly driven by dollars and celebrity, just like the movie and TV  productions coming out of Hollywood.  Also, new technologies have revolutionized what writers can do.  Any writer can use writing in conjunction with any variety of technologies, like video and graphics, for instance, to create new literary art forms.  The Internet has made all that possible.  That’s not to mention the incredible rise of self-publishing, which is outpacing the nepotism that drives the traditional publishing industry and their corporate overlords.  These corporate houses are dying even as I answer this question, and it has been a long time coming.  They will never be able to penetrate the interpersonal networks that each self-published writer has already cultivated with  readers.  But at the same time, it will be more difficult for self-published writers to make a good living.  It is very hard, in fact, to do anything of the sort.  But at least it is a start, as the writer no longer has to acquiesce his or her creative freedom to the so-called literary elite of the publishing world.  It is a wonderful time for writers, and one of these days, the money will surely follow.

    I’VE GOTTEN TO THE POINT WHERE I DEFINE COMMERCIAL FICTION SIMPLY AS “WHATEVER DOESN’T WIN AWARDS OR GET REVIEWED IN THE NEW YORK TIMES.”  

    Many writers do view this amorphous genre known as “Commercial Fiction” differently, simply because it is so far and wide-reaching.  It is hard to narrow its focus or to categorize these books when it comes down to their type or subject matter.  But I think you’re right.  “Commercial Fiction” is the stuff that falls outside what’s in Poets and Writers Magazine or The New York Times Book Review or taught in MFA programs and writing workshops.  It doesn’t take into account  mystery or crime novels, espionage, horror, science fiction, romance, fantasy, and an entire host of other genres that are considered too low-brow to be designated as literary fiction.  Harold Bloom’s list of books in the American literary canon is generally considered to be “literary fiction” and therefore above “commercial fiction”.  There’s an assumed snobbery involved here, but it can be funny if one views it as a really absurd statement. 

    I remember really enjoying Anthony Lane’s yearly survey of books that made the New York Times’ best-seller list in the  New Yorker.   I had great laughs over these articles, usually published every year, as I remember them.  But folks in literary fiction often  look down upon their commercial fiction colleagues, and while this is a shame in many respects, commercial stuff makes so much more money for the publishing companies than the  literary books that often put people to sleep.  Hopefully, a good writer will be able to combine  literary talent with a capacity to entertain.  Great books can do both very well.

    The Literary Life

    I’VE GOTTEN STUCK ON SHORT STORIES FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS AND HAVE ONLY RECENTLY STARTED TO MAKE THE SHIFT TO LONGER FORMS. YET YOU DIVED ALMOST IMMEDIATELY INTO THE NOVEL (AND EVEN TRILOGIES). ARE YOU HAPPIER WORKING IN A MORE EXPANSIVE GENRE — OR DID YOU DO IT PRIMARILY FOR COMMERCIAL REASONS? 

    I never dove into writing long books for commercial reasons.  I simply wanted to be a great American writer, rich or poor.  I thought I couldn’t do that as a short story writer.  Actually, short-story writing is how an author is supposed to start.  You place several short pieces in magazines or journals.  You get noticed by an agent or an editor (or these days, an agent), and then you keep writing short pieces until you can put together a collection of your own.   Then, after you make a name for yourself among critics and industry insiders, you write your first novel.  I did everything in reverse, because I had unrealistic expectations and overvaulting ambition.  Yes, I wanted to be a great American writer, silly me, but as a result, I really found my element in   longer works despite having no readership to speak of.   I love immersing myself in large projects and not coming up for air for a while.  It turns out that no one’s going to buy long novels by an unknown author.  I have come to terms with the fact that I may never be commercially successful, but I still have hope that I will be a great writer.   I take it on faith.   I somehow have come to believe that many people will read my work and enjoy reading it one day long after I’m gone.  What else could a writer ever want but that?  Money means nothing compared to this.  

    DO YOU HAVE ADVICE  TO THE YOUNG WRITER (WHO PRESUMABLY WILL BE DEALING WITH DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGY, POLITICAL CONCERNS AND SOCIAL STRUCTURES).

    Make sure you pay the bills.  It is hard to write from a position of abject poverty, especially in a hyper-capitalist society such as ours.  Arts for art’s sake lost its validity a long time ago. Money speaks  louder  in this age than art.  I wish it were different, but it just doesn’t change, especially if we are members of the Western world.  Perhaps it has never changed.  Only a handful of authors make it, and this is nothing new in America.    So make sure to pay the bills, eat well, and live a good, healthy life so that you can live to write another day and not face the utter loss associated with poverty and sickness.  Keep yourself healthy and don’t forget that you have to live your life as well as write your greatest works.  There is no avoiding it.  Artists cannot live in a vacuum.  We still have to survive.  And always remember from  Hemingway that “living well is the best revenge.”

    ASIDE FROM THE FACT THAT EACH BOOK IS A DIFFERENT BEAST, HAVE YOU NOTICED ANY BIG CHANGES IN YOUR WRITING OVER THE DECADES? 

    Ever since I left writing school and departed from the world of literary fiction, I think my work has gotten somewhat less artistic,  more plot-oriented but easier to read.  I had figured the goal was more to entertain an audience and not weigh readers down with narratives that are too rich and grave with meaning.  My stories have gotten simpler, less complex, riskier in terms of what is considered to be  good taste, and less involved in what good books ought to be like.   My recent books have been much better researched, although  artistically they still leave  me unsatisfied. 

    IS YOUR UPCOMING 9/11 NOVEL THE FIRST YOU’VE HAD TO DO A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF RESEARCH ON? 

     I had to do a lot of research on the genocide in Bangladesh by West Pakistan in the 1970s for  Orphan of Mecca Trilogy, and also much research was done on Mister Big, which is a book about a football lineman and his fall from grace after an injury.  When I first started out writing, much of my work was simply creative and imaginative, but now, I am using research more and more to write my books.  I am currently doing this for The Queen of Intelligence, which is the September 11th book.  I find the research absolutely fascinating.  Now if  only  I could write the damn thing when the time comes to sit down and get to the real work. 

    WHAT KIND OF WRITING HABITS DO YOU HAVE?

    The rule of thumb is to write every day.  But we also have to make sure we don’t dip into poverty or illness because of it.  We still have to have shelter and food, good health, and the things we need to survive.  So I have always tried to write every day, but admittedly, I also have to pay the rent, do things for friends, read at events, go to the library and read books, comb the internet for news, take care of my sick parents, et cetera.  Writing every day is a good goal to have, but one shouldn’t forsake one’s quality of life or the needs of others in one’s life either.

    Right now, I am burnt out from publishing two books back-to-back.  Also, to make ends meet, I am editing manuscripts for money and doing research for my next novel about the events leading up to September 11th.  The editing takes up time, and the research will take up more time than that, maybe a year or two.  Then the actual writing of the next book starts, and who knows how long that will take.  So the rule of thumb is to write every day, yes, but we have to deal with certain realities too.   We can’t write all day, every day,  or else we’d end up with a humongous collection of unorganized work on a hard drive. It just doesn’t work that way.  I know some writers who are senior citizens who have manually typed works over the course of several decades, and now they have no idea where their work will go after they pass.  We have to be practical about balancing regular commitments with writing daily sometimes.

    Right now, I am not writing.  I am editing manuscripts and doing research, as I mentioned.  Back in the 1990s, as a young and naïve writer, I wrote for six hours a day.  I was a hermit who soon turned into a madman.  I had no life at all.  Be very careful to take care of yourself.  It is a much different world than it was during the writing industry’s hey-day of the 1950s.  Back then, a young writer could write for six to eight hours a day and get away with it.  Back then, getting paid for writing was much, much easier.

    I ONCE READ THAT CHARLES DICKENS TOOK LONG DAILY WALKS (AND SOMETIMES AT NIGHT). DO YOU FIND IT NECESSARY TO ENGAGE IN SOME KIND OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY OR HOBBY TO BE CREATIVE?  

    Taking long walks really helps. I get to think a lot. Sometimes I’ll listen to music or watch an inspiring movie, but other than that, not really.  For me, though, I just listen to music, sit at my desk, and cry!  Discipline usually works for me – just sit there and squeeze the blood out of my brain and onto the page, as  a writer once said.

    IF I READ ALL OF YOUR BOOKS  AND THEN SPENT THE AFTERNOON WITH YOU,  WHAT DO YOU THINK WOULD MOST SURPRISE ME? 

    Realizing how much of a manic-depressive I really am.  Even though the sun is shining, there is still gloom and doom hovering over us. I am a born schizophrenic who has been in 13 psych wards, spent 60 days in jail,  been to five alcohol rehabs, was at one time wealthy as a younger man, and  declared bankruptcy twice  (and might be headed to another).  

    You’d be very surprised to know that my high school class voted me “most likely to succeed” and how incredibly wrong they were.  You’d be surprised to know that I am an Indian/Pakistani, because you’d think I were Italian, Spanish, Mexican, or Portuguese visually, or at least a Black or White American from reading my books.  You would also notice that I talk a lot more about existential, real-life issues of survival rather than more flighty, intellectual issues and ideas (even though I spent my life thus far writing novels).  In other words, while we’re having dinner and discussing my books, I’d be worrying about how I’d pay my share of the check. 

     You’d also be surprised that I grew up partly in Alphabet City, New York, back when it was the most dangerous neighborhood in Manhattan – so dangerous  that taxi cabs wouldn’t pick up any customers there.  Maybe you’d even be surprised that I speak English at all and do not work pumping gas in New Jersey, or help my family run a shitty, roadside motel, or sell Lottery tickets, scratch-offs, and overpriced cigarettes at your local convenience store.  I think you’d be surprised that I actually wrote novels, short stories, and essays at all.  You’d probably think I had entered the country illegally by stowing away in the cargo hold of an Air India or PIA passenger jet.  And lastly, you never would have known that, when I was a young man just starting out as a writer at 21, I wanted to be just like Norman Mailer, and that I even acted like him back then too — to the rolling eyes of my wise writing instructors at my writing school.

    Being a Pakistani-American Author/The Immigrant Experience

    THE LITERARY WORLD (AND THE ARTS IN GENERAL) HAS ALWAYS SEEMED PRETTY ACCEPTING OF USA AUTHORS WHO WRITE ABOUT THE 1ST/2ND GENERATION IMMIGRANT EXPERIENCE. DOES BEING PAKISTANI-AMERICAN COME WITH A LOT OF BAGGAGE?

    I do not write about the Pakistani immigrant experience.  The subject doesn’t interest me at all.  I just write about everyday Americans and the American experience through mostly White-American and Black-American characters.  I do not write about Pakistani or Indian-Americans.  I did write about the Middle East, such as the Islamic religious/political thriller, The Imam.  I did write about the genocide in Bangladesh.  And I am working on a book about September 11th, which is set in the Middle East.  But other than that, the immigrant experience is hackneyed subject-matter that really ought to have been put to rest in the late 1990s.

    I am more interested in writing about the everyday struggles of black and white Americans.  There is no way I will ever land a publishing deal with a traditional publishing house because of it. I can make it fine on my own, by the grace of God.

    HOW DID FAMILY MEMBERS AND RELATIVES REACT TO YOUR WRITERLY AMBITIONS? 

    At first they laughed at it; now they are mostly angry.  They insist, at the age of 50, that I get a real job.  And because I don’t have a real job and have hardly any income, probably won’t ever get married, and don’t have any children, they treat me like a child.   But I love my parents dearly, and they reluctantly put up with me when I ask them for a loan every now and then or when I get into legal trouble.  But I get shit for it all the time.  I can still hear them yell at me to “get a job” or to make money instead of wasting my time writing novels.

    Orphan of Mecca Trilogy

    YOU SET VOLUME 1 OF ORPHAN OF MECCA TRILOGY DURING THE STRUGGLE FOR BANGLADESHI INDEPENDENCE. WHAT GOT YOU INTERESTED IN THAT?

    I had no idea that I would write about Bangladeshi Independence when I started the trilogy.  I simply had a picture of a young, barefooted orphan from Mecca, dirty from the streets, making it to our American shores somehow.  That’s all I wanted to write about.  The stuff about Bangladesh is more of an afterthought that follows that original concept.  At the time. I believe the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had already started, and the times demanded that I write something about the Islamic experience in America.  For some reason, like a Ouija board, the pointer guided the trilogy towards the subject matter of the creation of the nation of Bangladesh.  It was never my intention to write about it at the outset.  Weird, right? 

    DID YOU FIRST CONCEIVE OF IT AS THREE BOOKS? DID THE FINAL RESULT DIFFER MARKEDLY FROM HOW YOU FIRST IMAGINED IT? 

    I had a long book in mind, and it was simply a more practical matter that I divided the book into three parts.  I thought it would be more digestible that way, because each part was set in different places.  Part One is in East Pakistan and then Bangladesh, while Part Three is on the streets of America, for example.  It just makes the trilogy easier to read.  

    For some reason, though, I’ve always wanted to write long books like the pros always do.  (I have no idea why).  After I wrote Mister Big, one critic said that it was “comically long,” as though he knew of my secret desire to write the great long novel, like Les Miserables, War and Peace, or Moby Dick.  And so, embarrassed as I am to admit it, I did want Orphan to be a great, long trilogy.  I simply wrote these books all out at once and divided the entire long manuscript into three parts.  Isn’t that something an amateur would do?  Well, I’m still an amateur at this stage of the game, so as much as I hate to admit it, that’s what I did. 

    WRITING A BOOK (OR TRILOGY) TEACHES AN AUTHOR SOMETHING — MAYBE A LOT OF THINGS.  WHAT DID YOU LEARN ABOUT YOURSELF  FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF WRITING THIS TRILOGY.

    Endurance as an author, plain and simple.  I learned to endure the long book and to continue writing it even though I was terribly exhausted and had nowhere to take it.  Mister Big is the same way.  It is forced, ‘the mind bleeding on the page,’ as one poet put it long ago.  For some reason, I just had to squeeze my brain until it hurt, even though I have never been up to the task of writing a trilogy, of all things.  Trust me, the final result was not planned.  The readers of this trilogy ought to notice how each book that follows is shorter than the one before it.  That’s the author (myself) gasping for breath as I try to swim the last laps of the heat.  It was hard to write, and I really don’t mind admitting it.  Hey, “if the writer doesn’t suffer, the reader will,” and so, I suffered on purpose and maybe for no reason (if the reader turns out not to like it).

    Wild Gypsy of Arbor Hill: Romantic Delusions & Sexual Politics

    WHAT WAS THE EASIEST BOOK TO WRITE? THE HARDEST? 

    The Wild Gypsy of Arbor Hill, (my latest book) was the easiest to write.  A lot of it is based on a real character with whom I did have a real relationship, and it was the first time I had written a book based upon my own life experience.  I finally gave myself permission to do this.  All of my other books deal with issues that are important to me personally, but those books, their plots and their characters, are all imagined.  A lot of Gypsy really did  happen.  I wrote it quickly, and it was easier to write because the material was already there. 

    The hardest was probably The Thruway Killers.  I really tried to combine the writing of a good plot with real and well-rounded characters.  With literary fiction, plot usually follows character in terms of priorities in a novel.  But in this case, I tried to make them both important, because I really needed The Thruway Killers to be a good, entertaining read.  Luckily, the book was received well, and it turns out that the plot was probably the most inventive I’ve ever written.  I am better at developing characters than planning out strong plots.  I wanted to do both, and I hope the reader benefited from that.  It is very hard to do both successfully.  We usually get one or the other – character in literary fiction or plot in commercial fiction.  I wanted to do both, because I believe the most successful novels tend to go in that direction.

    WHAT PROTAGONIST OR CHARACTER VIEWPOINT HAS BEEN THE HARDEST TO WRITE? 

    My protagonists are usually flawed men, and I guess I can identify with that, because I am a flawed man, like every man is.  Male protagonists are the easiest to write for me. I guess I don’t have much experience writing female characters, so I would say that women are the toughest to write for me. But this is all about to change, because with the next book, The Queen of Intelligence, the protagonist is a female CIA asset.  The only protagonist that I came close to writing is in The Wild Gypsy of Arbor Hill and the character of Gypsy.  But while she may be considered to be the book’s protagonist, we actually see her through Charlie’s eyes.

    THE CENTRAL RELATIONSHIP OF CHARLIE AND GYPSY  IS FUNDAMENTALLY DYSFUNCTIONAL, AND YET CHARLIE  CONTINUES TO HOLD OUT HOPE THAT IT CAN BE SAVED. IT IS HARD TO WRITE LOVE STORIES THAT FEEL GENUINE TO THE READER. CAN YOU POINT TO ONE BOOK OR STORY WHICH OFFERS  THE SHARPEST INSIGHTS INTO   LOVE AND PASSION?   (FOR ME, IT WAS ARNOLD BENNETT’S OLD WIVES’ TALES — BLEW ME AWAY!)

     One of the harsh criticisms of the book is that its theme is really an old trope of how the woman in the relationship leads to the demise of the man.  And while there is truth to that, there is always the initial hope on the reader’s part  that the portrayed relationship eventually leads to a successful, everlasting love.  Because the outcome of a relationship like this is nothing new to fiction,  it wasn’t hard to make the writing of this love story  feel genuine. 

    I think of the movie Pretty Woman for some reason, starring Julia Roberts and Richard Gere.  This was more fairy tale than anything else, but it is my personal view that reality is usually quite the opposite.  Take Heathcliff and Catherine in Wuthering Heights or even Othello and Desdemona, a relationship doomed to failure, because we already know the outcome before we even begin. Love’s tragedy of this kind is much easier to write about and to feel genuine, because I believe it is much more prevalent in our world, and we remember it the most, because it hurts and is felt much more than love’s successes.  In that way, love’s failure is always much easier to write about in a genuine way.  Dysfunctional relationships and the need for a couple to preserve what they have permeates our world to a greater degree than the perfect couple and their perfect love and their perfect life.  It’s just never that easy.  Our most passionate relationships, in my humble view, are always star-crossed.  In that sense, no, it wasn’t hard for this book to try to feel genuine.  But whether or not the relationship in this book actually feels genuine is up to the reader to decide, ultimately.  I hope I did an adequate job of it.

    THERE IS A STRONG LEVEL OF ECONOMIC ALIENATION AND DESPERATION  IN  GYPSY.  WOULD  GREATER FINANCIAL SECURITY HAVE  BEEN SUFFICIENT TO HELP THE  PROTAGONIST REALIZE HIS ROMANTIC DREAMS (AT LEAST A SCALED VERSION OF IT)?  OR ARE ALL MEN (RICH AND POOR) EQUALLY SUSCEPTIBLE  TO THIS KIND OF ROMANTIC PROJECTION? 

    I don’t think money would have helped this relationship at all.  More money may have strung it out a little more and given them both a false sense of security, but a romantic dream is more about staying together even without any money, and deep down, a man already knows this.

    I remember in Albany, there was an elderly couple who lived in an old beat-up van and had street-parked it off Western Avenue in uptown Pine Hills.  When I saw them sitting in the front seats, their white hairs tangled messes and all of their earthly possessions piled up in the back of their van, I really thought that what I beheld was a couple that had fulfilled their romantic dreams.  Poverty couldn’t break this couple through  many years of being together.  They couldn’t exist living apart.  The couple had become one and needed each other so thoroughly that even through homelessness and hunger their love had survived.  Financial security may have helped them, but it didn’t necessarily aid or abet their romantic dreams any more than being totally broke, down and out, and being homeless in a van.  In my view, love is on a much higher level that transcends wealth, but then again, I’ve never been in love before, so I can’t really say.  I’m just lucky and privileged enough to see examples of it from time to time. 

    While money is important in any relationship, it really doesn’t mean anything to a man.  It isn’t the ultimate, in other words.  For a man, the opposite has to be true in order to  have his romantic dreams realized.  He desires a woman who will stick with him even when he’s broke and down and out, like the woman in the van did for her man.  And this wasn’t just a fucking fairy tale either!  It was real.

    THIS NOVEL SEEMS WRITTEN MORE FOR A MALE AUDIENCE THAN A FEMALE AUDIENCE. DO YOU AGREE?  WHAT’S THE MOST INTERESTING THING THAT A FEMALE READER COULD GAIN BY READING THIS NOVEL?  

    You’re right; I do think it is written more for a male audience than a female one.  Females don’t need Charlie.  It is usually the other way around.  Charlie needs Gypsy.  Heterosexual men hunger for a woman like Gypsy.  They need Gypsy to totally drive them crazy and nearly ruin their lives.  That’s why men love this kind of woman in the first place, and that’s how such a woman can easily control and overpower a man such as Charlie.  Also, men need to be touched by women.  They need to feel their skin upon theirs.  And because these sirens call, men are easily destroyed by women of this kind as well. 

    Most heterosexual men can relate, as literature is peppered with many great examples of this.  Nabokov’s Lolita comes to mind.  By reading this book, females would at least get an idea of how a woman’s attractiveness and a man’s hunger for her touch can equally destroy him and also lead to mistaken  attitudes about the women who offer their affections so easily.  In my view, women like Gypsy who offer what they do are men’s saviors.  Gypsy is the hero (heroine) of the book here.  Not Charlie, oddly enough.  And Gypsy is a tragic hero (heroine).  Maybe this is why females might  like and even learn from  this book, even if it may also offend their sensibilities, especially in this day and age.  When a woman turns cold, a man can’t survive.  Period.  All women need to learn this —  if they haven’t already.  Men would rather have a woman like Gypsy pretend that she loves him than go through the hellish nightmare of a woman’s cruelty.  Gypsy offers bliss, not cruelty, but in no way can something so sweet last for very long.

    Cultural Influences

    HAS TV OR FILM INFLUENCED YOUR WRITING MUCH? WHAT NON-BOOKISH THINGS HAVE EXERTED AN INFLUENCE ON YOUR BOOKS?

    Remember that book by Nick Hornsby, High Fidelity?  I grew up on all kinds of media.  I watched television all day and all night, like in that hit HBO comedy series Dream On.  I watched everything, and I listened to very loud rock and roll music constantly and repetitively.  I drove my poor mother nuts!  And I must have seen a thousand movies at the theaters.  I read mainly in school, but I also read many books outside of school too.  By the time I got to college, I was ready for the asylum.  

    At first, I had to write my books visually.  I wrote the movies that played in my head.  That’s how greatly movies and television influenced my writing.  I was all the visual image.  It was only over the last twenty years or so  that books took a clear and commanding role in my writing life.  Now I really can’t stand movies or television, and neither do I trust the two forms of media.  I trust books, and I am a certifiable news junkie.  In fact, my friends have to yell at me  to shut off the news and stay away from newspapers.  Nowadays,  I just turn on the TV for the noise.  It helps with the loneliness and the silence of writing.

     But politics and current affairs definitely shape my writing.  So does  my personal inability to win the woman of my dreams.  I have never been married, and I have never had children, mostly because of this stupid, ridiculous writing career.  But I have suffered much as a result of it, and one day I’m hoping to have great success after I’m dead and buried in the nearby cemetery.  

    IT ALMOST SEEMS THAT THE FASTEST WAY TO GET A STORY MADE INTO A MOVIE IS TO WRITE ABOUT A FAMOUS PERSON OR A NOTORIOUS CRIME. DOES THAT HORRIFY OR SURPRISE YOU? 

    Actually, the entire “New Journalism” movement was built on stories of notorious crimes and famous people, and the writers who penned such creative work are probably my favorites – Wolfe, Capote, Mailer, Vidal, etc.  For me, these are the greatest writers that America has ever produced, mainly based on their ability to infuse a social consciousness into their writing.  It was a new phenomenon, for instance, when Capote first penned In Cold Blood, and it really took off from there.  But this was in the 1950s and 1960s.  Also, this new form of journalism had been quite creative in its ability to deliver news items with the entertainment and artistic merit that the best fiction had provided.  It was quite a time when the first New Journalists rose to prominence in American fiction.

    But movies are different.  Biopics about famous people have always been staples of the film industry, so it doesn’t surprise me at all that screenplays are often made based on the lives of famous people.  When I was much younger, I used to love going to these biopics and thinking that, one day, I could be like the persons depicted on the screens.  And of course, these portrayals are usually highly romanticized, almost heroic, depending on who these people are.  Nothing of the sort ever happened in my life, but watching these biopics did, nevertheless, inspire me to follow my dreams and pursue all of the things that landed me into a lot of trouble later in life!  But I don’t think one has to write about a famous person or a notorious crime to get a story made into a Hollywood movie.  

    Getting a screenplay accepted by an agent or a film studio, (let alone having that movie greenlighted), is a one-in-a-million chance in itself.  It’s like winning the lottery.  But if a nascent screenwriter really believes in him or herself, I would say go for it, but knowing full-well that he or she shouldn’t bet the house on it.  Movies are tough to make in general, and instead of just writing a screenplay for it, it would be much better if the writer also raised or borrowed the funds to hire the director and the actors to produce the damn thing on his or her own.  This would be the far better route as well as the fastest – not necessarily by writing about a famous person or a notorious crime.  Because in my opinion, it’s the story that matters, not the subject.  

    YOUR FICTION HAS  ADEPTLY  TACKLED SOCIAL AND POLITICAL ISSUES.  DO YOU WORRY ABOUT SOUNDING TOO PREACHY? 

    When I wrote my first book, Noble McCloud, one reviewer didn’t like the book at all and remarked (paraphrasing Louis Mayer), “if you want to send a message, send it Western Union.”  Back then, I was heavily involved in politics, and I considered myself an activist just like most other writers and artists in New York City during the neo-liberal heyday of the 1990s.  But after I received that criticism, I really believed that the critic was right, and so now I try to avoid social messages that interfere with or supersede the stories and the characters I am writing about.  If I do want to establish a political point of view, though, there are many ways to do it using subtler means than the type of overt moralism that used to mar my earlier work.  While I am still proud of that earlier work, I should have toned it down  for the reader. 

    CAN YOU NAME A NOVEL BY SOMEONE ELSE  WHICH ACHIEVES THE OPTIMAL BALANCE BETWEEN THE ARTISTIC AND THE POLITICAL? 

    I love, really love, Norman Mailer’s work. That whole post World War II generation is where my true heroes lie.  And from the other end of the political spectrum, even Thom Wolfe’s satirical fiction is excellent.  Allen Ginsberg’s Howl is another good example, although that’s poetry, with his view of “Moloch” and other interjections of political and cultural outrage.  There’s the great Arthur Koestler, Frank Norris,  and John Steinbeck, and we can even go far back as Hawthorne in The Scarlet Letter and Ambrose Bierce’s The Devil’s Dictionary.  And that’s not to mention the Black American writers, such as Wright, Baldwin, Ellison, Wideman, Morrison, Baraka, Hughes, and almost every writer of the Harlem Renaissance and beyond. 

    Then there’s Orwell, Kipling, and especially Athol Fugard who railed  vehemently against imperialism and colonialism of any kind, There’s tons of British stuff that’s centuries old, like Jonathan Swift, and mountains of stuff from Europe, like Kafka, Zola, Hugo, and Dostoyevsky. One of the primary motivations of any writer is to comment on political conditions of his or her time.  If we were to complicate things and talk about literary theory, we can even see texts through a political lens.  Politics, arguably, is the most exciting lens through which to view any literary work.  I’m all for it!

    Science fiction can often do that as  well. 

    Sci fi  writers can criticize the hell out of any society or political condition and advance plenty of political and philosophical ideas, which is why I love reading them from time to time.  I have written several science fiction stories, which I have submitted to magazines, but nothing ever came of them.  Mostly  Kafkaesque stories that I haven’t had time to look over yet or revise.  But I would love to write more.  It is important for a writer to be inventive, as  science fiction stories often are.  They don’t always have to involve space, technology, or science either. 

    Staying Sane in a Covid-Infected World

    WHAT QUESTION DO YOU ASK YOURSELF THE MOST? 

    Where are all the women?  When do I get to drink all the booze without any consequences?  Where’s the good life that had been promised to all writers?  When do I become the rich and famous author featured on the cover of GQ Magazine?  In other words, where is the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow?  Well, I’m definitely not traveling along the arc of a rainbow, and there is definitely not a pot of gold at the end of this journey.  Quite the opposite, I’m afraid, but a job well done so far, if I could say something in my defense.

    WHAT HAS SURPRISED YOU THE MOST ABOUT THE COVID CRISIS? HOW ARE YOU ADAPTING? IS THERE ANY KIND OF ACTIVITY YOU ARE EAGER TO DO AFTER THIS DAMN THING IS BEHIND US? 

    Actually I  found it very easy to adapt to the COVID crisis.  I found myself complaining very little, doing what our leaders told us to do, and keeping my big mouth shut.  Of course, it is not over yet.  The first thing I want to do is attend a reading at the NYS Writers Institute here in Albany.  And then, I want to go to a reading where my poet friends are.

    HAVE THERE BEEN OCCASIONS WHERE THE STRUGGLES OF A WRITER’S LIFE REALLY GOT TO YOU? HOW DO YOU THINK THAT YOU’VE MANAGED TO STAY IN THE GAME?  

    Every day it gets to me.  It’s all I think about.  The writer’s life is rife with misery and suffering.  It promises nothing and tells us to like it.  It’s dark. It’s the road less traveled without the sunlight of happiness on it.  

    And if some young kid comes up to me and asks if he or she should be a writer, I would tell that kid to get a job and earn  his daily bread first before trying anything so stupid.  Yes, there is a lot of regret in it, and with every word I write there is a new struggle. 

    But I’ve managed to stay a writer for so long because (thank God) I have had a fixed income and an education that gets me by every month, made possible by my parents who came to this country and endured much hardship to provide a good secure life for me.  Secondly, because I am disabled, I receive some Social Security income.  So, even though I can’t work, I do get help for living expenses  from a government to whom I am forever indebted and grateful, (even though I have criticized the hell out of it every day of my life).  But aside from that, I have stayed in the game, because I am really not geared for anything else.  I remember reading a survey in a literary magazine that covered what all of these rich and famous artists would be doing if they suddenly had a real job.  Poet Donald Justice said that the only thing he could really do was operate a small drawbridge.  See, I’m much the same way, because once you start writing full time, good luck trying to be competent in anything else!   Once a writer, always a writer.  Get out while you can! 


    Robert Nagle is founder of Personville Press and has been blogging for more than 20 years. He has done extended interviews with a literary giant, a songwriter and a movie critic. He writes a semi-regular column (Robert’s Roundup) about low-priced indie ebooks.

  • My Literary Shame

    As an ebook lover, it may surprise people to learn how attached I am to my book collection. They are like pets or longtime companions. I don’t feel nostalgic about books — I gave away all my pre-1923 books without guilt. But some (many!) books are there to remind me of my longtime ambitions to read these things. Alas, the years ago go by, I know that I will never be able to read everything, but I still I still have time to read a lot. Here are the books that regularly shame me into reading them.

    MY LITERARY SHAME #1: Last night I was talking to an uncle of mine about books. After he mentioned “the rabbit book,” I knew immediately that 1)he was talking about WATERSHIP DOWN by Richard Adams, 2)that I had owned a copy of the book for at least 2/3 of my life without reading it and 3)in the last month I had grabbed my copy of it out of storage with the determination to actually read it this time. Will I read it? Time will only tell; and here’s a photo to mark my shame.

    (more…)
  • Tips & Advice for New & Indie Authors

    (Jan 2026 Update). I made a More Publishing Tips post which sketches out my latest publishing strategies. The post you are reading has a lot of detail — perhaps too much. Also, I occasionally edit and format ebooks by other people. (here’s my rate sheet for this service).

    This single post has become overlong.

    General Observations

    Writing Habits and Goals

    Ebook Formatting and Quality Control

    Ebook Covers — Value and Technical Requirements

    Promotional Strategies — Branding, Targeting, Audience Building

    Getting Reviews

    Using a Professional Book Reader instead of Hiring an Editor

    Deciding upon a production & promotion budget

    Newsletters and Audience Management

    Selling ebook files directly to readers (i.e., the DRM-free option)

    Pricing Psychology

    Advertising and Promotion

    Advertising on Facebook and Amazon

    Promotional Value (and Challenge) of Making Ebooks Free

    Blurbs and Making the Amazon Book Page Look Pretty

    Should you submit your short fiction to magazines?

    Reference: Legal Stuff

    Tips for Young Student Authors

    Reference: Book Description Character Limits (for sites, ads)

    Reference: How to Get Amazon to pricematch your ebook to free

    Tips I have Given on Social Media & Reddit (reposted)

    Marketing Guides and websites which were actually useful to me

    Publishing How to Books I recommend

    General Observations

    Every author and book is different. What works for one kind of book doesn’t work for another, so advice from one person may be utterly irrelevant to your project. Also, some advice may be applicable to one genre but not the other. Advice about standalone books may not apply to books in a series and vice versa. Except for coffee table books, cookbooks, children’s books, science textbooks and maybe some other specialty books, ebooks are where it’s at. Unless you are buying your own print copies and selling them yourself at live events, the profit for indies is primarily in ebooks.

    Don’t treat advice from successful authors or publishing gurus as sacrosanct. When I was in grad school, my teachers (well-known authors) gave great publishing advice — or so I thought. But I ended up not publishing anything for the next 10 years, so their advice — even if helpful when given, was irrelevant by the time I started publishing. At that time — the late 80s, the big obstacle was finding agents — and developing a long list of publication credits to help convince an agent to sign you. Looking back, that seems absolutely irrelevant to my career — even for someone like me who specialized in short stories.

    Bigger publishers are publishing a much slimmer percentage of titles with every year. You can’t rely on them to get a publishing contract. Even if you do, the wait time is significant and the advance is unlikely to be big if at all. Publishers have been blind to many high quality books –opting instead for books by celebrities and books which neatly fit into a genre. The last decade has led to many different hybrid publishing types (described in Jane Friedman’s chart about indie publishing).

    Focusing all your efforts on Amazon is dangerous. It’s good to sell at least in one place which is DRM-free. (Draft 2 Digital or payhip). I talk about this in more detail in the section below titled Selling Ebook Files Directly to Readers.

    I personally don’t like reading or writing serials, but be prepared for books to be rolled up into and sold as bundles later on.

    A lot of market tendencies for nonfiction don’t apply for fiction and vice versa. Only you can decide what’s best. I would especially be wary of authors in nonfiction — the marketing techniques and success stories they talk about are usually not relevant to your books.

    Don’t fixate on the opinions of what beta readers and friends think. Some people obsess about pleasing everyone with their book. Don’t water your book down just to make Sam or Sally happy.

    You are pushed to publish often — which even good writers can’t do reliably or well. I can probably write a book in 2 years, but that took a lot of practice and that’s even hard for me. Only you can decide what is a reasonable pace for writing books given your individual life circumstances.

    Perhaps this is obvious, but other writers don’t judge you by your sales record; they judge you by steady output and your mastery of the fundamentals. Frankly, every writer starts out clueless about promotion, and eventually the basics of marketing will come naturally. Spending too much of your focus on marketing is a certain recipe for psyching yourself out and diverting attention from the muse’s calling.

    Finally, and I hate to say that, but 99.9% of the world’s population does not care about books and specifically your book. Don’t let that get you down.

    Writing Habits and Goals

    Publishing frequently helps a lot. You should be publishing every 2 years, so arrange your book projects so that they meet that pace.

    Deadlines and Productivity. In the software industry, the question about when something will be ready always has the same answer: it’s done when it needs to be. At some point, project managers need to cut off work on new features and just make the existing features work great. Inevitably compromises have to be made. With books and creative writing, no deadline is set in stone and no compromises need to be made. It’s done whenever you decide it is. Setting writing goals (300 words a day, 2 chapters a month, 1 novel per year) is a pretty thing to do for motivation, but ultimately the goal should not be how many books or pages you have cranked out, but whether you have produced something which is the best you can possibly do.

    Ebook Formatting and Quality Control

    If you have the technical competence, it’s better to make an epub file yourself rather than use one of the distributors’ tools (like Kindle Create). That allows you to submit the same file to multiple distributors. If you don’t, you end up using a company’s specific tools and then have problems using them at a different ebook distributor. Amazon, Draft 2 Digital and Apple have great author creation tools, but they produce ebooks optimized for their own readers). In any case, it’s necessary to keep your text in a source file (.DOCX or .ODT or .IND) and then update your source file before using the company’s creation tools. Feb 2022 Update: Draft2Digital is becoming a major player in ebook distribution and now offers good tools for converting from MS Word to epub. If you use D2D’s templates, it can output semi-decent print books as well as semi-decent ebooks. D2D is also letting you input backmatter and front matter which it will roll into ebooks (and let you update those things rather than having to make another epub file from scratch).

    Before you sell at online bookstores, at minimum you need to verify that an ebook renders passably on Kindle e-ink (Paperwhite), an ios/android tablet, a 2 year old iPhone and Google Play (both inside Chrome browser and the Google Play Books mobile application). Now apparently the Kindle Previewer gives a highly accurate view of how ebooks render on mobile, e-ink and tablet devices (even more accurate than emailing the ebook to your Kindle device). I frequently see discrepancies between how things render on Kindle Previewer and the emailed epub.

    Amazon has an ebook formatting guide (PDF), but it’s often out of date, and even the formatting guide on their website contains out-of-date information. Info about CSS support and image rendering is out of date. Sometimes certain CSS works but is not officially supported. Maybe you can find help on the KDP forums, but Kindle Previewer is now good enough that you can tell how things render across devices.

    Ebook Covers — Value and Technical Requirements

    Whenever authors ask online for feedback about why their ebook isn’t selling, the overwhelming answer from others is “Your cover sucks. You need to hire a professional.” A cover certainly helps with branding and catching attention, but it’s not that important. In the ebook world, a book description, good reviews and author website are much more important than having a topnotch cover. Sure, a good cover can pay for itself (and isn’t that expensive compared to hiring an editor), but 99.9 percent of the time, “Your cover sucks” is a wrong-headed diagnosis of why the book hasn’t sold. Unlike the prose itself, an ebook cover doesn’t need to be awesome; it often needs only to be adequate and functional. Maybe a cover was more important in the days of print books; now it’s just a small and pleasant-looking graphic which appears in search results. (Recently I have been keeping a web page gallery of my fave book covers — so far it has about 200 titles). Update: I ended up paying a pretty penny for an ebook cover for one of my press’s fiction titles. I was very happy with the result; the book was hard to define, and this professionally done cover captured the spirit of it while also looking beautiful to the eyes! But I still think that a bad cover doesn’t damn a book, and a great cover doesn’t ensure the book’s success.

    Unfortunately Amazon gives lower royalties for ebooks with a lot of graphics. This is unfortunate, because graphics can make an ebook look nicer. If you want to use a graphics-intense ebook, you should still publish on Amazon, but use at least one other distribution service which doesn’t charge a fee for large ebook files. For Amazon, larger books also require a higher minimum price. If you keep the epub under 10MB, minimum price must be 1.99. If it’s over 10MB, minimum price must be 2.99. There is no delivery fee if you simply choose the 35% royalty option on Amazon

    The good news is that some other distributors like Google Play Books don’t charge delivery fees. Also, if you sell the files directly to consumers (via Payhip or something similar), you don’t have to worry about delivery fees.

    11/2024 Update: I have several ebooks which are in the 8-15 MB range. Although there is no getting around the delivery fees or lower earnings, here’s a strategy for shaving off 1 or 2 megabytes off the ebook cover so that you can price the ebook below 2.99. In its cover image guidelines, Amazon lets you upload 2 different files — one for Marketing Cover Image and another for Internal Content Image (which is part of the zipped epub file). The Marketing Cover Image can be a super-big file, but apparently there’s a lot more flexibility in what the size of the Internal Content Image can be. The main requirements of the internal content image is 1)that it not be compressed (i.e., a jpg where quality is set to 95/90/80 whatever) and 2)the internal cover takes up at least 50% of the allocated space. I’m still experimenting to figure out what 2) means. After some experimentation, I made my cover 1063 pixels width by 1700 pixels height (96dpi, 24 bit depth) which was 1.69MB. Everything still looks great in all readers and tablets.The marketing cover was 1600 pixels width and 2500 pixels height which was 3.76MB.

    Promotional Strategies — Branding, Targeting, Audience Building

    Along with the previous suggestion, it’s important to build the author brand rather than the book brand. You need to have some kind of regular public presence (via social media, blogs, podcasts). You shouldn’t have to post regularly on these places unless you have a burning desire to. Many writers do fine without posting on the Internet or do so rarely. I like the idea of contributing occasionally to a group blog or something similar. Another author regularly contributes to Quora which increases the number of times that strangers can learn who he is. Maybe one shouldn’t start writing for Quora purely to publicize the author brand, but if it’s something you were doing anyway, it might bring payoffs for the author brand.

    Some kinds of books are unlikely to make money no matter what. It’s important to maintain a diverse portfolio of book projects, mixing ones with more commercial potential with less potential.

    I generally think you get the biggest bang for your buck from efforts that permanently improve your visibility or brand. On the other hand, advertising only works for a finite period of time, and then you have to pay again. That’s why I think things like author websites, videos, podcasts, author photos and sponsored reviews are better investments than paying for ads which only last for a day or small number of days.

    It helps if you are living in a big city or can go to conferences/festivals. It also helps to appear on podcasts and youtube interviews.

    Getting Reviews

    You should pay for one review in the trades (Kirkus, Publishers Weekly, Library Journal, etc) especially for your first book. (cost — 300-500$).Some of the low cost review services are worth doing (at least initially) because you can repost them on your book page on various ebook stores. Midwest Book Review, City Book Review, US Review of Books, (and possibly Reedsy Discovery which I’ve heard good things about): these cost about $50-200. Keep in mind that Citybook or Midwest might do a blurb review even if you don’t pay for a review. Citybook Review says that they do reviews of 40% of books received regardless if it’s paid for. Booklife (aka Publishers Weekly for Indies) claims to review ebooks for free, but I’m skeptical). (Nov 2021 Update: I am less impressed by City Book Review — especially for the price). June 2022 Update: Self-Publishing Review does respectable sponsored reviews in the 160-240$ price range and Independent Review of Books charges $250.

    Set pub date 3-4 months after it is 100% finished and use the intervening time to find reviewers/beta reviewers. (Actually, 6 months in advance is fine too).

    Personally I wouldn’t bother trying to contact major publications or book critics about reviews. Too little likelihood of success. Bloggers are more amenable, but I wouldn’t spend much time trying to research them — unless you already know about them. It’s a big time-suck with little payoff. (If you are going that route, you should check out this book . ) I would probably spend the time contacting your local press, but don’t expect miracles.

    There are a few websites and services which allow you to do giveaways of ebooks in the hopes that winners will eventually post a review. I recommend the free service Librarything Member giveaways which are easy to do. (March 2022 Update: Librarything totally revamped their giveaway service to make it more friendly to small presses. Definitely check it out. The older version didn’t result in many reviews, but the new version seems to reward those who post reviews).

    Netgalley and Booksirens. These are services that you pay to list your advance review copy (ARC) in the hopes that some of them will write reviews. The cost of Netgalley used to put it out of reach for most indie authors, but in the last decade co-ops have formed to share the costs. I used Victory Editing Co-op ($65 per month), making it affordable. Here are my thoughts after listing an ebook for two days:

    1. Publishers can see a reviewer’s history and stats to make a decision about whether to approve the ARC. This is helpful, but it makes it easy for publishers just to approve the ARC to those who give gushing praise for every book they read.
    2. Frequent reviewers know how to play the game. So they write fast glib and mostly positive reviews in order to keep their feedback score high enough to garner future ARCs.
    3. Netgalley is helpful for identifying individuals associated with libraries and schools.

    Booksirens is both similar and different. Booksirens lets you pay by the download. It also gives you great access to reviewers. Theoretically speaking, you can browse through the reviewer list and send emails to these people without ever paying a dime for it. I never understood why Booksirens let you do that — with Booksirens link — for free. Only after I tried it myself did I realize that browsing through their reviewer list is a major time-suck with little payoffs. I recently spent a few hours browsing through the list of potential reviewers for a particular title and found it nearly impossible to find even one person who might be remotely interested in the title in question.

    About these review services, I have heard that some of the reviews can be overly negative. A publisher can screen these reviewers to some extent, but I’m not sure that doing so a good idea or even helpful.

    I’m recommend Bookroar, a book review swap service which opened in July 2021. You list your books and then agree to buy and review a book by another indie author. After you post a review of the book you chose, you will receive a credit which allows you to post your book for reviewing by someone else. Amazon generally prohibits reciprocal reviews, but Bookroar ensures that you never review a book by a person who has reviewed your book. It’s a very good service especially if your book is accessible and not too long or strenuous or reading. In fact, I’d even recommend that you pay $10 or $25 to be a paid member, so you get 1 or 3 extra credits a month. So far all the reviews from Bookroar have been high quality. Even the somewhat negative review was so well-written that I think it still helped the book. That’s enough to make me think that the whole concept has great potential — and the only price you pay is the time to review another stranger’s book. I’m somewhat less impressed at the low quality of the other BookRoar ebooks; finding a title to read and review can be a real chore. Bookroar sets a limit of 3 weeks to review a book, with the option for reviewers to request a 3 week extension. (FYI, I requested an extension for every single book I reviewed!) This is the main complaint I have about the service. Expecting reviewers to write a decent review of a substantially-sized book within 3 weeks is slightly insane. But overall, the people reviewing your title on Bookroar are competent and sympathetic readers.

    Getting Organic Reviews: The Paradox. Organic reviews (that is, reviews posted voluntarily and not through a review service) tend to be the most interesting and useful and positive. But how do you get organic reviews? By increasing sales! But can you increase sales if a ebook has no reviews? I’ve found out the hard way that no matter how good the book description and content and price may be, you still need reviews of some kind to make advertising work optimally.

    Don’t count on friends and family to review your title, much less read it. Most of them won’t bother to read the first page (unless the subject is salacious or they think it’s about them).

    Using a Professional Book Reader instead of Hiring an Editor

    Some common advice given to new writers is that they need to hire an editor. What they don’t tell you is how expensive that can be. You can be talking about over $1000 for something that is not guaranteed to result in more sales.

    For some people who are starting out or recognize that their writing style is flabby, paying 1000-2000 can be a worthwhile investment for a full editing job. But you shouldn’t have to do it every time. Few writers can afford to spend that much for each book they write.

    Here’s an alternative idea: Instead of hiring a developmental editor (which can be pricey), I’ve been recommending that people hire someone to be a “beta reader.” They can be a friend, but it’s better that you not know the person too well — it might affect their objectivity. The beta reader will read the book and then provide one or two pages of notes — reactions and responses. The beta reader won’t correct for style or suggest ways to rewrite paragraphs. Instead this reader will just give touchy-feely responses and mention parts he did not understand. Paying 200-300$ or so seems reasonable for this kind of feedback without putting too much of a burden on the editor (or your pocketbook). Keep in mind that this is only one reader. Another beta reader may notice totally different things. Here is the kind of beta reader feedback which really helps:

    • This part can be skipped without ruining the story.
    • I didn’t understand Person X’s motivation here or what he/she meant when he said Y.
    • I lost track of who was saying what during the conversation.
    • This person’s name (or another proper name) is used inconsistently.
    • This part dragged.
    • This scene or chapter didn’t seem necessary or relevant to the main story.
    • Is there a sentence or paragraph missing here? This word seemed wrong or misplaced.
    • It would be better to spell out earlier that A is B (I didn’t realize it the first time I read it).
    • I wanted to know more about Person G and why he/she would act this way.
    • (Occasionally) Wouldn’t it be nice if J happened or if K did this? (Authors rarely follow suggestions about plot or character, but once in a while such a suggestion hits its mark).
    • This part was too predictable. Or this part was a big surprise. (In response, the author should always ask: Was it good or bad that it was predictable or surprising? Why was it good/bad?)

    August 2025. After reading Dale Roberts’ rundown of Manuscript Analysis (which he admitted was a “sponsored post”), I can see the utility of these tools for some authors (especially if you can use it for less than a one-time cost of $25 or so).

    Deciding upon a production & promotion budget

    Professional advice-givers often recommend that indie authors spend money on X, Y and Z. (Fill in the blanks as necessary: a decent editor, a cover design artist, a video book trailer, 1 or more paid reviews, a professionally done author website, a booth at a literary conference, an author photo by a professional photographer, Facebook advertising, Amazon marketing service, a book promoter, ads in newsletters). But you could spend yourself to bankruptcy on these ancillary services without getting any real payoff. If you believe that one area is especially holding back your book’s success, fine, spend money on it while recognizing that it may not improve earnings. Book advertising is notoriously unreliable; it’s trial and error. Spend a little money, watch for results, make necessary adjustments and repeat. The most common criteria for evaluating an ancillary service is: will this extra expense of X dollars produce more than X dollars of earnings? Actually, you don’t have to break even at the beginning. Spending money on author branding (like a good author photo) are steep one-time investments, but after they’re done, they can have long-term promotional value.

    The most common “easy advice” given to authors is that they should hire a decent editor and hire a professional to do the cover. What they don’t tell you is that hiring an editor is very expensive ($500 to $1500 for someone experienced, possibly higher). Every writer should aspire to the point where they could edit their own copy as an expert — perhaps asking someone to read through just for typos and obvious discrepancies. Paying handsomely for an outside editor won’t necessarily make a book better or more saleable. It just will make it seem less bad to paying customers. Sure, you need to have a quality control process for your writing. But that doesn’t require paying someone. Remember: with ebooks, there’s always the option to make corrections later and upload a revised version of the book.

    You’re going to waste a percent of your ad budget on things which accomplish nothing. Generally book marketing always starts out as an exercise in futility — until suddenly it isn’t.

    Submitting to literary contests. Here’s a detailed chart comparing fiction contests. Here’s a more recent list of literary contests, with fees. I’m of mixed feelings about submitting pieces to literary contests. Here’s some duotrope data (2021) about submission fees and chance of success. To summarize: Average fee paid for literary contests is $19, with 2% chance of receiving an award. Average submission fee paid for genre contests is $17, with 9% chance of receiving an award.

    Newsletters and Audience Management

    The big trend these days is author newsletters. I haven’t been a fan of them until recently. They can be a big time suck, so be careful. They work by advertising a freebie (or “reader magnet”) if the person would sign up for the newsletter. The easiest way to get started is to sign up for Mailer Lite (free) and put your freebies up at Book Funnel. (20$/year). 2025 Update. Substack and Ghost are other good options for posting things to be delivered to people’s mailboxes. The main problem is becoming too dependent on the platform and being able to export your posts outside of their respective platforms. Also wordpress.com has free tools that let people receive emails every time you make a new post.

    Author newsletters can’t perform miracles, but it’s easy to advertise a free book somewhere and then to keep these people interested over the long run. If they sign up, then you essentially don’t need to pay to reach these people anymore; just shoot an email. In contrast, advertising on Amazon/Facebook or the ebook deal newsletters can be expensive and time-consuming. You need an easy way to keep in touch with “interested readers”. That means of course that you need to have several books available for sale for ebook newsletters to work.

    A new service, StoryOrigin offers authors the ability to do newsletter swaps — which makes a lot of sense. But you can do informal author swaps — ads on one another’s blog or newsletters. The real trick is finding like-minded authors you want to swap with. Some authors occupy very narrow niches.

    Although it’s not necessary to set up an elaborate website to promote the books you’ve wrote, it’s necessary to have something — some kind of home base with a list of your books — and a link to ebook stores and possibly reviews. I’m a big fan of 3 minute Youtube vids consisting of nothing but the author looking at the camera and answering some basic questions about the book — the elevator pitch, why you wrote it and what’s interesting about it.

    For newsletters to be effective, you need to have some content you can use as reader magnets. Despite the fact that you make no money from these giveaways, they could potentially lead to more sales. For that reason alone, they need to be just as high quality as the stuff you sell.

    November 2024 Update. It was a bear to set up correctly, but I’m generally gungho about MailerLite to manage email list.

    August 2025 Update. I regretfully announce that Substack (and maybe Ghost) have become default choices for blogging because it allows posts to be sent as newsletters. I have avoided Substack because it’s a wholly commercial publishing system and has ridiculous pricing for “full memberships.” But a lot of people have been using them for their free content and then using the email capability to give people updates. (WordPress.com also has this capability). From a content perspective, I don’t like it because the author cannot choose which items are sent via newsletter, but I have to admit that it helps push messages to consumers (Personally I subscribe to 40+ Substacks, and I read most of them). Frankly, I am tempted to start a substack with some of my content just to allow people to receive updates. For new authors, this is probably a good option.

    Selling ebook files directly to readers (i.e., the DRM-free option)

    Probably the most common ebook question I see on forums is: where can I sell my pdfs?

    Ever since Amazon decided not to sell PDFs to consumers, authors have wanted a way to sell PDF’s instead of EPUB or MOBI. It’s easy to convert DOCX or ODT files to PDF, with one big caveat. It mainly is optimized for one display size. (You can use Adobe to create a “reflowable PDF” but it’s way more trouble than it’s worth).

    Because it’s so hard to do well and because Amazon doesn’t sell PDFs, publishers are using PDFs mainly for advanced reader copies (with the bigger publishers encrypting the PDF using Adobe). Still this does not answer the question: how to sell digital files directly to consumers?

    First, it’s important for you to accept these things:

    • theoretically people could share the file inappropriately with others. It could end up appearing on sharing/piracy networks. (I’m fine with that because it doesn’t threaten my livelihood at all).
    • At least 50% of readers lack the technical proficiency to transfer a PDF/EPUB/MOBI file to a reading device.
    • Even if people had that technical proficiency, they still prefer purchasing from a bookstore which has a cloud-based ebook reader (like Amazon, Google, BN, Kobo).
    • Many of the tools for marketing to readers are geared to Amazon and they don’t allow linking to DRM-free ecommerce stores (which is really irritating). You have to find a way to inform readers about this option, so the value of selling files directly depends on establishing a direct way to communicate with audiences.
    • These services are ideal for reader magnets, newsletter promotions, prizes and review copies. All you have to do is provide a URL and a coupon code!

    Here is a list of DRM-free bookstores. As I see it, you have 3 main options: Gumroad, Payhip and Smashwords/Draft2Digital. While I started my e-commerce store for Personville Press with Payhip in 2021, I was excited at the easy setup and promising royalty rates. Over time I have come to recognize that most consumers are unwilling to buy ebooks from websites they don’t recognize. Smashwords is probably the most prominent seller of DRM-free ebooks, but very few buyers buy directly from Smashwords these days. As of May 2025, I would break down my earnings as: 85% from Amazon, 8% from Google Play Books, 7% from Draft2Digital (3% from Apple and 4% from Smashwords). Payhip has registered zero sales for 4 years straight. What’s astonishing about this breakdown is that Amazon pays substantially lower royalties for sub-2.99 ebooks (which is the price-range I sell my ebooks at). If I could sell these ebooks on Amazon at 2.99 or if a larger percentage of these sales came on non-Amazon sites, I would earn a LOT more.

    • Google Play Books. From GPB sales you make 0.70 cent earnings across the board (no matter the price). That means: 0.69 cents (on $0.99 price), 1.05 cents (on 1.50 price), 1.39 earnings (on 1.99 price), 1.58 earnings (on 2.25 price),1.75 earnings (on 2.50 price), 2.10 earnings (on 3.00 price).
    • Draft 2 Digital (Dec 2025 Update). 60% for sales from Apple, BN, Kobo, etc. From direct DRM-free sales from the Smashwords store, you make 40% earnings for under $2.99 and 75% earnings for prices over 2.99. That means: 0.39 cents(on 99 cent price item), 0.60 cents (on 1.50 price), 0.79 earnings (on 1.99 price), 0.90 earnings (on 2.25 price),1.00 earnings (on 2.50 price), 2.25 earnings (on 3.00 price). It really is crazy how bad SW earnings are vs. other D2D channels. Draft2Digital is probably the best you can do when trying to sell no-DRMs directly to consumers.
    • Amazon. From direct sales at Amazon you make 0.35 cent earnings (on 99 cent price item), 0.52 cents (on 1.50 price), 0.70 earnings (on 1.99 price), 0.78 earnings (on 2.25 price), 0.87 earnings (on 2.50 price), 2.10 earnings (on 3.00 price). (You may also need to pay a delivery fee depending on file size).
    • Payhip: 0 monthly charge, 5% transaction fee + Paypal/stripe — usually 2.9% + 30 cents). Ability to generate coupons, freebies, interface with mailing lists, Name-Your-Price option, PDF stamping (if you are selling PDF), 5 gig total storage maximum, ideal for audiobook files (upload as zip files) 0.61 cent earnings (on 99 cent price item), 1.08 cents (on 1.50 price), 1.54 earnings (on 1.99 price), 1.77 earnings (on 2.25 price), 2.00 earnings (on 2.50 price), 2.46 earnings (on 3.00 price). Note: Despite the ease of use and high percentages, almost no one has bought anything from there, so I am not recommending it anymore.

    Amazon’s agreement with authors allow it to price match the lowest available price on the Internet. I don’t think payhip is on anyone’s radar right now, but Amazon certainly auto-detects that ebooks are free or lower price on BN, Google, Kobo. You can get around this on Smashwords by creating a “public coupon” which is a discounted price only found on the Smashwords/Draft 2 Digital site and nowhere else. My rule of thumb is to price titles on Payhip and on the Smashwords channel of D2D at 50% of its Amazon price because (for titles costing less than 2.99), the revenues are only 35%. Even with that lower prices, sales on Payhip and Smashwords are still puny compared to Amazon.

    Pricing Psychology

    It’s common to price your ebook at 0 or 1 dollar at the beginning and to raise prices gradually over time as you accumulate reviews.

    One good feature that most distributors seem to have adopted is temporary or time-limited discounts. That allows you to create a temporary price which will revert back to the normal price after an amount of time you specify. Definitely take advantage of that; saves you valuable time.

    Setting your ebook price at free has some value, but the consensus is that it doesn’t increase earnings much unless you also have 4 or 5 other titles which cost money. It’s also smart to make the first volume in a series free or 99 cents. Also, it’s okay to offer a freebie in exchange for an email signup. But ultimately you won’t win many readers solely by offering freebies. (Note: See below for important update about the effectiveness of offering freebies).

    Most of the problems with advertising come from Amazon’s low royalties on ebooks priced below 2.99.

    It’s practically impossible to compete on price these days for ebooks. The major publishers are using a high sticker price (i.e. over $10) and then doing spot sales to put the ebook under $3. The amount of quality titles you can buy between the 1.99 and 3.99 on a daily basis is jaw-droppingly high. 2024 Update. Amazon has allowed the Big 5 to discount their backlist titles to 50 cents or 75 cents, making it all the more futile to compete on price.

    Amazon’s 2.99 price floor allows you to have 70% profits. Amazon allows you to price between 99 cents and 2.99 but at 35% profits. But if you promote your stuff below 2.99, that means a unit profit of only $0.34-$1.04 per sale (compared to 2.10 per sale for $2.99). Suppose you do a marketing campaign and pay $100 for one title; to break even, a 2.99 ebook needs to sell 47 ebooks. To break even at the 35% profit threshold for your $100 investment, you need to sell 142 ebooks (for 1.99 cent per ebook) or 294 ebooks (for 0.99 cent ebooks).

    Much has been written about the 99 cent vs. 2.99 vs. 3.99 price strategy on Amazon. For some book buyers (like me) those extra dollars might be dealbreakers, but not for other people. What’s definitely true is:

    • purchasing a 2.99 ebook on Amazon is a LOT more profitable than purchasing a 99 cent ebook. (For most books, you’re talking about $2.07 profit for one sale vs. $0.34). For this reason it’s much much better to be able to persuade readers to buy on Amazon at 2.99 and above.
    • Ebook deal newsletters mostly are encouraging authors to advertise 99 cent specials rather than 2.99 and up novels.
    • Some ebookstores (Google, Smashwords) are offering higher earning percentages for ebooks below 2.99, but those account for a very small percent of sales volumes. You could probably persuade a small percent of readers to buy from those places, but the majority are still going to stick with Amazon. For example, I get a sliver of sales on Google Play Books, but the higher earnings means that I sometimes earn more $ from GPB than Amazon.

    Advertising and Promotion

    Several discussion boards always contain questions about advertising, and the consensus answer seems to be: don’t bother trying unless you have several books under your name. Purely from a marketing point of view, having several books to promote is easier than promoting only one — especially if discounting one title helps them to be a repeat customer.

    Book Marketing Guru David Gaughran has prepared 15 rules for advertising books, all of which are valid and useful.

    The primary way to promote ebooks at this moment seems to be ebook deal newsletters which authors and publishers pay for. Bookbub used to be the best service, but now it’s too expensive. Other services like bargainbooksy and booksends offer more competitive rates. (I highly recommend Dave Gaughran’s annotatedlist of Best Book Promo Sites which he ranks the promo sites and updates regularly.

    On Google Docs I created a spreadsheet where I calculated the “break even” point on advertising (prepare to be depressed!) Some remarks:

    • Sometimes the goal is not to break even but simply to increase distribution of titles (with the hope of snagging reviews or repeat customers). Maybe its goal is simply to raise awareness of the author in readers.
    • Ad effectiveness can vary with time. I promoted a new ebook at 1.99 with 3 sponsored reviews, but no reviews from paying customers. Earnings were low. On the other hand, if the Amazon page had more reviews from paying customers, maybe the rate of return would be different. Also, it’s conceivable that higher prices and/or better rates can improve future returns. For example, GPB and Smashwords currently pay 70-85% for ebooks under 2.99. It’s not too far-fetched to envision that Amazon will improve earnings below 2.99.

    So far, I’ve seen limited returns on these promo sites — only about a 20-50% of the cost is actually returned in earnings — producing a negative balance. The main reason is that most promo sites are geared to promoting discounted books at a price of 0 or 99 cents, and that’s a price point where authors receive only 35% of earnings; in other words, you need to sell 285 ebooks for the promotion to break even. That does not mean all is for naught. If you define success as raising brand awareness for other books or attracting reviews, then the campaign might still be deemed successful. Also, Gaughran makes the argument that promo stacking (running multiple overlapping promos for different ebooks) can have synergistic effects on brand awareness. For example, my press is coming out with a great story collection in July by Jack Matthews. It will be priced at 4-5$, but I’ll keep the other Jack Matthews titles on sale at different price points and promoting the cheap titles might increase the interest in the 4-5$ title.

    Generally it’s a losing proposition to buy advertising in general media if a significant portion of the audience are not book buyers. Although there is the potential to reach new audiences, the problem is that other products and companies will be willing to pay a higher rate for ads because the products or services being sold bring more profit per item. On the other hand, advertising on Amazon Marketing Service might have more potential payoffs because the people on the site are more likely to be book-buyers. (Not that I wholeheartedly endorse this service. It depends on the book and the price of the keywords you are buying). Update: Multiple sources have suggested that the bid which A.M.S. suggests is way too expensive for its effectiveness.

    Another issue with buying ads on Amazon is ad saturation. Author and book promoter Dave Gaughran once wrote: As I write these words, there are currently 248 different titles on the product page of the Kindle edition of “Let’s Get Digital.” Between the ads, Also Boughts, Also Vieweds, Amazon promotion, and other links, there are hundreds of things that could distract a reader before they purchase.

    The problem with “algorithmic advertising” that you see in social media is that a potential consumer is not likely to see it more than once. Also, consumers are less likely to trust a targeted ad provided by Google or Facebook. Watch your money carefully — especially at the beginning.

    If you advertise, you should start with a small fixed amount, then choose an advertising method and then track its performance. (Nowadays you can check daily ebook sales from every distributor). Generally the ad should pay for itself and then some. But you need to figure out which advertising method is actually cost-effective. You can do that by trying only one promotional campaign at a time and checking if it increases sales. It’s okay to burn a small amount of money when you’re starting out (200 dollars or less), but it’s also perfectly okay not to advertise at all (or rather do primarily no-cost techniques).

    March 2022 Update. I saw this Amazon Marketing strategy suggested on reddit. This sounds like a really effective strategy. (I plan to try it out and report back).

    My strategy is to not let Amazon cajole me into spending more than I can make.

    E.g., suppose it takes you 10 clicks to get a sale. This isn’t great, but also isn’t terrible for the slower months. This assumes your targeting is on point, your cover/blurb are working. If you’re at a $4.99 price point for the ebook, you make $3.44 on that sale. Your break even point is your royalty divided by the number of clicks you paid for: $3.44/10. If you bid any more than $0.34 on your clicks, you will not break even.

    Set your bid price according to your price point and potential royalty. Use your first 100 clicks to evaluate how many sales you’re getting per click. Hopefully it’s less than 10. If it’s more than 10, evaluate what’s going wrong between the click and sale, then try again.

    What we Need: More fundamentally, there is a real need for a book promotion service to allow optional links to Payhip or Smashwords or the author’s home page. That way, the author can direct the reader to a place with the lowest transaction fees and the most likely to result in a newsletter signup or a suggest sell to another ebook. It may take a long time for that to happen.

    Advertising on Facebook and Amazon

    I have never tried either service yet, although I will do so reasonably soon. I remain gloomy about its usefulness. Here are some general thoughts on strategies without having tried it:

    • If you’re linking to an Amazon ebook, you need to have the ebook priced at least 2.99 for it to pay off. (Lower prices mean you have to sell more copies to break even).
    • If you can advertise on book pages, aim not for 1st tier authors/books but 2nd/3rd tier.
    • Expect Facebook, etc to change their rules about promotions often.
    • The goal is for the potential reader/customer to come across the author’s name or book several times. Just hitting the reader one time won’t be sufficient.
    • You need to analyze your analytics to figure out which keywords are actually leading to sales. Then you need to remove any keyword combinations which are not leading to enough sales. Pruning your keywords is an important skill and requires some technical experience and knowledge to do right.

    Promotional Value (and Challenge) of Making Ebooks Free

    It’s unclear how effective offering freebies can be in promoting the author and the book itself. David Gaughran’s post on the the topic is probably the best resource.

    Offering freebies is good if you have many products by the same author which you want to sell. If multiple products are available, it’s good to have at least one thing for free.

    Given that ebooks are already usually cheap, a low price isn’t so much of a barrier that it prevents the customer from buying. But still it’s a lot easier for someone to decide to vote YES on a free item on a Cloud-based reader than paying a small fee for something. It’s slightly harder to vote yes on a free ebook from a DRM-free site even if it’s free because you have to download and manage the file. Maybe your established fans might do it, but that’s why I use a lower promotional price at No-DRM stores.

    Offering a freebie in exchange of a newsletter signup seems to be good for the author. Also having a BUY ONE GET ONE FREE does seem to make someone more likely to pay.

    I don’t think putting a book under creative commons is a particularly helpful promotional tool for ebooks. Why? You still need to pay or work hard to promote the ebook.

    The big unknown in author circles is whether participation in Kindle Select (ie, Kindle Unlimited) actually makes you more money in the long run over conventional sales. One clear advantage of Select is that you are allowed to price your ebook for free for 3 days (but elsewhere, you can do it every day without rules or limits).

    Advertising to make something free? As counterintuitive as it sounds, authors have to spend a lot of time and money promoting free works. Is it worth it? It offers several possible advantages: 1)possibly more reviews and word of mouth, 2)getting the author’s name out there (so people will buy other ebooks by the same author). Here’s what I found after promoting a first story collection (not enrolled in Kindle Select) as an experiment in Oct 2021:

    • $60 for 1 day ad on Freebooksy brought 828 Amazon downloads +36 apple (864 total) ( I paid 6.9 cents for each person to download)
    • $30 + $5 top listing for free ebook on Ereaderiq brought 671 Amazon downloads + 9 apple (680 total) (I paid 5.1 cents for each person to download).

    I did another freebie release in Feb 2022 for a very high quality title. I paid 3.5 cents per download for Freebooksy and 5 cents per download for Ereaderiq. In July 2022, I repeated the same marketing campaign for the same ebook I marketed in Oct 2021. I paid pretty much the same rate and got 700 combined downloads from Freebooksy and 200 from Ereaderiq.

    I still haven’t received any additional reviews from the Oct 21 freebie promotion. So while I don’t regret running these ad campaigns, there has been absolutely no payoff. (The ebook promoted here is for a single non-series story collection which is the only title by that author, so it’s a hard sell anyway).

    In 2025, $20 for a 1 day listing on a niche/genre service resulted in 125 Amazon downloads + 12 Google + 5 Apple (142 total). (I paid 14 cents for each person to download).

    I looked at Bookbub’s stats on Free downloads. Looking at two categories, I see that for a free download, you pay about $500 and get about 10,000-20,000 downloads. Even if you assume that the stats are rosier than reality, you’re talking about 2-5 cents for each person to download. Of course, the trick is convincing Bookbub to accept your ebook (which means getting a certain number of reviews and ratings), which is a challenge indeed.

    My current outlook on ads in ebook deal newsletters is

    1. do at least one freebie promotion during an ebook’s first year.
    2. don’t use the promoter for the same ebook more than 3 times. Sales dropped considerably after the second and even first, suggesting the audience for these newsletters is small and dedicated – they probably even saw it listed the first time.
    3. People who get freebies don’t necessarily convert to buy one of the paid copies by the same author (sad, but true). Maybe later they will, who knows.
    4. The goals of freebies is 1)to improve Amazing ratings (how many stars) and 2) to raise awareness about the author. Even ebooks which are never reviewed can be rated under the Star system (and I think that is pulled from Goodreads). August 2025 Update. Unfortunately some of the newsletters block you from advertising your ebook until your ebook have received ratings from Amazon. (Thankfully, freebooksy doesn’t do that). That may be reason to do freebies until you get enough ratings. On the other hand, paying for someone to download freebies in the hopes of receiving reviews seems like an expensive and ineffective strategy.
    5. After year 1, start advertising on deal newsletters at a budget price, but infrequently — once maybe twice a year.

    Blurbs and Making the Amazon Book Page Look Pretty

    One way that established publishers beat the pants off indie authors and publishers is amassing an impressive number of blurbs about a book which are prominently featured on the book landing page on Amazon and elsewhere. (I have pejoratively called it the “manufactured wall of praise.”) Some come from published reviews, while others may come from famous and not-so-famous authors. I suspect that some of these blurbs were written by authors from the same publishing house or friends or teachers of the author. Gosh, we readers are so easily swayed by social proof. For that reason, I once believed that blurbs weren’t particularly reliable or honest.

    When I got into publishing, I began to see things differently. It is really really hard to get a book reviewed, especially a title which is long or complex or challenging. For those hard books, you can end up purchasing sponsored reviews just to get a decent review of it–and that’s no guarantee that the result will be to your liking. I’ve heard stories of books being savaged by Kirkus reviewers which people paid $400-500 for).

    In other words, publishers and authors use blurbs to save money on efforts to get a book reviewed. Sure, it’s not better than bona fide reviews or sponsored reviews. But it’s better than nothing. Also, often a well-written blurb from another author or critic can capture what is unique or interesting about a book. (A poorly written one can make it sound generic and cliched).

    Have you noticed that occasionally a blurb can be taken from a blurb for a different book? I used to think, “what nerve trying to pawn off an old blurb on another book!” You’re missing the point. Sometimes a statement about another book can provide a good clue about the current one. For example, I’ve been using this generic blurb from an older review of a Jack Matthews book for his newer books. (“Matthews stories are like friends from small towns: They are honest, warm, occasionally lyrical and as strange and idiosyncratic as the rest of us.”) Unfair? Maybe, but this blurb (which costs nothing to rerun) is just so great and generally applicable.

    Here’s one tip for rookies: Use Amazon Author Central to create an author landing page. (It’s on the Marketing Resource Manager page). That requires a separate step — and is totally different from KDP, but it lets you add an author photo, include reviews and stuff from the Author. In July 2021 Amazon allowed authors and publishers to include A+ Content (basically illustrated banners right above the customer reviews). That’s a good thing, but I doubt it will radically change sales if the other elements aren’t compelling. (I am creating an A+ banner for one book and will report back how much of a difference it made). Update: No, it didn’t.

    Update: I created a nice A+ panel for a very quirky book. But I discovered something interesting. Apparently, these panels (and the review section) must be approved for each different country store. More importantly, the Reviews section in Amazon Author central must be approved to appear in Amazon’s other bookstores (UK, Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan). You should definitely use the Amazon Author Central to request that the Review section which you created for the US store be copied over to the other stories likely to have a lot of US customers. August 2025 Update. The A+ panel has made almost zero impact on sales — even when I ran newsletter ads. My current preference is to stock the middle section with a “wall of praise” or an author’s intro — or even an annotated TOC for a story collection.

    Should you submit your short fiction to magazines?

    (See Erika Krouse’s awesome ranking of 500 Literary Magazines for Short Fiction).

    Here’s why I quit submitting to story magazines: the rewards (monetary and nonmonetary) never were significant enough to justify the effort. Also, the submission/acceptance process was too slow. I would spend months waiting for an answer that wasn’t an acceptance. The delays imposed by waiting for publication seemed silly given that I could self-publish a story collection fairly quickly.

    Here are some screengrabs of submission statistics (Aug 2021) for nonfiction and fiction to journals and litmags. It ain’t pretty.

    During the 1990s I followed litmags and submitted to them with marginal (and mostly disappointing) returns. It’s true that there are some paying markets, but not so many in literary fiction — many of which are being run by graduate English departments (which publish at a glacial pace). Another thing. Getting in print increasingly seemed irrelevant given that Internet and blogging has the potential to spread word of your ebook more quickly and cheaply.

    It kind of reminds me of the question of whether high school basketball stars should try out for the pros or play college basketball. Conventional wisdom says, play college basketball first, then go pro. But if you are good enough and if your athletic career only lasts for a few years anyway, why waste 4 of them in college? (It’s not like you can’t go later). Succeeding on the fiction magazine circuit seems to be more of an exercise than an actual milestone. In the past, publishing in magazines was helpful in convincing agents to represent you or publishers to publish you. But if it is no longer a problem to get published or self-publish, why bother?

    I’ve always liked litmags — they have always been vital for poetry, but the prices for most of them are high — and frankly I’d be lucky if friends and family ever picked up the New Yorker once in a while. You’re never going to get many adults — even adult readers — to keep up with Paris Review or Narrative Magazine — especially because even I personally don’t follow them anymore.

    Also, I’m not particularly convinced that getting published in these mags lead to more book sales. Readership at these places remains pretty limited (though I was pleasantly surprised recently to learn about Narrative Magazine — which seems to be doing a lot of things right).

    It’s also important to compare the cost of magazine subscriptions vs. the cost of ebooks. You can always find great discounted story collections through ebook deal newsletters and blogs and price alert services like ereaderiq. Heck, you can also sample the first chapters on the Kindle! I buy tons of discounted story collections by indie/unknown authors for less than $5 (and I even write a monthly column on what I find).

    The important question becomes: if the pay rate for stories is nominal in litmags and if litmags have very limited audiences, what value does getting published there have in establishing or helping a literary career? (aside from impressing English department heads and application committees). I’d much rather receive a positive review of a story collection ebook than have one of my stories accepted from one of the so-called prestige journals. Maybe instead of submitting to these places, I should just pay for an ad instead. There’s far less waiting involved.

    The process/time thing was the thing that most bothered me about story submissions, and I’m glad to see that services like duotrope have made it much more efficient. If I were starting out, I’d probably try harder to submit stories using this intermediary, but it does not make sense for someone my age to do so. On the other hand, I am more interested in getting published in anthologies (which are essentially special issue magazines). Duotrope is great for identifying anthologies looking for submissions.

    I could hardly call myself a commercially successful author (although I am proud of the things I have written and self-published). And I understand that some writers have benefitted from being published in story mags (especially in certain genres). On the other hand, over the decades, I have gotten the sense that most of what gets published in the New Yorker (to name a high profile mag) came in not over the transom but directly from whatever is in the publisher’s catalog for the next season.

    August 2025 Update. I still agree with what I said here, but I overlooked the importance of this publication list for impressing university department heads when applying for a job. Also, (I’m guessing) it probably impresses Big 5 editors trying to decide whether to buy a book. Perhaps the thinking of a Big 5 editor goes like this: 1) this person understands how the academic hiring system works and has already done the legwork and so 2)this person is more likely to have a full time job at a university and also a regional base of support (for doing publicity and readings) and experience doing readings and presentations; so 3)this author is more likely to have a long and varied writing career and is more likely to have financial and social support to enable a lifetime of writerly productivity. In contrast, why should I get invested in an unknown weekender author without a teaching job who probably will never find a way to sustain his writing pursuits?

    Pay careful attention to legal stuff. Buy Writer’s Legal GPS by Matt Knight (highly recommended!) to answer basic questions about contracts, copyright and fair use. (His blog is very useful too). On the other hand, I’ve noticed that authors are way too paranoid about writing/borrowing/quoting/parodying when the risk of exposure is minimal. The answer to everything is not always “Hire an attorney” or “Never do it.” Instead it’s “be aware of the potential legal ramifications” and “decide if the legal risks are high enough that you need to solicit outside advice or avoid it altogether.”

    With collaborators, it’s important to make allies, not enemies. Therefore, legal clarity is vitally important. You want to make sure that collaborators are comfortable working with you and that you are not overstepping your bounds. It’s much easier to discuss and agree on touchy matters beforehand so that collaborators don’t feel taken advantage of later.

    If there are good-faith misunderstandings between collaborators, I would bend over backwards to resolve them and even agree to split the difference about earnings/costs, etc. Get these disagreements behind you ASAP.

    It helps to become aware of legal aid organizations specifically to help artists. In Texas there is TALA (Texas Accountants and Lawyers for the Arts) , and probably other states have something comparable.

    Here’s a legal tip. CMSI created a set of best legal practices in fair use for poetry. It describes how you can legally use poems as epigraphs for stories or book chapters.

    If you are signing a contract with a publishing company, I would be careful about signing multiple book contracts. Also, I would pay special attention to how contracts can be terminated and what steps are necessary to transfer copyright control.

    Tips I have Given on Social Media & Reddit (reposted)

    In answer to a twitter question about inside publishing wisdom, I made 4 tweets:

    • For every talented acclaimed author, there are 100+ exciting indie ones flying under radar & making almost no money. It’s incredibly $$ & risky to promote unknowns — unless you have a)blurbs by famous people b)paid reviews and c) movie deal — or if the author is young & telegenic.
    • Indie author obstacles: Paltry book coverage in Mainstream Media (except cookbooks, true crime & celebrity memoirs). Even highbrow media follows the herd. Memoirs by unknowns are especially hard sell b/c you’re still competing against Holocaust, crime victims & celebs w/ drug problems.
    • Amazon’s dominance of book industry is overwhelming. All parties really are subject to vagaries of Amzon policy & business strategy and utterly dependent on its marketing tools. Every author loves/hates Amazon!
    • Only way to overcome these obstacles is publish often, stick with conventional genres and/or have a trust fund (and/or grant money/academic position) to bankroll your noncommercial projects. Of course, to qualify for a grant or position, you have to win a prize/receive some acclaim beforehand. It’s a vicious circle.

    Thread: Dark Side of Self-Publishing? (April 2025)

    1. Friends and family have almost zero interest in mentioning your book on social media.
    2. Direct solicitation of potential reviewers is a major time suck with little reward.
    3. It’s easy to drop a lot of money in advertising and promotion and accomplish absolutely nothing. On the other hand, without doing so, the book can remain invisible to the segment of people who are your ideal readers.
    4. It really is amazing how many readers will buy only from Amazon.
    5. You discover how many great and interesting books have less than 2 reviews on Amazon/Goodreads.

    Thread: Should authors of litfiction self-publish? (May 2025)

    I feel your pain. But first, I want to differentiate literary fiction from other kinds of fiction. Literary fiction implies 1)getting signed on with a prestige press, 2)winning an award and/or 3)getting reviews in prominent places. Excelling in lit fiction helps in getting teaching jobs and qualifying for grants. So even if lit fiction is a money-losing venture for many writers, one can rationalize it by saying, “well at least it could lead to other kinds of funding or financial support.” Then it becomes a vicious circle. College teachers need to publish in obscure journals and academic presses to impress hiring/tenure committees. But these sources don’t have much visibility (and tend to be expensive for consumers). At this point these authors are chasing not commercial success but the impressive C.V.

    #2 and #3 require a considerable investment of money. Prestige presses are pretty good at figuring out how to help books win awards and get books reviewed in prominent places. Also, they will pay these fees. But how important is that really? And how much do you want to spend for those things?

    As an indie writer you can pay all those award fees in the hope of winning one of them and pay for sponsored reviews and advertising. But you’re investing a lot of your own cash. The choice then becomes: do you try for trad publishing (which has a high rate of rejection and possibly a lot of waiting) or start striking out on your own and failing quickly and often?

    I’ve always thought of trad publishers as poachers searching for quarry in the indie publishing world. Perhaps it makes more sense for indie authors to ignore the poachers until they start circling around you….

    Thread: Should authors pay for dev editors? (July 2025)

    The statement that paying for an objective set of eyes to edit a manuscript is essential for every author isn’t universally true. With the proper distance and time, an author can spot most discrepancies/errors.

    I read and review books from the Big 5 and Indie Authors. I don’t see a huge difference between the quality of fiction in both worlds.

    But when people say that every indie author must pay several thousand dollars for a professional edit to make the work presentable, I have to question that.

    I have generally recommended that new authors pay for a professional edit for their first book (and possibly second). But some authors (including myself) have gone through graduate writing programs and gained basic and even advanced editing skills. These kinds of writers generally produce clean and tight manuscripts. They have also internalized certain readerly sensibilities which they can use to analyze manuscripts. For those people, paying for another “objective set of eyes” seems like an extravagance.

    I suppose that dev editors are good at helping authors to remove flab, and that’s an important thing. That’s not just prose flabbiness, but removing scenes, etc. Maybe for longer novels, getting objective feedback about what parts seems flabby would be valuable even to experienced authors (if only from a marketing perspective). But at what cost? (And couldn’t that be solved with a beta read instead?)

    Reddit thread on what I wish I’d known. (August 2025)

    Seeking reviews and increasing exposure are two totally separate tasks.

    But book coverage in media has dwindled significantly in these outlets, and blogs don’t attract enough eyeballs (maybe they never did). So obtaining positive reviews will only do much in helping to promote a book.

    The bigger challenge is finding a way to expose the book to potential customers. That requires both time and money. It can be a challenge to devise a marketing strategy that breaks even, much less make a profit.

    Podcasting and short TikTok vids are the latest trend to promote authors and their works. But both involve time commitments and a learning curve.

    The Reader magnet strategy (get a free ebook if you sign up for a mailing list) is one way to start a relationship with customers. But that does not really solve the exposure problem.

    The difficulty in attracting organic reviews (Jan 2006)

    There are lots of factors to determine how easily the organic reviews start coming.

    Standalone books and books in a series have totally different dynamics. So do technical and nonfiction books (which may be discovered when a visitor searches by subject).

    Some types of books are relatively easy to review; some are hard. Longer, more complex works take a while to attract reviews; shorter works in a well-known genre are somewhat easier.

    Also, it can boil to budget and timing. Are you spending money to make the ebook available through review services?

    One hard lesson I learned is that for the type of ebooks I publish is that you need at least a few reviews at the start to attract sales and organic reviews. That’s a good rationale for purchasing at least one sponsored review.

    One challenge I face as a short story writer is making the collection long enough for readers to feel that they got their money’s worth at a $2.99+ price point, but not so long that it discourages organic reviews. Because royalties jump to 70% at $2.99, the goal should be to have a title which feels like a good deal for $2.99

    Marketing Guides and websites which were actually useful to me:

    One caveat is that most of these help books assume you are as prolific as Stephen King and writing in a popular genre. In Erik’s book he says that he assumes a writer is publishing 2 books a year — which is wildly out of sync with the productivity of actual writers. With literary fiction, publishing a book every 2-5 years used to be the norm (and that was only if you had some kind of cushy academic job).

    I agree that this standard was probably too easy and that writers should publish more regularly. But there’s a catch 22 embedded in these assumptions. ie.,

    1. the only way you can make a living as a writer is to publish a new book every 6 months or year BUT
    2. the only way you can write a book every 6-12 months is to quit your job and follow some write-to-market formula BUT
    3. the only way you can sell your book is to spend money on ancillary marketing services — which may or may not work depending on your book, BUT
    4. The only way you can find money to spend on marketing services is to invest your own cash — and assume the risk yourself, BUT
    5. The only way to invest your own cash is to be already making a living which lets you save money.
    6. GO to #1 .

    This definitely starts to resemble the underpants gnome business model after a while. But all is not bleak — especially if you have some supplemental income to help you with #4. Beginner’s luck could help, as well as a good circle of friends and successful author branding. The main thing I worry about is momentum: if you are not able to publish as often as Stephen King, gaining momentum can be harder (in terms of media mentions, etc). Basically all you can hope for is that readers discover your backlist of titles soon enough that you don’t go broke first.

    In the past, you would seek reviews in newspapers or TV as a way to publicize the book. More recently you would look to blogs for reviews.

    Tips for Young Student Authors

    (I prepared the next few tips for an ambitious high school author wanting to publish her first book).

    It’s good to try out a lot of things and don’t worry about success or failure. Most readers, agents and publishers are not going to want to read or publish a writer who is still in school, but there are always exceptions to that rule. The important thing is to finish the project you started and make it the best it can possibly be. Even if the book amounts to nothing, 10-20 years later you will always look with pride at how you managed to pull everything together.

    The biggest challenge a writer faces is indifference and rejection. The other big problem is that people are less interested in reading books by people who are not famous. The battle to convince people that your books are interesting takes a lot of patience and perseverance.

    The other big challenge is that writing a book is hard. It takes a lot of work and a lot of revision. It is hard making it as slim as possible and also easy to read. Just organizing plot and character is complicated and hard. It can frustrate many people (even many smart people). Often you don’t realize why your book is hard to read. It’s also hard being original, or trying an idea that doesn’t just copy what another author has tried.

    The big overwhelming question the author must ask is, “so what?!” Why is this book important? Why should someone care about your character? Why should someone read this book instead of a book by Hemingway or Tolstoy? Maybe friends or family can appreciate something you’ve written, but keep in mind that most potential readers are never going to meet you or know how interesting or unusual you are.

    Finishing or publishing a novel is a worthy summer or school project, but many writers have the sense that their writing style will improve, and so there’s no rush in publishing when your style is not yet ready. That raises a paradox. Practice makes perfect; the more you write, the easier it becomes. Also, every writing project is in a sense a practice project, so there’s no harm in perfecting it until you are completely happy with it — regardless of how old you are. (Many sci fi authors and poets get started early though).

    A writer can end up waiting forever for the right publishing opportunity. The submission/rejection process is long and frustrating. It is not unusual to self-publish your first or second book just because you’re sick and tired of waiting for opportunities.

    If you want to self-publish commercially, I recommend publishing as an ebook — either through Draft2Digital or KDP. Both are free. The main problem with KDP is that you are using proprietary tools that work on only one platform (i.e, Kindle). Ideally you want to create an ebook which is readable on several reading systems. Draft2Digital uses its own tools, but I think they produce epubs that can be submitted to any bookstore. Alternately you can use Calibre or Adobe Indesign. The main problem with printed books is that the options either require your buying 100 copies and selling it yourself — or uploading it to a print-on-demand place (like Amazon, Lulu, etc) and then being forced to sell it at too high a price.

    If you want to self-publish noncommercially, I recommend Wattpad or something similar. Many writers have developed a following of loyal readers that way even if they are giving away stories for free.

    If you want to produce something you can show your friends, consider printing it informally from Kinkos and selling for a few bucks (as a zine, etc).

    There is no shame about waiting until you finish graduating from college to start publishing; you’d still be ahead of most writers. One important reason for completing a book while still a student is so you can include it with applications for college or graduate school.

    Paying for editors to edit your fiction is always an option, but it’s too expensive for most people.

    If you are under 25, the easiest way to get feedback for your fiction is to join a writers’ group or sign up for a creative writing class (at community college or at a university). Often you can find information about local writers’ groups at your public library. Or you can start one yourself! Don’t be alarmed if people in your group are significantly older or younger than you. A variety of perspectives always provides the best feedback.

    Alternately you can join an online writers’ group; the main problem is people don’t have to be polite or civilized, so it can quickly get nasty.

    A good place for getting started is publishing to magazines. If you want to submit to magazines, submit to contests, find literary agents, I recommend signing up for duotrope $5/month or $50 per year.

    Nowadays it’s becoming common to pay a submission fee to enter a contest or submit to a magazine. This is not a scam, but you should be careful not to pay too much for this. $5 or less per submission is reasonable.

    Some good books for starting out: Stephen KingOn Writing: A Memoir of the Craft. Also Writing Tools: 55 Essential Strategies for Every Writer by Roy Peter Clark and A Worker’s Writebook by Jack Matthews (which my publishing company publishes!) I love the Roy Peter Clark book even though it’s more about nonfiction writing and journalism.

    One first step to being a good writer is finding out what’s out there. I’d recommend subscribing to a newsletter of your favorite author. Also, subscribing to an ebook deal newsletter can make you aware of good cheap ebooks out there. (Look for bookgorilla, bargainbooksy, bookbub).

    Another good step is regularly listening to podcasts by authors or about a book genre. There are tons of good ones.

    See also: writing advice for middle school students (applies to older writers as well!)

    Reference: Book Description Character Limits (for sites, ads)

    Here are some character & word limits for the various ebookstores and ebook deal newsletters (current as of 11/2020:

    • Amazon opening paragraph (what appears before you click MORE): 466-490 characters.
    • Smashwords opening paragraph: 399 characters.
    • Google Books opening Paragraph: 450 characters
    • Amazon Author Central book description: 4000 characters, 600 words

    Ad copy permitted for the ebook deal promoters:

    • Bargain Booksy: 466-490 characters
    • Bookbub 297 characters
    • Book Gorilla: Lead: 105 characters, body: 324 characters
    • Fussy Librarian: 700 characters
    • Bookspry. 200 characters.

    How to Get Amazon to pricematch your ebook to free.

    It can be a challenge to price your ebook for free on Amazon. For ebooks that are exclusively on Kindle Unlimited (i.e., Kindle Select), they are allowed 2 free days every 60 days. But if you are publishing an ebook nonexclusively, it can be tricky to get it priced to free. Before you do anything, you must make sure that there are at least two places where the ebook can be obtained for free. (It’s relatively easy to price things for free on Smashwords and Google Play Books. After you have confirmed that it is available for free at two different places, follow these steps:

    1. Start at Amazon KDP Dashboard
    2. Click on the help button at the top right hand corner.
    3. Scroll down to the contact us button on the bottom left corner.
    4. Select the pricing option, then select price match and provide the requested information, including at least two addresses where your book can be purchased for zero dollars.
    5. You should hear back from them in a couple of days and the book will be price matched within a week. You have to do this for each of the Amazon stores separately, so .com, .ca, .uk etc.

    July 2025 Update: The last time I tried it, I received a “sorry but no” reply. However, after I priced a title for free on all the ebook stores, eventually Amazon picked it up and priced it for free as well. Importantly, it did this ONLY at the Amazon USA store. I’m guessing that Amazon’s commerce tools automatically pick up prices from competitors, so it no longer seems necessary to submit a pricematch to Amazon this way.

    Publishing How to Books I recommend

    (I’m limiting myself to practical books about producing and marketing books. Information in these books go out of date very quickly. I also recommended some writing guides above.)

    How to Self-publish and Market a Children’s Book (Second Edition): June 2021. Self-publishing in print, eBooks and audiobooks, children’s book marketing, translation and foreign rights Kindle Edition by Karen P. Inglis (author website). I know next to nothing about children’s books, and so in Aug 2021 I paid 6.99 for the second edition which just came out. It’s an excellent book which covers a lot of ground. The author is from UK, and UK/Europe has a different market than USA, but most of her tips still hold true.

    The Writer’s Legal GPS: A guide for navigating the legal landscape of publishing (A Sidebar Saturdays Desktop Reference) By Matt Knight. Knight runs the Sidebar Saturdays blog about publishing and the law, and this book puts all the blog stuff into book form to make a good reference.

    Relevant Things I’ve Written about publishing

    Resources for Traditional Publishing

  • Map to the stars: The secret delights of annotated bibliographies

    Map to the stars: The secret delights of annotated bibliographies

    Silly me, I realized that I forgot to link to an annotated bibliography (AB) I made of US Civil War fiction a few years ago. I did this as an appendix to a story collection ebook by Jack Matthews I edited a few years ago. This ebook sells for $3 on Amazon and $1.50 on Smashwords. Actually though I had so much fun compiling this AB that I ended up writing a post about it on Teleread. Here is a verbatim reproduction of that same essay. Enjoy.

    Map to the stars: The secret delights of annotated bibliographies

    The older I become, the more I seem to enjoy reading about books than actually reading them. Why do people read about books?

    Books are plentiful, and our time on this earth is limited. People need some method for picking and prioritizing what they read (or in general what they do with free time). The youthful reader is inclined to read indiscriminately, favoring whatever was unavailable at libraries or forbidden by parents.

    By early adulthood it dawns on people that reading time (or time in general)  is a precious commodity. Even if you are lucky enough to find a career that requires a significant amount of reading, there never seems to be enough time to read what  you really want. If you spend too much time on books that are crap (a highly significant amount) there is less time to read great and powerful stuff.

    Some degree of serendipity is crucial for discovering good reading material¹, but at some point you have to  find some method that will keep exposing you to  great reading material.

    I’ll devote a series of blogposts to such methods. For this one, I shall discuss an overlooked resource when  trying to decide what to read:  the annotated bibliography (abbreviated as AB for this essay).

    Annotated Bibliographies (ABs)

    Despite my love for reading, I could never imagine reading an AB —much less writing one – except under duress in high school English class.

    A year ago, though, I decided to make an annotated bibliography (AB) about Civil War fiction as an afterward for a Jack Matthewsebook my company was publishing.  It turned out to be an all-consuming project; truthfully just proofreading everything turned out to be a nightmare.  Nonetheless, I think the result was an admirable (and useful) contribution to the genre.

    It’s important to distinguish between a bibliography (which is a mere listing of titles in alphabetical order) and an AB (which not only lists the items, but also describes  why each source is interesting or important). A good AB (and honestly, most of them are good!) is usually worth reading on its own.  A few days ago I read two print  annotated bibliographies of Texas history. Delightful and fascinating!  Frankly, these two books revealed new books that I never could have found by looking in library catalogs or checking   bibliographies of other history  books.

    Perhaps print bibliographies don’t translate well  to web browsing, but AB’s have been on the web for over 20 years. Starting from the 1990s, you would find them everywhere as Description Lists  or (DL) in HTML. That was back when Internet search was iffier and you relied on links pages maintained by human editors to help you find what you wanted. These pages were usually static HTML and more focused on creating paths to other helpful resources. (Alas, nowadays, it seems that most websites aim to trap you or force you to sign up for a newletter or give them  your credit card).

    Even today, the sort of bibliographies which you find on Wikipedia just list book titles and possibly web resources. Nothing is wrong with that of course, but in an age of excessive information, we don’t need to know every work on a topic; we would just like to know which works contain the best information or are ideal for beginners or have the best photographs (etc.) Let’s use  my Civil War bibliography to illustrate how ABs  work and what they offer for readers.

    Why annotated bibliographies are awesome

    First, ABs don’t try to cover everything in a field — just the most interesting things (or the most interesting things that the preparer has encountered). My Civil War fiction AB tried to hit the big landmarks, but there is no doubt that this list overlooks many worthy works. Often the selectivity of these resources make it more helpful to the reader.

    Second, I tried to subdivide the huge list into several smaller categories(containing no more than 20 titles). Also,  I ordered the categories in a way to give certain works more prominence (i.e., Critical Overview and Classics).

    Third, in addition to arranging works by category, I decided against listing them alphabetically.  For the most part, I arranged works by date of publication — although this perhaps can be somewhat disorienting. But it isn’t hard to search for the name of an author or a title in a web browser.

    Fourth, this may not be obvious, but I don’t have any special expertise in the area of Civil War fiction. In fact, I have read surprisingly little Civil War fiction (though I will be correcting this deficiency soon).  Mostly I just did background reading, found some useful bibliographies (both in print and online) and then combined everything.  I found several notable critical studies of Civil War fiction and just listed most of the fiction titles discussed in them. In the 1990s there was a special award specifically for Civil War fiction, and so I list all those titles. By reading book reviews and comments on Amazon, I tried to include a fair summary as well as context (i.e., was this first of a series? Is there anything notable or unique about the author or the narrative angle? Did it win any awards? Was it made into a movie? )

    Fifth, I listed data about the books which might be useful for certain readers. I tried to identify which works were already in the public domain. I also indicated lexile scores for books geared toward younger readers. (Lexile is a method of measuring the relative difficulty of a text and is used by teachers).

    Sixth, online bibliographic resources can remain flexible in format. (This is something that the Wikihow article on ABs acknowledges).  I looked at various style guides  before making my AB. Then I realized that there was no need to give complete citations as required by MLA or Chicago Style Guide. (Besides, it would increase the prep time.) Generally, publication  data is reasonably easy to locate from Amazon.com and other places.

    Date of publication is relevant because it indicates which works are in the public domain (and can be downloaded for free). I debated whether to include links to Project Gutenberg (PG) or archive.org or Amazon.com or Wikipedia, but in the end I decided to keep  hyperlinks to a minimum. I did this mainly because I was making this bibliography for an ebook and worried that putting links here would just create  linkrot. It’s hard to predict how long Project Gutenberg or other web projects  will be able to maintain its URLs.

    This bibliography is (relatively) noncommercial. I stuck a small ad for a Jack Matthews title published by my company, but aside from that, it’s a static page unlikely to change (unless I forget to pay my hosting charges!) In contrast, you can find lots of listicles about Civil War fictionand Civil War books. All are interesting and helpful and written by people with interest or expertise on the subject.

    But listicles are a form of abbreviated journalism and  rarely  systematic. A good features writer can sniff out enough notable books in a field to make  a listicle, but often they are skewed towards newer books and books which are in the public eye (rather than books which are actually interesting or important). Sometimes publications can go offline or migrate to a different software platform — thus disrupting the continuity of URL addresses. Biblio-listicles  reside in an online world subject to various pressures (technical and commercial).

    It would be easy for a wiki site to facilitate the production of ABs. But such bibliographies are better produced by individuals (or small groups of like-minded individuals). I doubt that you can set  criteria for group editing  which are reasonably fair or neutral to all contributors. Wiki software helps in producing the ABs, but the neutral point of view (NPOV) philosophy  and notability criteria  used by Wikipedia isn’t really  compatible with the individual quirkiness which make annotated bibliographies so special and interesting.

    You would think that the proliferation of citation tools and content management systems would mean that ABs would be everywhere online. That is definitely not the case. Maybe in the 1990s when human editors cataloged web resources, this might have been true. Since then, Google Search and Wikipedia articles have taken over, worthy tools, but skewed in their own ways. Google Search can be gamed fairly easily while Wikipedia seems dedicated to  listing resources without trying to assess their value. (If you don’t believe me, try browsing through this top level category of Wiki bibliographies and try to find anything actually useful.)

    ABs are not easy to find using search engines. Every time I try Google to find a good annotated bibliography, the search results consist mainly of commercial products (some of whom are not even available for individuals!) When I try googling a more specific topic for an annotated bibliography, the pickings are usually slim.  Interestingly, it’s not as hard to locate ABs on abstract philosophical topics. Check out this   Chinese philosophy  AB or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy to see what I mean.

    chinese-book

    Online bibliographies have other problems. First, they tend to be database-driven, which means that the view in the browser is often truncated or chunked in an unusable way. Database-driven bibliographies offer advanced sorting and filtering capabilities and occasionally annotations, but their selection criteria might not match your own. For example, which resource in a list of 50 or 100  should you check first? Second, many of these tools cater to institutional customers and not  open to public surfing.

    Take for example the Oxford Bibliographies Online. Sounds and looks promising, but wait! You have to log in, and your institution has to subscribe. If your institution doesn’t subscribe to such a service or if you don’t even belong to an institution, you’re out of luck.

    Many of the best AB’s are in book appendices (i.e., not online).  Again, there is a lot of segregation between users who have institutional accounts (and better access to bibliographies and ebooks) and users who don’t.

    While I compiled material for my Civil War AB,  not having access to most of these academic services severely limited what I could find online.

    On the other hand, print versions of academic books from my city library often had ample  bibliographies in their appendices. (Perhaps they were not ABs, but they were still very useful.)

    This leads to my final question: If many academic books contain ample and carefully crafted  ABs in the appendix, why don’t more authors simply repost the appendix online?

    2025 Update. To my surprise and delight, making annotated lists seems to be something that AI engines excel in doing. It can gather and summarize in a line or two the apparent subject and the critical response. The main problem is that it swipes books from bestseller lists and misses a lot of interesting works which are not as widely known. Here is a prompt I used with Gemini:

    Give me an annotated list of 100 fiction titles written and published in English about the U.S. civil war. This can also include fiction about plantation life, slavery, reconstruction period and fiction taking place at a time near the time of the US Civil War (but not necessarily depicting it). Include graphic novels, YA novels and fictionalized versions of historical events, but exclude memoirs, biographies and historical correspondence. If any title has won or been nominated for a literary prize, mention it in the annotation. These fiction titles must be novellas or novels and must be published between 1930 and 2020.

    NOTES

    1  I actually think contemporary readers need to be more adventurous about what they read, even if it means having to struggle through crap once in a while. Indie publishing is flooded with perfectly interesting books which don’t win awards or get reviewed in notable places. This tendency to seek only books by award winners or books  have been widely praised  is perfectly understandable (and results in a higher probability that you will read a  winner),  but it also eliminates the thrill of discovery and also keeps hidden many remarkable literary works. It also lets you read with auto-pilot turned on; you are not really trusting your own judgment but instead simply trying to validate whether your opinions match what the critics have said.  My solution is to  download  and read a lot of first chapters and later abandon a lot of books after that. Sure, you can’t judge every book by a single  chapter, but at least I’m giving a lot of unknown authors a chance to enter my brain.

    (If you know of any annotated bibliographies online to recommend, feel free to list them in the comments). 

  • Smashwords vs. Amazon: An ebook comparison

    Sept 2022 Update: Reflected to show the combined merger of Smashwords + Draft2Digital.

    The next two days will feature posts about ebook distribution and affiliate marketing for blogs. Today’s post will compare two leading ebook distributors (Amazon and Smashwords). Tomorrow’s post (which is here) will explore the dilemmas faced by a blogger in promoting purchases from one distributor over another.

    Amazon and Smashwords both sell ebooks, and lately I’ve been keeping a list of the pluses and minus of both distributors. Comparing the two is slightly absurd because ebooks are Smashword’s core competency (perhaps its only competency), while for Amazon, ebooks are just one part of its commercial empire. Amazon sells not only dedicated devices but creates apps for major mobile platforms. It sells digital content which you can own or stream or rent. It’s tempting to say that because Amazon is bigger, it’s also better. That’s not necessarily true. As a smaller (and more nimble) ebook provider, Smashwords offers several advantages over Amazon.

    Author-Friendliness

    • Author royalties for low cost books? Smashwords wins. (Below 2.99, amazon pays 30% to author, while Smashwords pays 50-70%). 2020 Update. Google Books is paying 70% royalties on all ebooks regardless of price and allows you to set price to free — which is a really big deal.
    • Buyer has full access and use of the purchased ebook file (without drm)? Smashwords wins.
    • Royalties on large file ebooks? Amazon charges a “file delivery fee” on large ebook files which essentially drive you to 35% royalties. In contrast, file size does not affect author earnings on Smashwords.
    • Supports epub — the international standard for ebooks? Smashwords wins. Amazon’s ebook readers and reading systems lets you import pdf, mobi and MS Word, but it plays dumb when it comes to epub files.
    • Allows free and pay-what-you-want ebooks? Smashwords wins.
    • Author can make coupons to distribute to fans? Smashwords wins. Coupon manager is one of their best features.
    • Offers ebook creation tools? Both suck, but amazon has more tools and Kindle Previewer for testing.Update: Now both have their own ebook creation tools and accept epubs directly. Draft2Digital has some very nice templates.
    • Author can put videos on book page? Smashwords wins. Amazon only lets you do it on Author Central book page
    • Affiliate marketing features? Smashwords has better rates and features, but a smaller customer base.
    • Author giveaways. Amazon requires authors to buy their own ebooks to give them away. Smashwords lets you make unlimited number of freebie coupons. Update: Upon request, KDP publishers can use price-matching to bring a price down to free (I explain how at the bottom of this long article).
    • Provide ways to produce printed books? Both do this now I believe.
    • Book page. Smashwords has much fewer distractions. Book marketing guru David Gaughran wrote, “As I write these words, there are currently 248 different titles on the product page of the Kindle edition of “Let’s Get Digital.” Between the ads, Also Boughts, Also Vieweds, Amazon promotion, and other links, there are hundreds of things that could distract a reader before they purchase.

    Consumer Side of Ebooks

    • Has a nice cloud-based solution for multiple devices? Amazon wins. Smashwords doesn’t have a cloud-based ereader, but the consumer has the freedom to import purchases into whatever reading system can read DRM-free ebook files. Smashwords also can serve files to Dropbox.
    • Offers ebook samples? Amazon wins. Smashwords occasionally offers samples, but it’s clumsy.
    • Is easier to get ebooks on a preferred device? Amazon wins. Amazon has built reading systems for almost any device. It will automatically forward purchased items to your device. Smashwords requires that you choose a third party reading system which you will manually upload the file to your preferred device and reading system.
    • Has price-alert tools? Amazon wins by a long shot. Ereaderiq and others.
    • More freebies? Smashwords wins. Amazon has lots of freebies too, but often they are temporary or made through special arrangement between a publisher and amazon.
    • User-friendly shopping cart? Amazon is better, but Smashwords paypal shopping cart has gotten somewhat better over the years
    • Offers a monthly all you-can-eat option? Amazon wins with Kindle Unlimited (KU). On the other hand, most authors on KU are promising to let amazon be exclusive distributor, which is wrong.
    • Lets you view word count? Smashwords gives exact word counts of ebooks it sells. With Amazon, it’s less clear how much content is in an individual ebook.
    • Easier for non-us audiences? Smashwords has one store for everybody; Amazon has different stores for each region. This sounds easier, but it also means that consumers are not eligible for certain promotions.
    • Resolves customer service issues? Amazon wins slightly. You can ask for an ebook refund within a week, which is extremely generous. Smashwords customer support tickets are handled very promptly (and I have never had issues with them).
    • Which ebooks are better formatted? Varies widely, but generally because amazon has a higher percentage of ebooks by professional publishers, their ebooks look better. 12/2019 Update: SW now allows direct uploading of more than one version of an ebook (i.e., mobi & epub), so now publishers no longer need to rely on the inhouse conversion tool to make ebooks –horray!)
    • Which has better ebook management/font options/annotation? Amazon wins simply because Smashwords doesn’t have a cloud-based reading system; you must choose your own solution. That said, Amazon’s reading system is powerful; it lets you organize by bookshelves and collections. You assign ebooks into one or more collections either from within the Kindle itself or the Amazon site.
    • Which website is easier to browse? Smashwords has many different ways to browse through and filter results. Often it’s easier to view ebook descriptions. Amazon used to be good, but they disabled audience-created lists. Amazon search results show a definite favoritism towards bigger publishers and those who have paid to advertise. On the plus side, amazon has autogenerated “also boughts” which show up on the ebook page; this occasionally can lead you to interesting titles.
    • Which let you browse by publisher? Smashwords is much better. On Smashwords, it’s relatively easy to view titles by one publisher (such as Fomite Press) You could search on Amazon, but often the results are harder to browse through.
    • Which allows lending? Tie. Amazon has a nifty lending feature, but most big publishers have disabled this feature. Because Smashwords sell everything without drm, lending is always permitted, though it must be done manually.
    • Can you keep your ebooks if the distributor goes bankrupt? Presumably Amazon is big enough not to be in danger of going bankrupt anytime soon. But unless Amazon makes alternate arrangements, it’s not likely that books bought there will transfer to another ebook platform. Smashwords lets you keep the ebook files and import them into another reading system later.

    Overall mindshare in the reading world

    I define mindshare as the benefits that accrue from a product having a bigger audience. How does the size of the audience enhance the service for customers?

    • Which has more reviews? Amazon wins by a long shot (but Draft2Digital customers can simply look at Amazon reviews too!)
    • More technical/professional ebooks? Amazon is the market leader Draft2Digital doesn’t even come close, mainly because until recently publishers had to use the company’s ebook creation tool. (Now, you can upload an epub file directly).
    • which has more ebooks and authors? Amazon has probably 10x the number, but prices on Smashwords are generally cheaper and quality freebies are easier to find.
    • Which have more name brand authors and publishers? Definitely Amazon. Draft2Digital has very few major publishers or authors. (Major publishers avoid distributors which lack drm)
    • Which has cheaper prices? Smashwords has more seasonal sales and deep discount sales. Amazon has more tools (inhouse-and third party) to manage pricing and promotions.
    • Which is publishing/promoting individual authors? Definitely Amazon wins. A few years ago, amazon started various ebook imprints — Amazon Crossing, little a, etc which has delivered many incredible low-cost exclusive ebooks to consumers. One week in 2018 they offered a dozen freebie titles of extremely talented international authors. Amazon has the big bucks and the inhouse expertise to pull off stunts like this. Smashwords has stayed out of the review/recommendation game altogether
    • which have more sexually explicit titles? Draft2Digital is much better. It has more liberal policies towards sexually explicit content while letting consumers filter what they want. Amazon has a lot of explicit content too, but I’ve heard some authors complain about Amazon blocking their ebook (or at least a ebook with a racy title or cover).
    • Which has the better book community? Amazon runs GoodReads which is an extremely active and book-friendly community (and not too centered around loving Amazon). On the other hand, Amazon is marketed towards everybody while Smashwords is marketed specifically at rabid ebook fans who are more willing to take a chance with an unfamiliar author, less likely to read the next bestseller. Amazon definitely has a long tail, but they also offer a lot of books by celebrities and right-wing pundits and self-help gurus. Amazon reflects the priorities of big publishers and bestseller lists, while Smashwords just offers a collection of random self-published authors who are trying to thrive outside of Amazon’s reach. On Smashwords you get a lot more amateurish stuff, but also edgier, less commercial stuff.

    Have I forgotten any key features for this comparison matrix? Feel free to add in the comments below.

    Feb 19 Update. I just noticed that Smashwords is making tweaks to customer-facing interfaces: wishlists, libraries, etc. This is a very good sign.

  • Copyright Ghosts of 1923 Come Alive Tomorrow!

    (I originally posted this on Teleread in 2007. The horrifying decision to freeze the public domain for 20 extra years has increased costs to libraries, schools, students and scholars. The works below would have gone into the public domain in 1999; instead, they will go into the public domain tomorrow! The openculture blog has more).

    “You are all a lost generation”
    Gertrude Stein, quoted in preface to Hemingway’s Sun Also Rises (1926)

    See also: Welcome to 1922! (Introduction)Ghosts of 1924. For Texas readers, see my tirade about why Dorothy Scarborough’s The Wind isn’t in the public domain.

    All the works listed below were scheduled to go into the U.S. public domain in 1999–except that a 1998 law mandated a 20 year delay–causing higher prices for students, teachers and libraries. Instead of 1999, these works will become part of the U.S. public domain only in 2019.

    Caveat: This is a work in progress. It may not be accurate. However, it will be updated over time (and hopefully made more accurate). Some of the works listed below might be very well be in the public domain or special arrangements might have been made to make them available in digitalized form. Always google to be sure. If you have edits/additions, send them to me here: idiotprogrammer at fastmailbox.net .

    How I Compiled This List

    First, let me explain how I located works specific to each year. I’m no expert on that decade, and frankly I did nothing that no other savvy Net Surfer could do using google and well-known resources.

    1. Wikipedia uses year pages as a central reference point to events, people and creative works particular to the time period. If you go to Wikipedia’s entry to 1923, you will find links to Literature and Film. I’ve found a lot of discrepancies about dates on wikipedia, so you shouldn’t take for granted that dates are absolutely correct (you should probably verify these dates elsewhere). However, they are usually in the ballpark. One of the problems with this dating system on Wikipedia is that it based on self-reporting by wikipedia posters; many well-known works probably haven’t been listed yet. Still, it’s enough to get a person started.
    2. University of Pennsylvania has a great listing of prize winners by year. Obviously not all great works were prize winners, but this helps you to be sure you haven’t overlooked any prize-winning works. This site links to digital copies when available. Sometimes it happens that post-1922 works have made it in the public domain for one reason or another. Also, because copyright law in Australia is Death + 50 Years, Project Gutenberg in Australia, they are sometimes able to carry certain works not yet available in the U.S. (Suddenly my heart is surging with a feeling of Australian nationalism).
    3. For general reference information about copyright, check University of Pennsylvania’s listing of copyright laws by country and Cornell U.’s reference guide to U.S. copyright law.
    4. Google Book Search tends to be pretty conservative about which books it allows full text for, but on the other hand, the best two things about it are 1)easy access to the copyright page to verify date (regardless of whether it’s in public domain) and 2)google-produced PDFs which are just a collection of screenshots of scans. I haven’t tried it, but now Project Gutenberg’s Distributed Proofreader’s Project is using these PDF’s to OCR these works, saving individuals and libraries a lot of time and effort (horray Google!) .
    5. Here’s a list of copyright renewals by year. For example in 1923, works needed to be renewed in 1950, 1951 or 1952. This table provides a gigantic page of 1923 works which were not renewedand a list of works which were renewed (zip). I can’t really say how accurate or complete this information is (and by the way, I generally did not consult it when listing works below).
    6. The Internet Speculative Fiction Database is the only literary source that lets you narrow by year. Its purpose seems to be sci fi/fantasy, but for now the database lists lots of general works as well. It also lists short stories and essays printed in a particular year–particularly useful. This website is still buggy and lists incomplete/unedited information. Also, the dates may contain second editions, so some might already be in the public domain. Still a good resource, and likely to improve with time.
    7. Project Gutenberg lists a lot of works that are post-1922 but are not put in the public domain by virtue of publication date. Maybe they have made alternate arrangements. The PG Clearance team is pretty sharp; I seriously doubt they would make a mistake.
    8. The Golden Age of Detection wiki lists detective novels from the Golden Age of Detective Fiction, period between the 1920s and 1930s in England and (to a limited extent) the U.S. There are many ways to find detective novels in a certain time period. The most direct seems to be to enter “1923” as a search term in its search box.
    9. The IMDB database offers lots of ways to browse films by date. The problem is that even in 1923 there were 2099 listings. This is a cumbersome way to search. However, links on the left side allow you to list by total votes and by average vote. These two links have further links to the 100 top links in that category. However, I’ve observed discrepancies in dates. Also, many of these films are foreign, and you can’t tell the release date of these films in the US. I’m limiting myself to American releases (generally). Don’t forget to click on the Review link for individual films. BTW, make sure to check whether the film has a link to an External Review; some of the notable ones do.
    10. In archive.org you can do search by Date Ranges. You have to use Advanced Search, and it’s a bit cumbersome, but it works; . Also Openflix is distributing early public domain works. You can’t neatly search by year, but often entering the year into the Search box produces tidy search results. They used to provide p2p links, but now they provide links to streaming videos and cheap editions you can find on amazon.
    11. See also the National Registry of Films list. You can list films by date, and pretty much see which films that historians and archivists deemed notable/significant for a particular year.
    12. Other Categories: I am generally not listing literary works originally other than English here. For English-speaking audiences, we care about the copyright date of translations (although it is true that a person living today could write their own free translation from the original and post it online). Also, I haven’t listed much in the way of history/nonfiction/essays simply because I have no way of finding out what’s out there.

    The Ghosts of 1923–A Synopsis

    1923 was a great year. The country was suffering under an incompetent U.S. president, and in midyear another took office to fix the mess he’d created. William Butler Yeatswon the Nobel prize. Both Robert Frost and E.E. Cummings produced their first major collections of poetry (so did Wallace Stevens, but luckily it contained previously published works now in the public domain). W.C. Williams wrote two volumes of poetry; curiously even his pre-1923 works haven’t made it onto Gutenberg. A female sci fi writer named Gertrude Atherton published a sensational, semi-autobiographical novel Black Oxen, about a middle-aged woman who miraculously becomes young again after glandular therapy. It was made into a well-received film a year later. Harlem Renaissance writer Jean Toomer created Cane, a series of poems and short stories considered to be an important work of high modernism. English writer (and friend of Rosetti) Hall Caine wrote an anti-war novel of a romance between a German POW and an English girl; it was made into a film in 1927. Feminist dramatist/fiction writer Zona Gale wrote another love story that satirized life in a small town. Edwin Lefèvre wrote a classic novel describing the life of a professional stock-trader on Wall Street (akin to a 1920’s Bonfire of the Vanities). Elmer Rice wrote Adding Machine, widely considered an early expressionist classic of American theater. P.G. Wodehouse had another Jeeves book out; G.B. Shaw had another play; Willa Cather had two novels; H.G. Wells had one, and adventure writer H. Rider Haggard had one too. Arnold Bennett had his last great masterpiece Riceyman Steps (now on Gutenberg).

    IMDB shows a mere 2099 movies produced in 1923 (a good percentage, we may assume are not American). Everything is still silent (obviously), but still there’s a wide variety of productions. Laurel and Hardy released 19 new films; Buster Keatonproduced three; Hal Roach’s Our Gang comedies started appearing with 19 in 1923; so did the classic Harold Lloyd‘s Safety Last (where he hangs off a clock on a building). Cecil de Mille produced two more epics. We also see an early work of Fay Wray (who starred in King Kong 10 years later). Alla Nazimova produced the controversial and lavish avante-garde Salome version of Oscar Wilde’s play, replete with “bare-chested boys, blond Nubian slaves, metallic potted palms, art nouveau floral patterns, and birdcage dungeons (wrote a Village Voice critic recently). There was Covered Wagon, a Western with a giant budget and other films with various plots about orphans, Irish immigrants, woman heading off to Hollywood to be a star (Hollywood was big even then).

    Of course, I have only scratched the surface. Obviously there are many more books, plays and movies and paintings I haven’t had time to describe here. Now, thanks to 1998 legislation passed by your congressmen, these and other works will have to wait an extra 20 years for Americans to have easy access to them. You have 12 years of waiting to go.

    Literary Works of 1923–Poems/Drama

    • E. E. Cummings – Tulips & Chimneys
    • Robert Frost – New Hampshire (won Pulitzer)
    • William Carlos Williams: Go Go, Spring and All
    • Elmer Rice – The Adding Machine
    • George Bernard Shaw – Saint Joan
    • John Masefield — Dauber And the Daffodil Fields
    • Wallace Stevens – Harmonium
    • Owen Davis, Icebound (won Pulitzer for drama)

    Literary Works of 1923–Fiction

    • Gertrude Atherton – Black Oxen (racy sci fi later made into 1924 film). Update: Expired copyright.
    • Sherwood Anderson – Many Marriages
    • Max Brand – Seven Trails (writer of Westerns/pulps)
    • Hall Caine – The Woman of Knockaloe
    • Willa Cather – A Lost Lady; One of Ours
    • Marie Corelli – Love and the Philosopher
    • Zona Gale – Faint Perfume
    • Georgette Heyer – The Great Roxhythe (Heyer wrote historical romances/detective novels)
    • Dark Frigate by Charles Boardman Hawes (Children, Newberry)
    • A. A. Milne – The House at Pooh Corner
    • Jules Romains – Knock
    • Felix Salten – Bambi, A Life in the Woods
    • Dorothy L. Sayers – Whose Body? (expired copyright)
    • James Stephens – Deirdre
    • Jean Toomer – Cane
    • H. G. Wells – Men Like Gods
    • Margaret Wilson -The Able McLaughlins (Pulitzer) . Wully McLaughlin, a member of a Scots community in frontier Iowa, is alarmed by the behavior of his sweetheart when he returns from battle in the Civil War.
    • Edwin Lefèvre – Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (free on the net)
    • H. Rider Haggard – Wisdom’s Daughter
    • Arnold Bennett – Riceyman Steps (now at PG)
    • Weeds by Edith Summers Kelley, First published in 1923, Weeds is set amid the tobacco tenant farms of rural Kentucky. This pioneering naturalist novel tells the story of a hard-working, spirited young woman who finds herself in a soul-destroying battle with the imprisoning duties of motherhood and of managing an impoverished household. The novel is particularly noteworthy for its heartbreaking depiction of a woman who suffers not from a lack of love, but from an unrequited longing for self-expression and freedom
    • Novels by Anzia Yezierska : Salome of the Tenements and Children of Loneliness

    Films of 1923

    • Gasoline Love (early film with Fay Wray)
    • Burning Brazier (surreal French/Russian detective ) Ivan Mozzhukhin
    • Little Old New York, comedy of Irish female immigrant who comes to USA starring Marion Davies), dir. Sidney Olcott
    • Zaza, story of French music star battling with her rival
    • The Extra Girl, actress wins a contest to become a star
    • Our Hospitality & Balloonatic, Three Ages, Love Nest (1923) Buster Keaton classic
    • Covered Wagon, Western with giant budget
    • The Daring Years, starring Mildred Harris, Charles Emmett Mack and Clara Bow
    • The Hunchback of Notre Dame, starring Lon Chaney
    • The Purple Highway, starring Madge Kennedy, Monte Blue, Vincent Coleman and Pedro de Cordoba
    • Safety Last!, starring Harold Lloyd. In one scene, Lloyd is seen climbing around and hanging off the side of a tall building, including a very famous scene where he hangs off a clock. Lloyd did all of his own stunts, and worked without a safety net. Also in the same year, Why Worry?, silent comedy about hypochondriac millionaire
    • Salomé, starring Alla Nazimova; directed by Charles Bryant, stylized avante-garde version of Oscar Wilde’s play (deemed a “culturally significant film by the National Film Registry).
    • Souls for Sale, starring Richard Dix and Eleanor Boardman; look at gliterati of Hollywood
    • A Woman of Paris & Pilgrim , starring Edna Purviance; directed by Charles Chaplin
    • It’s a Gift & 18 other Our Gang films (written by Hal Roach )
    • White Rose, D.W. Griffith tale of an orphan girl who goes out into the world.
    • Bright Shawl, adventure/political/spy thriller Edward G. Robinson, Mary Astor, William Powell
    • Adam’s Rib & 10 Commandments Directed by Cecil B. DeMille
    • Laurel & Hardy: 19 videos (!!!)

    Essays/History/Autobiography/Nonfiction

    • Studies in Classic American Literature, by DH Lawrence; famous litcrit.
    • Robert Henri – The Art Spirit (essays and conversations about art by artist/teacher who led Ashcan Art movement of realistic American art).

    Detective Fiction

    (I haven’t verified these titles, but a commenter to the original article referred me to the Golden Age of Detection Fiction  )

    • Baroque (1923)
    • Behind Locked Doors (1923)
    • Black, White and Brindled (1923) by Eden Phillpotts
    • Bones of the River (1923) by Edgar Wallace
    • Captains of Souls (1923) by Edgar Wallace
    • Cheri-bibi and Cecily aka Missing Men (1923) by Gaston Leroux
    • Chick (1923) by Edgar Wallace
    • Children of the Wind (1923) by MP Shiel
    • Cole, GDH & M – The Brooklyn Murders – (1923)
    • Contact and Other Stories (1923) by Frances Noyes Hart
    • Craig Kennedy Listens In (1923) by Arthur Reeve
    • Days to Remember (1923) by John Buchan
    • Dorothée, danseuse de corde (1923)
    • Dr Thorndyke’s Casebook aka The Blue Scarab (1923)
    • Feathers Left Around (1923)
    • Hounded Down (1923) by Roy Vickers
    • Impromptu (1923) by Elliot Paul
    • Jim Hanvey, Detective (1923) by Octavus Roy Cohen
    • Jim Maitland (1923)
    • John Dighton, Mystery Millionaire (1923)
    • Klondyke Kit’s Revenge (1923) by George Goodchild
    • La poupée sanglante & La machine à assassiner (1923)
    • Many Engagements {short stories} (1923) by JS Fletcher
    • Michael’s Evil Deeds (1923) by E Phillips Oppenheim
    • Midwinter (1923) by John Buchan
    • Monsieur Jonquelle (1923) by Melville Davisson Post
    • More Lives Than One (1923)
    • Mr Fortune’s Practice (1923) by HC Bailey
    • Once In A Red Moon (1923) by Joel Townsley Rogers
    • Secret Service Smith (1923)
    • Spooky Hollow (1923)
    • That Fellow Macarthur (1923) by Selwyn Jepson
    • The Affair at Flower Acres (1923)
    • The Ambitious Lady (1923) by JS Fletcher
    • The Astonishing Adventure of Jane Smith (1923) by Patricia Wentworth
    • The Big Heart (1923)
    • The Blackguard (1923)
    • The Books of Bart (1923) by Edgar Wallace
    • The Brooklyn Murders (1923); by GDH Cole
    • The Call Box Mystery (1923) by John Ironside
    • The Cartwright Gardens Murder (1923) by JS Fletcher
    • The Cat’s Eye (1923) by R Austin Freeman
    • The Charing Cross Mystery (1923) by JS Fletcher
    • The Clue of the New Pin (1923) by Edgar Wallace
    • The Copper Box (1923) by JS Fletcher
    • The Eyes of Max Carrados (1923) by Ernest Bramah
    • The Flaming Spectre of Cloome (1923)
    • The Four Stragglers (1923)
    • The Green Archer (1923) by Edgar Wallace
    • The Green Eyes (1923)
    • The Groote Park Murder (1923) by Freeman Wills Crofts
    • The House at Waterloo (1923)
    • The Inevitable Millionaires (1923) by E Phillips Oppenheim
    • The King’s Red-Haired Girl (1923) by Selwyn Jepson
    • The Last Secrets {essays and articles} (1923) by John Buchan
    • The Lone Wolf Returns (1923) by Louis Joseph Vance
    • The Mazaroff Murder {aka The Mazaroff Mystery} (1923) by JS Fletcher
    • The Million-Dollar Diamond (1923) by JS Fletcher
    • The Missing Million (1923) by Edgar Wallace
    • The Moth-Woman (1923) by Fergus Hume
    • The Murder on the Links (1923) by Agatha Christie
    • The Mysterious Chinaman (1923) {aka The Rippling Ruby}
    • The Mysterious Mr Garland (1923) by Wyndham Martin
    • The Mystery of Glyn Castle (1923)
    • The Mystery Road (1923) by E Phillips Oppenheim
    • The Nature of a Crime (1923), with Ford Madox Ford by Joseph Conrad
    • The Orange Divan (1923) by Valentine Williams
    • The Other Story, and Other Stories, (1923) by Henry Kitchell Webster
    • The Red Redmaynes (1923) by Eden Phillpotts
    • The Return of Anthony Trent (1923) by Wyndham Martin
    • The Rover (1923) by Joseph Conrad
    • The Secret of the Sandhills (1923) by Arthur Gask
    • The Secret of Thurlestone Towers (1923)
    • The Seven Conundrums (1923) by E Phillips Oppenheim
    • The Sinister Mark (1923)
    • The Step on the Stair (1923) by Anna Katherine Green
    • The Thing at Their Heels (1923) by Eden Phillpotts
    • The Valley of Lies (1923) by George Goodchild
    • The Veiled Prisoner (1923) by Gaston Leroux
    • The Vengeance of Henry Jarroman (1923) by Roy Vickers
    • The Whipping Girl (1923) by Ralph Rodd
    • The Wild Bird (1923) by Hulbert Footner
    • The Woman Accused (1923) by Roy Vickers
    • The Yard (1923) by Horace Annesley Vachell
    • Tut Tut Mr Tutt (1923) by Arthur Train
    • Wheels Within Wheels (1923)
    • Whose Body? (1923) by Dorothy L Sayers
    • Why They Married (1923) by Mrs Belloc Lowndes